Psychiatry Investig Search


Psychiatry Investig > Epub ahead of print
Laere, Tee, and Tang: Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Using Trail Making Test: A Meta-Analysis



The present meta-analysis aimed to analyze the cognitive performance of schizophrenia patients measured by Trail Making Tests (TMT) and the contribution of socio-demographic factors to cognitive impairments.


PubMed and PsycARTICLES databases were searched for the studies published between January 1985 and November 2017. Data were drawn from 19 studies encompassing 1095 patients and 324 controls. The effect size and heterogeneity were assessed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2 using random-effect model.


Overall, the results showed that the schizophrenia patients performed significantly (p<0.001) worse than healthy controls in both TMT-A and B. However, concurrent substance abuse, clinical status (inpatient or outpatient), duration of education and duration of illness were not associated with cognitive impairment among the schizophrenia patients.


The present meta-analysis confirmed the cognitive processing speed and flexibility of schizophrenia patients were impaired. However, their duration of education, duration of illness and clinical status (inpatient or outpatient) were not the risk factors.


Cognitive impairments are one of the common neurocognitive abnormalities in schizophrenia [1,2]. The deficits involve a number of cognitive domains such as general intelligence, attention, working memory, verbal fluency, verbal learning and memory as well as executive functioning [3]. These cognitive domains are assessed using several neuropsychological testing batteries. Trail Making Test (TMT) is commonly used to assess motor processing speed, complex visual scanning and cognitive flexibility [4]. TMT-A, which is used to evaluate processing speed, requires the participant to connect the serially numbers that are scattered on a page by drawing a line. Meanwhile, TMT-B is done by alternately linking the sequentially numbers and letters on a page. This will provide information on cognitive flexibility of the individual [5].
Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia patients can be associated with several factors such as age [6], gender [7]. education duration, illness duration [8], age of onset and negative symptoms [9]. However, the effects of these factors on cognitive domains are inconclusive [10-13]. TMT is highly sensitive to attentional and executive impairments, as well as to psychomotor slowing. It is proven that the TMT performance is affected by age, education and intelligence [14,15], where age and education were significantly correlated with TMT-A and TMT-B scores [4]. Although substance-abusing schizophrenia patients had worse clinical outcomes compared to non-substance abusing patients [16], a study demonstrated that schizophrenia patients with substance abuse showed substantially better performance in executive functions measured by TMT-A and B [17]. On the other hand, several studies showed no significant difference in executive functions between these two groups of patients [18,19].
As cognitive impairment has been proposed as putative endophenotypes in schizophrenia [20,21], investigation of factors that may affect the cognitive performance is essential. Thus, the current study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis on cognitive processing speed as well as cognitive flexibility of schizophrenia patients based on TMT-A and TMT-B scores, respectively. Our study also investigated the association of substance abuse, education duration, illness duration and patients’ clinical status with their cognitive performance.


Literature search

Two databases, PsycARTICLES and PubMed, were searched with these keywords: “trail making test,” “schizophrenia patients,” and “controlled studies.” The search included articles related to human subjects published from 1985 until November 2017 and was not subjected to English-language restriction. At the first stage of screening, a total of 263 studies was identified, including 242 papers from PsycARTICLES and 21 papers from PubMed. Then, non-related articles, such as literature reviews, meta-analysis, interviews, systematic reviews and mathematical model papers were filtered. This led to the retrieval of 32 eligible articles for full-text review (Figure 1).

Criteria for inclusion

All the selected articles selected met the following criteria. First, all the patients included in this analysis must be diagnosed within the schizophrenia spectrum i.e. schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and schizophreniform disorder, based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) criteria. Second, the data for TMT-A and TMT-B must be presented as separated values and completed with mean, standard deviation and total sample number. Third, for randomized trials and pilot studies, only baseline scores were included in the analysis. For this, due to the present of two TMT values in a single article, the article was cited with the addition of ‘a’ and ‘b’ letter in the parentheses at the end of author’s name. Thus, from the 32 retrieved articles, only 19 of those met the inclusion criteria.

Data collection and description of the studies

First authors’ names, year of publication, characteristics of participants as well as the mean and standard deviation values of TMT (TMT-A and B) were extracted from each paper (Table 1). Two types of analyses were conducted: 1) comparison between the TMT scores of schizophrenia patients and healthy controls and 2) mean of each of the TMT scores among the patients. Subgroup analyses were performed in order to study the association between cognitive performance of patients and their duration of education, duration of illness as well as their hospital status as inpatients or outpatients. The mean age of the cases ranged between 23.0 years to 43.0 years for patients and 23.8 years to 42.0 years for controls. Meanwhile, the mean education and duration of illness of the patients ranged from 10.0 years to 12.8 years and 1.0 year to 18.2 years, respectively. In terms of drug history, the patients in all but 2 studies were medicated at the time of assessment. In general, the patients from different studies had received one or combination of these therapies: antipsychotic drugs, antidepressant, antiparkinsonian, minor tranquilizers and mood stabilizers.

