Psychiatry Investig Search

CLOSE


Psychiatry Investig > Volume 21(11); 2024 > Article
Hwang, Lee, Hwang, Sim, Kim, and Kim: Psychiatric Considerations of Infertility

Abstract

Objective

Infertility, the inability to achieve pregnancy within a year despite normal attempts to conceive without contraception, causes psychosocial burden for individuals and couples. This review summarized the interrelationship between infertility and psychological stress and suggested various forms of psychological intervention for infertility.

Methods

The PubMed, Google Scholar, and Korean Studies Information Service System databases were searched for English- and Korean-language articles published from 1990 to 2024.

Results

Infertility leads to emotional distress from diagnosis to treatment. Also, psychological stress affects the trajectory of infertility. This distress may cause psychiatric illnesses, negatively affecting pregnancy. Psychotherapies, psychopharmacotherapies, and biological treatments can be used for the management of psychiatric illnesses in infertile patients. Digital therapeutics also have the potential to be a competitive treatment option.

Conclusion

Regular assessment and management of psychological stress in infertile couples are essential during the course of infertility treatment. Psychological intervention of infertile patients should be implemented according to a personalized plan that completely reflects the individual clinical characteristics.

INTRODUCTION

Infertility is the inability to achieve pregnancy within 1 year despite normal attempts to conceive without contraception [1], and can cause major psychosocial distress for individuals, their families, and communities. The World Health Organization recognizes infertility as a global public health concern, reporting that over 186 million people worldwide experience infertility [2].
In South Korea, the number of women infertile patients increased from more than 146,000 in 2017 to more than 163,000 in 2021, an 11.4% increase in merely 4 years [3]. he rate of infertility in South Korea was 13.2% as of 2015, which is extremely high compared to 6.7% in the U.S., 8.6% in the U.K., and 8.0% in Germany [4]. The most likely cause of this increase in rate of infertility is South Korea’s rapid economic development and social change, which has increased the level of women’s education and labor participation, delaying marriage and childbirth [5]. As many South Korean women prioritize economic security and career building, they consider marriage and childbirth after their mid-30s, and this period coincides with a period of biologically higher risk of infertility, contributing substantially to the rising infertility rate [6].
Despite the rapid economic and social changes in modern South Korean society, influence of Confucian thought is still deeply rooted in individual lives and societal expectations. Specifically, it remains an important value in Korean life that when a man and woman marry, they must have children and start a family. This sociocultural context is particularly burdensome for couples struggling with infertility. Although Confucian values are less appreciated by young generations, having children is more than just a personal choice in Confucian values; it is seen as a way to continue the family line and fulfill social obligations. Therefore, if Confucian values affect negatively on fertility rate, relevant interventions may include those alleviating stigmata from such values. Couples experiencing infertility, especially women, experience psychological pressure between social criticism and internal guilt. The psychological distress experienced by infertile women is significant because Korean society, where traditional gender role stereotypes are still deeply rooted, still emphasizes the role of motherhood [7]. Until recently, South Korean mass media portrayed infertile couples as incomplete families based on the family norms embedded in Confucian values, and reported that the psychological pressure on women who are unable to have children is particularly severe, leading to psychiatric disorders such as depressive disorders and anxiety disorders [6,7].
Infertility is deeply connected to psychosocial as well as cultural issues [8]. Women experience considerable psychological distress from the moment they are diagnosed with infertility, through the treatment process, and even after conception with miscarriages and maintenance of pregnancy. Women with infertility often experience anxiety and depression. It has been reported that 21%-52% of women with infertility experience depression, which can make it difficult to progress with the infertility treatment and can sometimes lead to treatment discontinuation [9].
Thus, this review will comprehensively examine the impact of infertility on the mental health of women and married couples, exploring how various emotional distresses affect infertility status and treatment. It will also introduce effective psychological intervention strategies for those who are emotionally distressed due to infertility.

METHODS

This study conducted a comprehensive literature search using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Korean Studies Information Service System databases, focusing on articles published between 1990 and 2024. The primary search terms included “infertility,” “psychological stress,” “psychological intervention,” “psychotherapy,” “psychopharmacotherapy,” and “digital therapeutics.” Studies were selected based on their relevance to the relationship between infertility and psychological stress, and their focus on psychological intervention for infertility patients. English- and Korean-language articles were reviewed, and duplicate studies were removed. After screening titles and abstracts, the most relevant studies were analyzed to summarize findings on the impact of psychological stress on infertility and the effectiveness of psychological intervention approaches.

