1. Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1983.
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Press; 1994.
3. Jacobs DM, Sano M, Dooneief G, Marder K, Bell KL, Stern Y. Neuropsychological detection and characterization of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1995;45:957-962. PMID:
7746414.
4. Knesevich JW, LaBarge E, Edwards D. Predictive value of the Boston Naming Test in mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Psychiatry Res 1986;19:155-161. PMID:
3786607.
5. Kittner SJ, White LR, Farmer ME, Wolz M, Kaplan E, Moes E, et al. Methodological issues in screening for dementia: the problem of education adjustment. J Chronic Dis 1986;39:163-170. PMID:
3949940.
6. Kim H, Na D. Korean Version-Boston Naming Test. Seoul: Hakjisa; 1997.
7. Kim HH, Na DL. Normative data on the Korean version of the Boston Naming Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1999;21:127-133. PMID:
10421007.
8. Kang YW, Kim HH, Na DL. A short form of the Korean-boston naming test (K-BNT) for using in dementia patients. Korean J Clin Psychol 1999;18:125-138.
9. Kang Y, Kim HH, Na DL. Parallel short forms for the Korean-Boston naming test (K-BNT). J Korean Neurol Assoc 2000;18:144-150.
10. Lee JH, Lee KU, Lee DY, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim JH, et al. Development of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002;57:P47-P53. PMID:
11773223.
11. Pedraza O, Graff-Radford NR, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Willis FB, Petersen RC, et al. Differential item functioning of the Boston Naming Test in cognitively normal African American and Caucasian older adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2009;15:758-768. PMID:
19570311.
12. Ramirez M, Teresi JA, Holmes D, Gurland B, Lantigua R. Differential item functioning (DIF) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Overview, sample, and issues of translation. Med Care 2006;44(11 Suppl 3):S95-S106. PMID:
17060840.
13. Jones RN, Gallo JJ. Education and sex differences in the mini-mental state examination: effects of differential item functioning. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002;57:P548-P558. PMID:
12426438.
14. Teresi JA, Golden RR, Cross P, Gurland B, Kleinman M, Wilder D. Item bias in cognitive screening measures: comparisons of elderly white, Afro-American, Hispanic and high and low education subgroups. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:473-483. PMID:
7722601.
15. Marshall SC, Mungas D, Weldon M, Reed B, Haan M. Differential item functioning in the Mini-Mental State Examination in English-and Spanish-speaking older adults. Psychol Aging 1997;12:718-725. PMID:
9416639.
16. Teresi J, Kleinman M, Ocepek-Welikson K, Ramirez M, Gurland B, Lantigua R, et al. Applications of item response theory to the examination of the psychometric properties and differential item functioning of the comprehensive assessment and referral evaluation dementia diagnostic scale among samples of Latino, African American, and White non-Latino elderly. Res Aging 2000;22:738-773.
17. Weinstock LM, Strong D, Uebelacker LA, Miller IW. Differential item functioning of DSM-IV depressive symptoms in individuals with a history of mania versus those without: an item response theory analysis. Bipolar Disord 2009;11:289-297. PMID:
19419386.
18. Kim KW, Park JH, Kim MH, Kim MD, Kim BJ, Kim SK, et al. A nationwide survey on the prevalence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in South Korea. J Alzheimers Dis 2011;23:281-291. PMID:
21178286.
19. Lee DY, Lee KU, Lee JH, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim SY, et al. A normative study of the CERAD neuropsychological assessment battery in the Korean elderly. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2004;10:72-81. PMID:
14751009.
20. Reise SP, Ainsworth AT, Haviland MG. Item response theory fundamentals, applications, and promise in psychological research. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2005;14:95-101.
21. McGrory S, Doherty J, Austin E, Starr J, Shenkin S. Item response theory analysis of cognitive tests in people with dementia: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2014;14:47PMID:
24552237.
22. Teresi JA. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): scaling the MMSE using item response theory (IRT). J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:256-259. PMID:
17292019.
23. Thissen D, Steinberg L, Kuang D. Quick and easy implementation of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for controlling the false positive rate in multiple comparisons. J Educ Behav Stat 2002;27:77-83.
24. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1995;57:289-300.
25. Crane PK, Gibbons LE, Jolley L, van Belle G, Selleri R, Dalmonte E, et al. Differential item functioning related to education and age in the Italian version of the Mini-mental State Examination. Int Psychogeriatr 2006;18:505-515. PMID:
16478571.
26. Holman R, Glas CA, de Haan RJ. Power analysis in randomized clinical trials based on item response theory. Control Clin Trials 2003;24:390-410. PMID:
12865034.
27. Zec RF, Burkett NR, Markwell SJ, Larsen DL. Normative data stratified for age, education, and gender on the Boston Naming Test. Clin Neuropsychol 2007;21:617-637. PMID:
17613981.
28. Nicholas M, Obler L, Albert M, Goodglass H. Lexical retrieval in healthy aging. Cortex 1985;21:595-606. PMID:
4092486.
29. Ripich DN, Petrill SA, Whitehouse PJ, Ziol EW. Gender differences in language of AD patients: a longitudinal study. Neurology 1995;45:299-302. PMID:
7854529.
30. Buckwalter JG, Sobel E, Dunn ME, Diz MM, Henderson VW. Gender differences on a brief measure of cognitive functioning in Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol 1993;50:757-760. PMID:
8323481.
31. Bayles K, Azuma T, Cruz R, Tomoeda C, Wood J, Montgomery E Jr. Gender differences in language of Alzheimer disease patients revisited. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1999;13:138-146. PMID:
10485572.
32. Kurt M, Karakaya İ, Safaz İ, Ateş G. Differential item functioning by education and sex in subtests of the Repeatable Battery Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Eur J Psychol Assess 2015;31:5-11.
33. Crane P, Gibbons L, Jolley L, van Belle G. Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques: DIF detect and difwithpar. Med Care 2006;44(11 Suppl 3):S115-S123. PMID:
17060818.
34. Lukatela K, Malloy P, Jenkins M, Cohen R. The naming deficit in early Alzheimer's and vascular dementia. Neuropsychology 1998;12:565-572. PMID:
9805326.
35. Diehl J, Monsch AU, Aebi C, Wagenpfeil S, Krapp S, Grimmer T, et al. Frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, and Alzheimer's disease: the contribution of standard neuropsychological tests to differential diagnosis. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2005;18:39-44. PMID:
15681627.