Data analysis

The cognitive functional areas assessed by TMT-A and TMT-B are the psychomotor processing speed and cognitive flexibility, respectively. All analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) version 2 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). Depending on the Q statistic value, either the fixed or random effects model were adopted to calculate the effect sizes (ESs) and 95% confidence. In this study, the ESs were analyzed as standardized difference in means (SMDs). Then, the SMDs of TMT data was used to determine the probability of superiority (PS) [40]. The mean time for TMT-A and B completions were compared to the standard. The standard average time to complete TMT-A and B are 29 seconds and 75 seconds, respectively. However, the cognitive functioning was considered deficit if the time to complete TMT-A and B exceeds 78 seconds and 273 seconds, respectively. If the heterogeneity was considered non-trivial, a random effects model was applied in the meta-analysis. Otherwise, a fixed effects model would be utilized. The heterogeneity between studies was quantified using I-squared (I2) and tau-squared (τ2) [41]. I2 describes the percentage of observed variance across studies which caused by heterogeneity rather than chance [42]. The magnitude of heterogeneity is divided into 3 levels, which are low (I2≤25%), moderate (25%< I2≤50%) and high (I2>50%). Meanwhile, τ2 indicates the actual variance between-studies in the random effects model. Subgroup analyses based on the presence or absence of substance abuse disorder, patients’ clinical status (inpatient or outpatient), the duration of their education and illness were conducted in the presence of heterogeneity. The difference in the mean completion time for each subgroups was examined using the Student’s t-test with SPSS 14.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) with the significant differences at p<0.050.


Psychomotor processing speed

Four case-control studies for a total of 441 subjects were included in this analysis. The comparison between 273 schizophrenia patients and 168 healthy controls generated SMD=-0.89 [random effect, 95% CI (-1.35, -0.42), Z=-3.729, p=0.000] with I2=78% and PS=0.74 (Figure 2). These results demonstrated that there was a significant reduction in psychomotor processing speed among patients with schizophrenia with a high probability (74%) to identify a schizophrenia patient suffering deficit in processing speed compared to healthy controls. However, there was a significantly (p=0.003) high heterogeneity between the studies of which 78% of the observed variance might be caused by the actual difference in the effect size rather than random error.
To determine the mean for completion of TMT-A among the schizophrenia patients, 827 patients were included in the analysis (Figure 3). The calculated mean was 51.05 [random effect, 95% CI (46.64, 55.46), Z=22.700, p=0.000] with I2=88%. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity test showed a significant (p=0.000) dispersion across the effect size. Thus, subgroup analyses were performed. All analyses showed that substance abuse, education and clinical status and duration of illness caused insignificant (p>0.050) differences on the mean of TMT-A completion time (Table 2). We also found that the drug naïve patients in the study of Huang et al. [38] spent longer time (7.08 seconds) than overall patients in completing TMT-A test.

Executive function (cognitive flexibility)

A total of 7 case-control studies were included in this analysis. The SMD for the comparison between 457 schizophrenia patients and 309 healthy controls was -0.96 [95% CI (-1.23, -0.70)] and this value was statistically significant (random effect, Z=-7.095, p=0.000) with I2= 64% and PS= 0.75, indicating that patients’ cognitive flexibility was impaired (Figure 4).
Meanwhile, the mean for overall patients’ TMT-B was 126.28 [random effect, 95% CI (105.69, 146.87), Z=12.021, p=0.000] with I2= 98% (Figure 5). Due to the high magnitude of heterogeneity between studies, subgroup analyses were conducted (Table 3). However, all the differences in the mean completion time obtained from subgroup analyses for TMT-B were insignificant (p>0.050). However, the completion time for drug naïve patients [38] was 11.97 seconds faster than the overall patients.