Emotional distress in infertility

Emotional distress due to infertility not only exacerbates a woman’s infertility issues from a physical perspective but also imposes a huge psychological strain on women hoping to conceive [10]. Infertility can increase emotional concerns such as depression and anxiety, and these psychological conditions can interfere with infertility treatment [11]. Therefore, recognizing the emotional aspects of infertility in time and managing them effectively is imperative to overcoming infertility [12].
According to research, the overall prevalence of anxiety and depression in infertile couples is estimated between 25%-60%. This rate is significantly higher compared to fertile couples and the general population. These statistics clearly demonstrate the severe psychological impact of infertility and underscore the importance of tailored mental health support in the infertility treatment process [13].

Emotional distress from infertility and treatments in women

Infertility is accompanied by many forms of physical difficulties as well as psychological distress, ranging from the difficulty in conceiving to giving birth. The prevalence of depressed mood in women undergoing infertility has been reported to be similar to that in patients with heart disease [10]. Recent studies have demonstrated that the prevalence of depression in women with infertility is increasing and can be as high as 40% in contrast to the general population [12]. In reality, being infertile leads to a deep sense of loss, low self-esteem, and loss of identity, and these feelings can cause depression. Simionescu et al. [14] discovered that infertility can lead to social isolation and psychological distress, leading to reduced interaction with family and friends, which can intensify feelings of loneliness and depression. As infertility persists, a woman may experience loss of interest, gradually withdrawing from socializing, and experience difficulty with daily activities, consequently losing social adaptability [15]. The resulting ongoing distress can bring about a vicious cycle of infertility, especially a chronic stage.
The infertility treatment process itself also triggers significant emotional stress. The invasive nature of infertility treatments and uncertainty about treatment outcomes can cause considerable psychological distress. This process requires women to not only endure physical but also emotional strain, which tends to increase distress. This has a negative impact on the mental health and overall quality of life of infertile women. Massarotti et al. [16] reported that high levels of anxiety and depression among women undergoing infertility treatment act as a psychological burden during the infertility treatment process, directly contributing to negative treatment outcomes. Conversely, unsuccessful infertility treatments can also have a negative impact on the overall quality of life and self-esteem of infertile women. These failures can cause tension in the interpersonal relationships of women and, in some cases, increase their social isolation [17]. If the emotional stress of the infertility treatment process is prolonged, it can lead to prolonged depression. Joseph and Whirledge [18] emphasized the importance of long-term mental health support as women may experience persistent mental health issues even after completion of infertility treatment. Thus, it is important to assess and manage emotional distress in infertile women in the long term as well as the short term.

Impact of psychosocial stress on infertility and infertility treatments in women

Psychological stress can disrupt female sex hormonal balance by promoting the release of stress hormones such as cortisol, which may affect the signaling pathways that regulate reproductive function [19]. These conditions can hamper the functioning of the immune system, which can trigger an inflammatory response, negatively impacting the reproductive health [20]. Elevated cortisol levels, commonly a result of both acute and chronic stress, can impair these signaling pathways further, disrupting functions including ovulation, fertilization, and embryo implantation. This primarily affects the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, leading to decreased production of gonadotropins and subsequently reduced fertility potential [21].
Psychosocial stress can affect the production of progesterone and estrogen, the main hormones related to the process of pregnancy [19]. These hormones play an essential role in preparing for and maintaining pregnancy, and stress-induced hormonal imbalances can contribute to infertility. Previous studies have shown that women who experience high levels of stress are at increased risk for ovulation issues and infertility [22]. Depression as a comorbidity is also strongly associated with infertility. Individuals with depression experience social isolation, difficulties in sleep, and eating problems, all of which can affect reproductive health. Specifically, depression can disrupt biological rhythms, which can disturb hormonal secretion and increase the risk of infertility [20]. Thus, psychological stress affects infertility through various pathways, manifesting as a disruption of the body’s hormonal balance and physiological processes. Therefore, emotional management is critical during a woman’s pregnancy plan.
Psychosocial stress not only affects the possibility of pregnancy but also has a significant impact on the overall process and outcome of infertility treatment. Women with high levels of psychological stress are less likely to follow prescribed infertility treatment protocols and are more likely to maintain unhealthy lifestyle habits. This can reduce the effectiveness of the treatment, consequently reducing the treatment success rate [23]. Kim et al. [24] examined factors affecting intention to continue infertility treatment among women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques and reported that patients with higher levels of emotional distress were significantly less likely to continue treatment. Thus, psychological stress can have a massive impact on women undergoing infertility treatment, causing them to discontinue treatment prematurely [25]. Assessing and managing the effect of psychosocial stress on infertility treatment is critical during the course of infertility treatment, and managing a patient’s mental health is vital to increasing the success rate of treatment. This can help patients better understand the treatment process and ensure they get the care they need (Figure 1).