As supported by other studies [43-45], current meta-analysis study demonstrated that psychomotor processing speed and cognitive flexibility of schizophrenia patients were significantly impaired compared to the healthy controls. In addition, meta-analysis of TMT-A and B scores obtained from drug naïve schizophrenia patients also demonstrated that they performed worse than the healthy controls [46]. Based on the calculated mean time of completion of TMT-A and B in the current study, we can conclude that patients’ cognitive performances were below average but did not fall in the deficit category. Cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia patients may caused by genetic and socio-demographic factors [47-51].
Cognitive performances in schizophrenia has been associated with the synchronization of neuronal activity in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus [52]. Cognitive flexibility is controlled by dopaminergic, serotonergic and cholinergic systems [53]. Interaction of serotonergic system with other neurotransmitter systems mediates modulatory effects on cognitive performances [54]. Drug abuse can be a risk factor of schizophrenia manifestation or as a consequence of the underlying schizophrenia neuropathology. Drugs abuse and cognitive impairments in schizophrenia might be attributed to the shared mechanisms [55]. Due to the antipsychotic medications, the dopamine (DA) neurotransmission will be interfered as a result of the D2 receptor blockade in nucleus accumbens and ventral pallidum, leading to anhedonia [55]. Consequently, in order to compensate the induced anhedonia, patients may seek for drug abuse which leads to the aggravation of negative symptoms and cognitive deficits [55]. In addition, even in individual without schizophrenia manifestation, drug intoxication from the use of cocaine, methamphetamine and marijuana can cause psychotic episodes as a result of excess DA in nucleus accumbens and striatal as well as DA deficit in prefrontal cortex [54]. Contradictory to previous findings [56,57], our study showed that there was no effect of concurrent drug abuse on the patients’ cognitive performances. However, after the subdivision, the I2 and τ2 values were reduced compared with the overall analysis for each TMT. Nevertheless, the τ2 values for the substance abuse subgroup remained high, due to the inclusion of mixed group of patients in the subgroup analysis of substance abuse. Approximately 73% of the patients were concurrent substance abuser. Thus, the overall score for both tasks might not fully reflect their cognitive performance.
Years of formal schooling will reflect the pre-morbid functioning, intellectual level and higher level of information-processing skills in patients [13]. It has been demonstrated that longer duration of formal education will give positive impact on several cognitive domains such as vigilance, executive function, memory and constructional ability [13]. Although we did not find significant effect of duration of education on both cognitive domains, our results are suggestive of the idea that education affects executive function more strongly than processing speed.
In addition, hospitalization will also affect the cognitive functions of schizophrenia patients. As shown by the results from analysis of TMT-B, outpatients without concurrent substance abuse performed better than inpatients. This observation complements previous findings [58], which indicated a correlation between hospitalization and cognitive regression development. Additionally, delirium, treatment, anxiety and depression during hospitalization could be potential contributors to the relationship between hospitalization and cognitive decline.
Last but not least, we found that duration of illness had only a small effect on cognitive performances of the patients. Patients with longer duration of illness exhibited only slightly larger means of TMT completion time. Another study also demonstrated that cognitive impairment began at the illness onset and remained stable throughout the illness course [8]. Moreover, Srinivasan and colleagues found that most of the neuropsychological batteries used to measure cognitive functions in schizophrenia were stable over a range periods of illness [13].
Our study has several limitations. We were unable to investigate the correlation between schizophrenia subtypes or spectrums and patient’s processing speed as well as cognitive flexibility due to the lack of studies concerning these subjects. In addition, we could not compare the TMT scores between medicated and drug naive patients. We could only compare the mean of overall data for each TMT test with the results for drug naïve patients obtained by Huang et al. [38] Our comparison showed that drug naïve patients had slower performance to complete TMT-A but better performance in TMT-B. This is because treatment with typical and/or atypical antipsychotics might have an impact on TMT scores. This is because, typical antipsychotics usually antagonize D2 receptors due to their high affinity towards the receptors [59] while most atypical antipsychotics block either only D2 receptors or concurrently antagonize HTR2A and D2 receptors [60]. The blocking of D2 receptors, especially by typical antipsychotics may lead to Parkinsonian side effects and tardive dyskenia, as a result of the drug accumulation in the brain tissue [61]. This in turns may lead to difficulty for the patients to complete the TMT as this test is highly reflected by motor rigidity.
In conclusion, the current meta-analysis study indicated that the cognitive function of schizophrenia patients measured by TMT-A and B were impaired compared to healthy controls. Substance abuse, patients’ clinical status, duration of education as well as illness showed only small effects on the tasks’ scores. These findings demonstrated that the studied variables may not affect the patients’ TMT scores greatly.