Emotional distress in infertile men

Although infertility is considered primarily a women’s issue, it has a considerable impact on men as well. Social pressure to conceive can create feelings of inadequacy and failure in infertile men, which can be a powerful trigger for depression and anxiety. The prevalence of mental health issues among infertile men is known to be significant, but the problem is not easily recognized and is less likely to lead to treatment [26]. Men diagnosed with infertility often perceive their infertility status as a failure in their lives, which can lead them to experience mental health issues such as depressive disorders and anxiety disorders [26,27]. The stress from infertility makes it difficult for men to express their feelings and ask for emotional support, which creates a vicious cycle aggravating social isolation and undermining psychological stability [28]. Prolonged depression can have a serious impact on a man’s daily life, interpersonal relationships, and social functions.
Research by Wischmann and Thorn [29] highlights the psychosocial challenges faced by men dealing with infertility, emphasizing the benefits of targeted psychological interventions like cognitive behavioral therapy and support groups. These interventions are crucial as they address the unique needs of infertile men, helping to reduce feelings of isolation and improve coping strategies.
Moreover, a qualitative study by Hanna and Gough [30] delves into men’s experiences with infertility, illustrating how personalized counseling helps in navigating the complex emotions and societal pressures associated with infertility diagnoses.
In a society, men are held responsible for carrying on the family line and having children. When infertility issues prevent them from fulfilling these roles, men experience deep doubts about their “masculinity” and low self-esteem. In a social environment that is reluctant to acknowledge infertility as a men issue, it is taboo to discuss these issues openly, which can lead men to internalize their identity issues, and this can lead to serious emotional distress [31]. This internalized stress can make it more challenging for men to admit to themselves that they have infertility issues [32]. The effect of infertility on men’s psychology and emotions is complex, and understanding and coping with these issues is an important challenge for men with infertility.
Men with infertility problems often do not get the social support they need, which is a major factor that contributes to their emotional distress [33]. There is a need for tailored support programs and open dialogue for men with infertility, which can play a huge role in helping men deal with emotional issues related to infertility in a healthy manner (Figure 1).

Psychological intervention of infertility

As summarized in Table 1, several specialized treatments are available for patients with infertility experiencing clinically significant psychological stress or those with psychiatric diagnoses such as depressive disorders or anxiety disorders.