Figure 1.
Study ascertainment diagram. TMT-A: Trail Making Test A, TMT-B: Trail Making Test B.
Figure 2.
Measures of cognitive processing speed using TMT-A. Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI). The diamond represents the point estimate for the effect size. The vertical line represents the reference of no difference in means between the schizophrenia (Scz) group and healthy control (HC) group. df: degree of freedom, PS: probability of superiority, std diff: standardized difference, τ2 : tausquared. TMT-A: Trail Making Test A.
Figure 3.
Means of TMT-A completion time for all schizophrenia patients. Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI). The diamond represents the point estimate for the mean effect size. The vertical lines represent the standard reference of mean for normal (black line) and deficient (gray line) cognitive performance. df: degree of freedom, τ2 : tau-squared. TMT-A: Trail Making Test A.
Figure 4.
Measure of cognitive flexibility using TMT-B. Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI). The diamond represents the point estimate for the effect size. The vertical line represents the reference of no difference in means between the schizophrenia (Scz) group and healthy control (HC) group. df: degree of freedom, std diff: standardized difference, τ2 : tau-squared. TMT-B: Trail Making Test B.
Figure 5.
Means of TMT-B completion time for schizophrenia patients only. Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI). The diamond represents the point estimate for the mean effect size. The vertical lines represent the standard reference of mean for normal (black line) and deficient (gray line) cognitive performance. df: degree of freedom, τ2 : tau-squared. TMT-B: Trail Making Test B.
Table 1.
Characteristics of studies included in the present meta-analysis
Authors TMT-A(N) TMT-B(N) Mean age (years) % Male Patients status Education (years) Duration of illness (years) Psychopathological evaluation Patients medication Schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis Substance abused
Katsanis and Iacono [22] 65 Scz 65 Scz 28.15 87 Inpatients NA 9.51 BPRS: 33.53 62 Scz on antipsychotics 65 Chronic schizophrenia No
GAF: 36.74 44 Scz on AP agents
NSI: 5.33 4 Scz on lithium carbonate
PSI: 6.93 4 Scz on AD
12 Scz on minor tranquilizers
Goldberg et al. [23] NA 57 Scz 34.00 53 Inpatients NA 11.1 BPRS 13 Scz on antipsychotics 57 Schizophrenia No
Positive symptoms: 21.1 15 Scz on antipsychotics and AD
Negative symptoms: 9.2 1 Scz on lithium
11 Scz on lithium and antipsychotics
3 Scz on AD
1 Scz on others
3 Scz drug naive
Lapierre et al. [24] 31 Scz 31 Scz 36.00 100 Outpatients 10 NA PANSSP: 13 All Scz on several psychiatric medications 31 Schizophrenia Yes (16/31)
15 HC 15 HC 33.87 67 19.17 None
Docherty et al. [25] NA 26 Scz 32.00 80 Outpatients 13 10 GAF: 53 All Scz on antipsychotics 26 Stable schizophrenia No
8 Scz on typical antipsychotics
18 Scz on atypical antipsychotics
9 Scz on AP agents
6 Scz on MS
12 Scz on others
van der Gaag et al. [26] (a) 21 Scz 21 Scz 30.40 62 Inpatients Scale: 4.3 9.9 NA All on stable antipsychotics 21 Schizophrenia No
6 Scz on clozapine
36 Scz on typical antipsychotics
van der Gaag et al. [26] (b) 21 Scz 21 Scz 31.70 67 Inpatients Scale: 4.7 9.6 NA 21 Schizophrenia No
Martínez-Arán et al. [27] 49 Scz 49 Scz 30.40 78 Outpatients 11.3 NA GAF: 69.8 45 Scz on typical antipsychotics 49 Schizophrenia No