Psychotherapies

Psychotherapy is an important treatment option to alleviate the emotional stress experienced by infertile patients. Infertility causes severe stress in a patient’s life, which can often lead to depressive disorders or anxiety disorders. Psychotherapy helps to reduce this emotional burden and to improve the individual’s psychosocial functions. Individuals experiencing infertility often struggle to come to accept their difficulties, and these feelings can lead to chronic stress. Psychotherapy can help process these negative feelings and promote healthy emotional responses [34].
The main psychotherapeutic methods include cognitive behavioral therapy, behavioral activation therapy, group psychotherapy, and psychoanalysis. First, cognitive behavioral therapy teaches infertile patients how to identify and manage negative thoughts and emotions. This therapy helps patients develop healthier thought patterns during stressful situations and teaches them how to cope more effectively with stressful situations [35,36]. Behavioral activation therapy is especially useful for infertile patients with depressive symptoms and encourages patients to engage in positive activities, which can help them break negative emotional patterns and experience improvement of depressed mood [37]. As the personal activity increases, the patient’s self-esteem and confidence improves, which contributes to better overall functioning of the patient. Group psychotherapy provides an opportunity for people experiencing infertility to share their experiences and receive empathy and support. This provides participants with a sense of belonging and helps reduce isolation. Sharing experiences within a group can help patients better understand and accept their feelings [38]. Finally, psychoanalysis focuses on exploring the unconscious and early experiences of the infertile patient to understand and address the impact of infertility on the patient’s emotional state [39]. It helps patients gain a deeper understanding of their feelings and attitudes, identify connections between past experiences and current feelings, and learn how to manage the psychological stress that results from them [40].
In a study comparing cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy in women with infertility, both cognitive behavioral therapy group and pharmacotherapy group with fluoxetine reported significant improvements in depressive symptoms compared to the control group, and the cognitive behavioral therapy group exhibited more significant improvements in distress from infertility compared to the pharmacotherapy group [35].
Therefore, psychotherapy is as effective as pharmacotherapy in improving emotional functioning and reducing psychological stress, such as depression and anxiety, in infertile patients. Specifically, cognitive behavioral therapy and behavioral activation are extremely useful in reducing depression and anxiety experienced during infertility treatment, which can have a positive impact on fertility rates [41].
Finally, it is imperative to consider the individual needs and circumstances of the patient when conducting psychotherapy. Therapists need to understand the patient’s cultural and personal background and tailor their approach accordingly. Moreover, they should also periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and adjust the treatment plan as needed. Active participation from the patient and a trusting relationship with the therapist are paramount for effective psychotherapy [42].

Psychopharmacotherapies

When a woman is diagnosed with a psychiatric condition such as depressive disorders or anxiety disorders, various forms of psychotropic medication may be prescribed. Antidepressants are the most commonly used psychopharmacological drugs, effectively improving mood, reducing anxiety, and promoting emotional stability [43]. Psychopharmacotherapies include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and mood stabilizers, and, if necessary, anxiolytic medications such as benzodiazepines may also be used temporarily [44,45].
SSRIs, which are most commonly used to treat depressive disorders or anxiety disorders in infertile women, work by regulating serotonin levels in the brain to reduce depressive or anxious symptoms, ameliorating emotional difficulties and reducing psychological stress in their daily lives. However, each person’s response to the drug often varies, so consistent monitoring and tailored prescription is necessary [46].
Although SSRIs have various side effects, they are often temporary. However, side effects such as sexual dysfunction can cause a variety of challenges for women and men with infertility. Since sexual dysfunction is likely to be associated with failure of infertility treatment, which can lead to poor adherence to depression treatment in infertile patients, specialists should determine the choice of medication and dosage very carefully, and should regularly check the patient’s condition to establish an optimal treatment plan [47].
Integrative treatment combines the benefits of psychopharmacologic agents with the supportive interactions provided by psychotherapies to improve patients’ overall treatment satisfaction and outcomes. This approach can play a vital role in maximizing treatment effectiveness and preventing relapse [48].

Biological therapies

Infertile patients may be reluctant to engage in pharmacotherapies to help them achieve a successful pregnancy, even if they have comorbid depressive disorders or anxiety disorders. Electroconvulsive therapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as biological treatments, improve emotional health by regulating neurophysiological processes without the use of medication.
First, electroconvulsive therapy uses electric stimulation of the brain to rebalance neurotransmitters to relieve symptoms [49]. Recent studies such as “Predictors of Electroconvulsive Therapy Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder” (Su et al. [50]) highlight the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy, especially in treatment-resistant depression, with modern techniques reducing cognitive side effects. This could offer therapeutic benefits to patients experiencing severe psychological stress due to infertility. Electroconvulsive therapy can induce a rapid depressive symptomatic response, and therefore, can be applied to infertile patients with severe depression. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a noninvasive method that uses magnetic fields to target specific areas of the brain and can treat depressive disorders and anxiety disorders in infertile women who are reluctant to take antidepressants [51]. “Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression” (Cole et al. [52]) presents rapid remission results in severe depression, suggesting that transcranial magnetic stimulation can be a non-invasive alternative for managing infertility-related depression. Although light therapy has been used primarily to treat seasonal affective disorder, it can also promote emotional stability by resetting the biological clock and improving hormonal balance in infertile patients who experience depressive symptoms associated with lack of sunlight. Light therapy is also well known its affordability while high reliable [53,54]. Patients’ overall health and psychological state should be thoroughly evaluated before applying these biological treatments. This helps determine the suitability of the treatment and minimize side effects. Specifically, severity of depression, previous treatment response, and patient preferences must be considered. Finally, the side effects and safety of each treatment method should be explained. Common side effects include transient amnesia with electroconvulsive therapy, headaches or scalp pain with transcranial magnetic stimulation, and eye strain or headaches with light therapy; thus, it is important to take this into consideration and plan the treatment according to the patient’s condition [49-54].

Digital therapeutics

Digital therapy has gained traction as a way to manage and treat emotional stress in patients by using modern, advanced digital technologies. These therapies are conducted through a variety of digital platforms and tools, especially virtual reality (VR), mobile apps, and web-based psychotherapy programs are used. Digital therapies, including VR, mobile apps, and web platforms, support stress management anytime, anywhere. These technologies offer flexibility, tailoring treatment to individual needs [55,56].
Benefits of digital therapy include greater accessibility. They can provide specialized treatment services across time and space to anyone with internet access [57]. They are also more cost effective than traditional face-to-face therapy [55,58]. However, digital therapies may be limited in capturing emotional connection or nonverbal cues due to the lack of direct face-to-face interaction between patient and therapist, and [59] not all users are skilled in using digital technology. Therefore, for older users or those who are less technologically adept, these technological barriers may limit access to treatment. Additionally, technical errors or system failures may also interfere with the treatment process [60].
Notably, digital therapeutics for psychological stress management in infertility is just beginning and are still limited in application, but literature suggests that they are amply competitive. In a preliminary study of an internet-based psychological/physical intervention for infertile women, Clifton et al. [61] demonstrated significant reductions in depression, anxiety, and infertility stress in the intervention group compared to the control group; Bjornsdottir et al. [56] reported significant reductions in depressive symptoms and general stress as well as infertility stress after an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy program, ”Overcome Fertility Stress,” was administered to women experiencing infertility stress. Digital therapies have great potential to improve physical and mental health by effectively managing the psychological stress from the infertility treatment process as well as relevant mental illnesses, such as depression or anxiety disorders, which could have a positive impact on increasing pregnancy success rates.
Digital therapies will be able to attain a competitive edge over traditional psychological intervention in the future if technological advances, including the elemental incorporation of artificial intelligence, and more sophisticated personalized approaches are applied.

CONCLUSION

Infertility is a significant psychological burden from the moment of diagnosis, and this emotional distress can lead to a myriad of psychosocial problems for women and men during infertility treatment, potentially leading to comorbidities with mental illnesses such as depression or anxiety disorders and negatively impacting pregnancy. Thus, regular assessment and management of psychological stress in infertile couples are essential during the course of infertility treatment.
Traditional psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies, and other biological treatments can be used effectively to manage emotional distress or depression and anxiety in infertile patients. With the recent breakthroughs in digital technology, digital therapies will be just as competitive as traditional therapies. Psychological intervention of infertile patients should be implemented according to a personalized treatment plan that completely reflects the individual characteristics of the patient, takes into account the effectiveness and safety of each treatment modality, and sufficiently incorporates the clinical context of achieving and maintaining pregnancy.

Notes

Availability of Data and Material

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Yoon Jung Hwang, Namwoo Kim, Tae-Suk Kim. Data Curation: Yoon Jung Hwang, Jihyun Hwang, Hyeonhee Sim. Funding acquisition: Tae-Suk Kim. Investigation: Yoon Jung Hwang, Jihyun Hwang, Hyeonhee Sim. Methodology: Namwoo Kim, Tae-Suk Kim. Project Administration: Junhee Lee, Tae-Suk Kim. Resources: Yoon Jung Hwang, Junhee Lee, Jihyun Hwang, Hyeonhee Sim. Software: Yoon Jung Hwang, Tae-Suk Kim. Supervision: Junhee Lee, Namwoo Kim, Tae-Suk Kim. Validation: Namwoo Kim, Tae-Suk Kim. Visualization: Yoon Jung Hwang, Jihyun Hwang, Hyeonhee Sim. Writing—original draft: Yoon Jung Hwang, Junhee Lee. Writing—review & editing: all authors.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number : HR22C160504).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