PANSSP: 11.5 4 Scz on atypical antipsychotics
PANSSN: 22.5 22 Scz on AD
4 Scz on MS
Velligan et al. [28] (a) 15 Scz 15 Scz 39.33 53 Outpatients 11.2 NA BPRS positive: 2.62 13 Scz on atypical antipsychotics 11 Schizophrenia/4 Schizoaffective disorder Yes (2/15)
NSA total: 72.47
Velligan et al. [28] (b) 15 Scz 15 Scz 38.93 60 Outpatients 11.2 NA BPRS positive: 3.32 10 Scz on atypical antipsychotics 11 Schizophrenia/4 Schizoaffective disorder Yes (2/15)
NSA total: 70.40
Holthausen et al. [29] 118 Scz 118 Scz 23.30 74 NA Scale: 4 NA PANSSP*: 2.22 25 Scz on typical antipsychotics 84 Schizophrenia/15 Schizoaffective disorder/19 Schizophreniform disorder Yes (99/118)
PANSSN*: 2.33 75 Scz on atypical antipsychotics
45 HC 45 HC 24.00 84 Scale: 5.4 None 18 Scz did not use antipsychotics
10 Scz on AC
Pukrop et al. [30] NA 66 Scz 30.10 70 Inpatients NA NA PANSSP: 16.5 35 Scz unmedicated 61 Paranoid/2 Disorganized/3 Undifferentiated schizophrenia No
PANSSN: 20.1 4 Scz on typical antipsychotic
NA 45 HC 29.60 31 NA None 27 Scz on atypical antipsychotics
Combs and Qouvier [31] 65 Scz 65 Scz 40.7 55 NA 11.2 18.2 BPRS: 53.8 15 Scz on typical antipsychotics 65 Chronic schizophrenia No
34 Scz on atypical antipsychotics
16 Scz on both antipsychotics
36 Scz on AC agents
Herman [17] (a) 35 Scz 35 Scz 42.17 N.a. Inpatients 10.9 NA BPRS: 55.55 12 Scz on typical antipsychotics 35 Schizophrenia No
32 Scz on atypical antipsychotics
Herman [17] (b) 44 Scz 43 Scz 30.86 N.a. Inpatients 11.26 NA BPRS: 45.60 13 Scz on typical antipsychotics 44 Schizophrenia Yes (44/44)
33 Scz on atypical antipsychotics
Docherty [32] 47 Scz 47 Scz 43.00 83 Inpatients 13 NA BPRS: 49 NA 47 Schizophrenia No
GAF: 42
36 HC 36 HC 42.00 39 14 None
Keri et al. [33] NA 72 Scz NA 65 Outpatients N.a. NA BPRS: 30.4 20 Scz on typical antipsychotics 72 Schizophrenia No
NA 60 HC NA 67 N.a. None 51 Scz on atypical antipsychotics
Mortimer et al. [34] (a) 9 Scz 8 Scz N.a. NA NA NA NA BPRS: 30.8 (N=ll) Patients on antipsychotics, AD, AC and/or benzodiazepine medications (N=NA) Schizophrenia/Schizophreniform disorder NA
Predominant positive symptomatology
Mortimer et al. [34] (b) 14Scz 14 Scz N.a. NA NA NA NA BPRS score: 35.3 (N=16) (N=NA) Schizophrenia/S chizophreniform disorder NA
Predominant positive symptomatology
Thornton et al. [35] 48 Scz 47 Scz 35.90 64 Inpatients 11.4 14.5 NA 44 Scz on antipsychotic medication 39 Schizophrenia/11 Schizoaffective disorder No
Yi et al. [36] (a) 9 Scz 9 Scz 41.40 78 Outpatients 12.3 NA PANSSP: 14.4 Patients on antipsychotics (N=NA) Schizophrenia/Schizoaffective disorder No
PANSSN: 14.6
Yi et al. [36] (b) 10 Scz 10 Scz 39.70 70 Outpatients 12.8 NA PANSSP: 13.9 Patients on antipsychotics (N=NA) Schizophrenia/Schizoaffective disorder No
PANSSN: 17.5
Hasan et al. [37] (a) 73 Scz 71 Scz 36.40 86 Inpatients and outpatients 11.5 NA PANSSP: 14.2 (N=67) Patients on stable antipsychotics 73 schizophrenia No
PANSSN: 25.6 (N=68)
Hasan et al. [37] (b) 78 Scz 76 Scz 35.50 72 Inpatients and outpatients 11.2 NA PANSSP: 13.0 (N=71) Patients on stable antipsychotics 78 schizophrenia No
PANSSN: 25.2 (N=74)
Huang et al. [38] 92 Scz 92 Scz 22.86 39 NA 10.77 12.26 PANSSP: 23.88 Drug naive 92 first-episode schizophrenia NA
PANSSN: 19.30
57 HC 57 HC 23.84 42 11.77 None
Schuepbach et al. [39] 15 Scz 15 Scz 33.20 67 10 inpatients and 5 outpatients 12.77 10.43 BPRS: 36.53 Patients on antipsychotics 15 chronic schizophrenia No
15 HC 15 HC 33.87 67 19.17 None 4 Scz on AD and/or MS