None

Figure 1.
Emotional distress of infertility.
pi-2024-0239f1.jpg
Table 1.
Summary of psychiatric intervention studies for infertility
Intervention type Target group Outcome variables Results
Psychotherapy Infertile patients Emotional stress, depression, anxiety Reduces emotional burden, improves psychosocial functions
Cognitive behavioral therapy Infertile patients Negative thoughts, emotional responses Teaches coping mechanisms, reduces stress and negative thoughts
Behavioral activation therapy Infertile patients with depressive symptoms Depressed mood, personal activity Increases engagement in positive activities, improves mood
Group psychotherapy People experiencing infertility Sense of belonging, isolation Reduces isolation, provides empathy and support
Psychopharmacotherapy (SSRIs, SNRIs, mood stabilizers) Infertile patients with psychiatric conditions Depression, anxiety Controls symptoms of depression and anxiety, promotes emotional stability
Biological therapies (ECT, TMS, light therapy) Infertile patients reluctant to pharmacotherapies Depression, anxiety Modulates neurophysiological processes, treats severe depression
Digital therapeutics Infertile patients Stress management, treatment adherence Provides accessible, cost-effective support, reduces psychological stress

SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; SNRIs, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; ECT, electroconvulsive therapy; TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation

REFERENCES

1. Yang SR, Yeo JH. Effects of irrational parenthood cognition, post-traumatic stress disorder and spousal support on quality of life of infertile women. Korean J Women Health Nurs 2017;23:145-153.
crossref pmid pdf
2. Tavousi SA, Behjati M, Milajerdi A, Mohammadi AH. Psychological assessment in infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol 2022;13:961722
crossref pmid pmc
3. Lee HJ, Han JY, Choi HZ, Na BJ. Infertility prevalence and associated factors among women in Seoul, South Korea: a cross-sectional study. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2023;50:54
crossref
4. Kang SH, Kim DG. The role of insurance in the rise of infertility and sterility in an era of low birth rates. KIRI Aging Rev 2018;20:11-14.

5. Götmark F, Andersson M. Human fertility in relation to education, economy, religion, contraception, and family planning programs. BMC Public Health 2020;20:265
pmid pmc
6. Hwang J. Later, fewer, none? Recent trends in cohort fertility in South Korea. Demography 2023;60:563-582.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Kim M, Lee Y, Cho S. [Korean newspapers coverage of infertility, 1962-2013]. Korean J Journalism Commun Stud 2015;58:329-361. Korean.

8. Schmidt L. Psychosocial burden of infertility and assisted reproduction. Lancet 2006;367:379-380.
crossref pmid
9. Kiani Z, Simbar M, Hajain S, Zayeri F. The prevalence of depression symptoms among infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Res Pract 2021;7:6
crossref pmid pmc pdf
10. Domar AD, Zuttermeister PC, Friedman R. The psychological impact of infertility; a comparison with patients with other medical conditions. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 1993;14 suppl:45-52.

11. Merari D, Feldberg D, Elizur A, Goldman J, Modan B. Psychological and hormonal changes in the course of in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:161-169.
crossref pmid pdf
12. Palomba S, Daolio J, Romeo S, Battaglia FA, Marci R, La Sala GB. Lifestyle and fertility: the influence of stress and quality of life on female fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2018;16:113
crossref pmid pmc pdf
13. Khalesi ZB, Kenarsari FJ. Anxiety, depression, and stress: a comparative study between couples with male and female infertility. BMC Womens Health 2024;24:228
crossref pmid pmc pdf
14. Simionescu G, Doroftei B, Maftei R, Obreja BE, Anton E, Grab D, et al. The complex relationship between infertility and psychological distress (Review). Exp Ther Med 2021;21:306
crossref pmid pmc
15. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1506-1512.
crossref pmid
16. Massarotti C, Gentile G, Ferreccio C, Scaruffi P, Remorgida V, Anserini P. Impact of infertility and infertility treatments on quality of life and levels of anxiety and depression in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Gynecol Endocrinol 2019;35:485-489.
crossref pmid
17. Cousineau TM, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007;21:293-308.
crossref pmid
18. Joseph DN, Whirledge S. Stress and the HPA axis: balancing homeostasis and fertility. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:2224
crossref pmid pmc
19. Ramja S, Poomima P, Jananisri A, Geofferina IP, Bavyataa V, Divya M, et al. Role of hormones and the potential impact of multiple stresses on infertility. Stresses 2023;3:454-474.
crossref
20. Sbaragli C, Morgante G, Goracci A, Hofkens T, De Leo V, Castrogiovanni P. Infertility and psychiatric morbidity. Fertil Steril 2008;90:2107-2111.
crossref pmid
21. Zanettoullis AT, Mastorakos G, Vakas P, Vlahos N, Valsamakis G. Effect of stress on each of the stages of the IVF procedure: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci 2024;25:726
crossref pmid pmc
22. Yusuf L. Depression, anxiety, and stress among female patients of infertility; a case control study. Pak J Med Sci 2016;32:1340-1343.
crossref pmid pmc
23. Mohamed HM, Badia TS, Khalaf SA, Abdullah SO, Farghaly TA, Fetih AN, et al. Effect of health education program on knowledge, stress, and satisfaction among infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization injection. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2024;29:1-12.
crossref pdf
24. Kim M, Kim M, Ban M. [Factors influencing the intention for continual fertility treatments by the women undergoing assisted reproductive technology procedures: a cross-sectional study]. J Korean Acad Nurs 2024;54:59-72. Korean.
crossref pmid pdf
25. Lee HS, Boo S, Ahn JA, Song JE. [Effects of uncertainty and spousal support on infertility-related quality of life in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies]. Korean J Women Health Nurs 2020;26:72-83. Korean.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
26. Fisher JR, Hammarberg K. Psychological and social aspects of infertility in men: an overview of the evidence and implications for psychologically informed clinical care and future research. Asian J Androl 2012;14:121-129.
crossref pmid
27. Hjelmstedt A, Andersson L, Skoog-Svanberg A, Bergh T, Boivin J, Collins A. Gender differences in psychological reactions to infertility among couples seeking IVF- and ICSI-treatment. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:42-48.
crossref pmid pdf
28. Greil AL, Slauson-Blevins K, McQuillan J. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Illn 2010;32:140-162.
crossref pmid
29. Wischmann T, Thorn P. (Male) infertility: what does it mean to men? New evidence from quantitative and qualitative studies. Reprod Biomed Online 2013;27:236-243.
crossref pmid
30. Hanna E, Gough B. Experiencing male infertility: a review of the qualitative research literature. SAGE Open 2015;5:1-9.

31. Mikkelsen AT, Madsen SA, Humaidan P. Psychological aspects of male fertility treatment. J Adv Nurs 2013;69:1977-1986.
crossref pmid pdf
32. Malik SH, Coulson NS. Coming to terms with permanent involuntary childlessness: a phenomenological analysis of bulletin board postings. Eur J Psychol 2013;9:77-92.
crossref
33. Evans J. ‘They are called Imperfect men’: male infertility and sexual health in early modern England. Soc Hist Med 2016;29:311-332.
crossref pmid
34. Yazdani F, Elyasi F, Peyvandi S, Moosazadeh M, Galekolaee KS, Kalantari F, et al. Counseling-supportive interventions to decrease infertile women’s perceived stress: a systematic review. Electron Physician 2017;9:4694-4702.
crossref pmid pmc
35. Faramarzi M, Pasha H, Esmailzadeh S, Kheirkhah F, Heidary S, Afshar Z. The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy on infertility stress: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Fertil Steril 2013;7:199-206.
pmid pmc
36. Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cogn Ther Res 2012;36:427-440.
crossref pdf
37. Boorboor N, Haddadian Nekah M, Hamidi B, Uosefi M, Eskandarian F, Mousavi S. Online behavioral activation therapy on depression and alexithymia in infertile women during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Arch Hyg Sci 2022;11:210-215.

38. Kalhori F, Masoumi SZ, Shamsaei F, Mohammadi Y, Yavangi M. Effect of mindfulness-based group counseling on depression in infertile women: randomized clinical trial study. Int J Fertil Steril 2020;14:10-16.
pmid pmc
39. Leon IG. Understanding and treating infertility: psychoanalytic considerations. J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry 2010;38:47-75.
crossref pmid
40. Bleichmar HB. Some subtypes of depression and their implications for psychoanalytic treatment. Int J Psychoanal 1996;77(Pt 5):935-961.
pmid
41. Domar AD, Clapp D, Slawsby E, Kessel B, Orav J, Freizinger M. The impact of group psychological interventions on distress in infertile women. Health Psychol 2000;19:568-575.
crossref pmid
42. Crits-Christoph P, Rieger A, Gaines A, Gibbons MBC. Trust and respect in the patient-clinician relationship: preliminary development of a new scale. BMC Psychol 2019;7:91
crossref pmid pmc pdf
43. Yohn CN, Gergues MM, Samuels BA. The role of 5-HT receptors in depression. Mol Brain 2017;10:28
crossref pmid pmc pdf
44. Gosmann NP, Costa MA, Jaeger MdB, Motta LS, Frozi J, Spanemberg L, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and stress disorders: a 3-level network meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2021;18:e1003664.
crossref pmid pmc
45. Pasha H, Basirat Z, Faramarzi M, Kheirkhah F. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies for improvement of statetrait anxiety: a randomized controlled trial among Iranian infertile women with sexual dysfunctions. Crescent J Med Biol Sci 2017;4:47-53.