* standardized PANSS ratings ranging from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme).

AC: anticholinergic, AD: antidepressant, AP: antiparkinsonian, BPRS: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, GAF: Global Assessment of Functioning, HC: healthy controls, MS: mood stabilizers, N: total number, NA: not available, NSI: Negative Symptom Index, PANSSN: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Negative, PANSSP: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Positive, PSI: Positive Symptom Index, Scz: schizophrenia patients

Table 2.
Summary of subgroup analyses for TMT-A in schizophrenia patients
Subgroups Mean and 95% CI p-value Sample size τ2 I2 (%) Q-value df (Q)
Concurrent substance abuse
 a. Absent 48.02 [43.08, 52.97] 0.112 489 59.86 86 76.24 11**
 b. Present 58.94 [36.83, 81.05] 223 127.69 90 41.94 4**
Education (without concurrent substance abuse)
 a. 12 years and below 47.14 [39.40, 54.89] 0.482 348 85.09 92 68.27 5**
 b. More than 12 years 50.87 [43.91, 57.84] 34 38.85 50 4.02 4
Patients’ clinical status (without concurrent substance abuse)
 a. Inpatients 47.89 [42.38, 52.59] 0.301 190 21.21 66 11.88 4*
 b. Outpatients 51.31 [45.21, 57.41] 68 20.15 38 3.25 2
Duration of illness
 a. 10 years and below 50.07 [43.92, 56.22] 0.872 199 24.18 64 8.24 2*
 b. More than 10 years 49.35 [35.35, 63.35] 128 139.41 94 31.20 2**

* p<0.050,

** p<0.001.

CI: confidence interval, df: degree of freedom, τ2: tau-squared, TMT-A: Trail Making Test A

Table 3.
Summary of schizophrenia patients’ subgroup analyses for TMT-B
Subgroups Mean and 95% CI p-value Sample size τ2 I2 (%) Q-value df (Q)
Concurrent substance abuse
 a. Absent 123.08 [103.99,142.18] 0.779 710 492.67 90 138.76 14**
 b. Present 127.63 [57.45,197.81] 222 6,114.36 97 149.64 4**
Education (without concurrent substance abuse)
 a. 12 years and below 132.01 [102.47,161.55] 0.675 343 1,258.86 95 101.66 5**
 b. More than 12 years 121.38 [94.95,147.81] 107 755.77 85 27.08 4**
Patients’ clinical status (without concurrent substance abuse)
 a. Inpatients 140.41 [91.83,188.98] 0.29 317 1,101.09 93 76.49 5**
 b. Outpatients 116.22 [100.26,132.18] 166 46.34 32 5.92 4
Duration of illness
 a. 10 years and below 114.22 [104.61,123.82] 0.686 183 85.9 0 0.095 2
 b. More than 10 years 118.59 [96.44,140.75] 184 448.41 88 25.26 3**

** p<0.001.

CI: confidence interval, df: degree of freedom, τ2: tau-squared, TMT-B: Trail Making Test B


1. Bora E, Yücel M, Pantelis C. Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia and affective psychoses: implications for DSM-5 criteria and beyond. Schizophr Bull 2010;36:36-42.
2. Heinrichs RW, Zakzanis KK. Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: a quantitative review of the evidence. Neuropsychology 1998;12:426-445.
3. Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Cognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2006;2:531-536.
pmid pmc
4. Tombaugh TN. Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004;19:203-214.
5. Kortte KB, Horner MD, Windham WK. The Trail Making Test, Part B: cognitive Flexibility or Ability to Maintain Set? Appl Neuropsychol 2002;9:106-109.
6. Fucetola R, Seidman LJ, Kremen WS, Faraone SV, Goldstein JM, Tsuang MT. Age and neuropsychologic function in schizophrenia: a decline in executive abilities beyond that observed in healthy volunteers. Biol Psychiatry 2000;48:137-146.
7. Leung A, Chue P. Sex differences in schizophrenia, a review of the literature. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 2000;401:3-38.
8. Velligan DI, Miller AL. Cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia and its importance to outcome: the place of atypical antipsychotics in treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;60:25-28.

9. Berman I, Viegner B, Merson A, Allan E, Pappas D, Green AI. Differential relationships between positive and negative symptoms and neuropsychological deficits in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1997;25:1-10.
10. Cuesta MJ, Peralta V, Zarzuela A. Illness duration and neuropsychological impairments in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1998;33:141-150.
11. Kalwa A, Rzewuska M, Borkowska A. Cognitive dysfunction progression in schizophrenia-Relation to functional and clinical outcome. Arch Psychiatry Psychother 2012;1:5-13.

12. Rajji TK, Ismail Z, Mulsant BH. Age at onset and cognition in schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2009;195:286-293.
13. Srinivasan L, Thara R, Tirupati SN. Cognitive dysfunction and associated factors in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Indian J Psychiatry 2005;47:139-143.
pmid pmc
14. Spreen O, Strauss E. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms and Commentary. 2nd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.