46. Jakobsen JC, Katakam KK, Schou A, Hellmuth SG, Stallknecht SE, Leth-Møller K, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2017;17:58
crossref pmid pmc pdf
47. Edinoff AN, Akuly HA, Hanna TA, Ochoa CO, Patti SJ, Ghaffar YA, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse effects: a narrative review. Neurol Int 2021;13:387-401.
crossref pmid pmc
48. Koochaksaraei FY, Simbar M, Khoshnoodifar M, Faramarzi M, Nasiri M. Interventions promoting mental health dimensions in infertile women: a systematic review. BMC Psychol 2023;11:254
crossref pmid pmc pdf
49. Tsuchiyama K, Nagayama H, Yamada K, Isogawa K, Katsuragi S, Kiyota A. Predicting efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2005;59:546-550.
crossref pmid
50. Su L, Zhang Y, Jia Y, Sun J, Mellor D, Yuan TF, et al. Predictors of electroconvulsive therapy outcome in major depressive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2023;26:53-60.
crossref pmid pdf
51. Voigt J, Carpenter L, Leuchter A. A systematic literature review of the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in non-treatment resistant patients with major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2019;19:13
crossref pmid pmc pdf
52. Cole EJ, Stimpson KH, Bentzley BS, Gulser M, Cherian K, Tischler C, et al. Stanford accelerated intelligent neuromodulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression. Am J Psychiatry 2020;177:716-726.
crossref pmid
53. Crowley SK, Youngstedt SD. Efficacy of light therapy for perinatal depression: a review. J Physiol Anthropol 2012;31:15
crossref pmid pmc pdf
54. Donmez M, Yorguner N, Kora K, Topcuoglu V. Efficacy of bright light therapy in perinatal depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Psychiatr Res 2022;149:315-322.
crossref pmid
55. Yoo JH, Jeong H, Chung TM. Cutting-edge technologies for digital therapeutics: a review and architecture proposals for future directions. Appl Sci 2023;13:6929
crossref
56. Bjornsdottir RR, Helgadottir FD, Sighvatsson MB. Evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for fertility stress in women: a feasibility study. Behav Cogn Psychother 2023;51:180-185.
crossref pmid
57. Berardi C, Antonini M, Jordan Z, Wechtler H, Paolucci F, Hinwood M. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2024;24:243
crossref pmid pmc pdf
58. Magal T, Negev M, Kaphzan H. Attitudinal barriers hindering adoption of telepsychiatry among mental healthcare professionals: Israel as a case-study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:12540
crossref pmid pmc
59. Anastasiadou D, Folkvord F, Serrano-Troncoso E, Lupiañez-Villanueva F. Mobile health adoption in mental health: user experience of a mobile health app for patients with an eating disorder. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7:e12920
crossref pmid pmc
60. Orlowski S, Lawn S, Matthews B, Venning A, Wyld K, Jones G, et al. The promise and the reality: a mental health workforce perspective on technology-enhanced youth mental health service delivery. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:562
crossref pmid pmc pdf
61. Clifton J, Parent J, Seehaus M, Worrall G, Forehand R, Domar A. An internet-based mind/body intervention to mitigate distress in women experiencing infertility: a randomized pilot trial. PLoS One 2020;15:e0229379.
crossref pmid pmc


ABOUT
AUTHOR INFORMATION
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
Editorial Office
#522, 27, Seochojungang-ro 24-gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06601, Korea
Tel: +82-2-717-0892    E-mail: psychiatryinvest@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Neuropsychiatric Association.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next