15. Mitrushina M, Boone KB, Razani J, D’Elia LF. Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment. 2nd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

16. Swofford CD, Kasckow JW, Scheller-Gilkey G, Inderbitzin LB. Substance use: a powerful predictor of relapse in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1996;20:145-151.
17. Herman M. Neurocognitive functioning and quality of life among dually diagnosed and non-substance abusing schizophrenia inpatients. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2004;13:282-291.
18. Cooper L, Liberman D, Tucker D, Neuchterlein KH, Tsuang J, Barnett HL. Neurocognitive deficits in the dually diagnosed with schizophrenia and cocaine abuse. Psychiatr Rehabil Skill 1999;3:231-245.

19. Pencer A, Addington J. Substance use and cognition in early psychosis. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2003;28:48-54.
pmid pmc
20. Ivleva E, Morris D, Osuji J, Moates A, Carmody TJ, Thaker GK, et al. Cognitive endophenotypes of psychosis within dimension and diagnosis. Psychiatry Res 2012;196:38-44.
pmid pmc
21. Burdick KE, Goldberg JF, Harrow M, Faull RN, Malhotra AK. Neurocognition as a stable endophenotype in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis 2006;194:255-260.
22. Katsanis J, Iacono WG. Clinical, neuropsychological, and brain structural correlates of smooth-pursuit eye tracking performance in chronic schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol 1991;100:526-534.
23. Goldberg TE, Gold JM, Greenberg R, Griffin S, Schulz SC, Pickar D, et al. Contrasts between patients with affective disorders and patients with schizophrenia on a neuropsychological test battery. Am J Psychiatry 1993;150:1355-1362.
24. Lapierre D, Braun CMJ, Hodgins S, Toupin J, Léveillée S, Constantineau C. Neuropsychological correlates of violence in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1995;21:253-262.
25. Docherty NM, Hall MJ, Gordinier SW, Cutting LP. Conceptual sequencing and disordered speech in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2000;26:723-735.
26. van der Gaag M, Kern RS, van den Bosch RJ, Liberman RP. A controlled trial of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2002;28:167-176.
27. Martínez-Arán A, Penadés R, Vieta E, Colom F, Reinares M, Benabarre A, et al. Executive function in patients with remitted bipolar disorder and schizophrenia and its relationship with functional outcome. Psychother Psychosom 2002;71:39-46.
28. Velligan DI, Prihoda TJ, Ritch JL, Maples N, Bow-Thomas CC, Dassori A. A randomized single-blind pilot study of compensatory strategies in schizophrenia outpatients. Schizophr Bull 2002;28:283-292.
29. Holthausen EAE, Wiersma D, Sitskoorn MM, Dingemans PM, Schene AH, van den Bosch RJ. Long-term memory deficits in schizophrenia: primary or secondary dysfunction? Neuropsychology 2003;17:539-547.
30. Pukrop R, Matuschek E, Ruhrmann S, Brockhaus-Dumke A, Tendolkar I, Bertsch A, et al. Dimensions of working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2003;62:259-268.
31. Combs DR, Qouvier WD. The role of attention in affect perception : an examination of Mirsky’s four factor model of attention in chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2004;30:727-738.
crossref pmid pdf
32. Docherty NM. Cognitive impairments and disordered speech in schizophrenia: thought disorder, disorganization, and communication failure perspectives. J Abnorm Psychol 2005;114:269-278.
crossref pmid pdf
33. Kéri S, Kelemen O, Janka Z, Benedek G. Visual-perceptual dysfunctions are possible endophenotypes of schizophrenia: evidence from the psychophysical investigation of magnocellular and parvocellular pathways. Neuropsychology 2005;19:649-656.
crossref pmid pdf
34. Mortimer AM, Joyce E, Balasubramaniam K, Choudhary PC, Saleem PT. Treatment with amisulpride and olanzapine improve neuropsychological function in schizophrenia. Hum Psychopharmacol 2007;22:445-454.
crossref pmid
35. Thornton AE, Boudreau VG, Griffiths SY, Woodward TS, Fawkes-Kirby T, Honer WG. The impact of monetary reward on memory in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Neuropsychology 2007;21:631-645.
crossref pmid pdf
36. Yi Z, Fan X, Wang JJ, Liu D, Freudenreich O, Goff D, et al. Rosiglitazone and cognitive function in clozapine-treated patients with schizophrenia: a pilot study. Psychiatry Res 2012;200:79-82.
crossref pmid
37. Hasan A, Guse B, Cordes J, Wölwer W, Winterer G, Gaebel W, et al. Cognitive effects of high-frequency rTMS in schizophrenia patients with predominant negative symptoms: results from a multicenter randomized sham-controlled trial. Schizophr Bull 2016;42:608-618.
crossref pmid pdf
38. Huang M, Huang Y, Yu L, Hu J, Chen J, Jin P, et al. Relationship between negative symptoms and neurocognitive functions in adolescent and adult patients with first-episode schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry 2016;16:344.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
39. Schuepbach D, Egger ST, Boeker H, Duschek S, Vetter S, Seifritz E, et al. Determinants of cerebral hemodynamics during the Trail Making Test in schizophrenia. Brain Cogn 2016;109:96-104.
crossref pmid
40. Grissom RJ. Probability of the superior outcome of one treatment over another. J Appl Psychol 1994;79:314-316.
41. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Rothstein H. Meta-analysis: Fixed effect vs. random effects. Available at: Accessed November 5, 2017.

42. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560.
crossref pmid pmc
43. Bora E, Pantelis C. Meta-analysis of cognitive impairment in first-episode bipolar disorder: comparison with first-episode schizophrenia and healthy controls. Schizophr Bull 2015;41:1095-1104.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
44. Fioravanti M, Bianchi V, Cinti ME. Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: an updated metanalysis of the scientific evidence. BMC Psychiatry 2012;12:1-20.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
45. Periáñez JA, Ríos-Lago M, Rodríguez-Sánchez JM, Adrover-Roig D, Sánchez-Cubillo I, Crespo-Facorro B, et al. Trail Making Test in traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and normal ageing: sample comparisons and normative data. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2007;22:433-447.
crossref pmid pdf
46. Fatouros-Bergman H, Cervenka S, Flyckt L, Edman G, Fard L. Metaanalysis of cognitive performance in drug-naïve patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2014;158:156-162.
crossref pmid
47. Kuha A, Tuulio-Henriksson A, Eerola M, Perälä J, Suvisaari J, Partonen T, et al. Impaired executive performance in healthy siblings of schizophrenia patients in a population-based study. Schizophr Res 2007;92:142-150.
crossref pmid
48. Wright B, Peters E, Ettinger U, Kuipers E, Kumari V. Effects of environmental noise on cognitive (dys)functions in schizophrenia: a pilot within-subjects experimental study. Schizophr Res 2016;173:101-108.
crossref pmid pmc
49. Talreja BT, Shah S, Kataria L. Cognitive function in schizophrenia and its association with socio-demographics factors. Ind Psychiatry J 2013;22:47-53.
crossref pmid pmc
50. Gray JA, Roth BL. Molecular targets for treating cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2007;33:1100-1119.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
51. Harvey PD. The genetics of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 2008;5:65-67.
pmid pmc
52. Puig MV, Gener T. Serotonin modulation of prefronto-hippocampal rhythms in fealth and disease. ACS Chem Neurosci 2015;6:1017-1025.
crossref pmid
53. Logue SF, Gould TJ. The neural and genetic basis of executive function: attention, cognitive flexibility, and response inhibition. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2014;123:45-54.
crossref pmid
54. Štrac DŠ, Pivac N, Mück-Šeler D. The serotonergic system and cognitive function. Transl Neurosci 2016;7:35-49.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
55. Volkow ND. Substance use disorders in schizophrenia--clinical implications of comorbidity. Schizophr Bull 2009;35:469-472.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
56. Yücel M, Bora E, Lubman DI, Solowij N, Brewer WJ, Cotton SM, et al. The impact of cannabis use on cognitive functioning in patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of existing findings and new data in a first-episode sample. Schizophr Bull 2012;38:316-330.
crossref pmid pdf
57. Sevy S, Kay SR, Opler LA, van Praag HM. Significance of cocaine history in schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis 1990;178:642-648.
crossref pmid
58. Mathews SB, Arnold SE, Epperson CN. Hospitalization and cognitive decline: can the nature of the relationship be deciphered? Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2014;22:465-840.
crossref pmid
59. Dixon LB, Lehman AF, Levine J. Conventional antipsychotic medications for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1995;21:567-577.
crossref pmid pdf
60. Deutch AY, Noghaddam B, Innis RB, Krystal JH, Aghajanian GK, Bunney BS, et al. Mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotic drugs: Implications for novel therapeutic strategies for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1991;4:121-156.
crossref pmid
61. Seeman P. Atypical antipsychotics: mechanism of action. Can J Psychiatry 2002;47:27-38.
crossref pmid


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
#522, 27, Seochojungang-ro 24-gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06601, Korea
Tel: +82-2-537-6171    Fax: +82-2-537-6174    E-mail:                

Copyright © 2018 by Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2community

Close layer
prev next