3. Alam SS, Hashim NMHN, Ahmad M, Wel CAC, Nor SM, Omar NA. Negative and positive impact of internet addiction on young adults: empericial study in Malaysia. Intang Cap 2014;10:619-638.
4. Castells M. Technopoles of the world: the making of 21st century industrial complexes. London: Routledge; 2014.
6. Gaffney H, Farrington DP, Espelage DL, Ttofi MM. Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggress Violent Behav 2019;45:134-153.
7. Kowalski RM, Limber SP, McCord A. A developmental approach to cyberbullying: prevalence and protective factors. Aggress Violent Behav 2019;45:20-32.
8. Chun J, Lee J, Kim J, Lee S. An international systematic review of cyberbullying measurements. Comput Human Behav 2020;113:106485
9. Lee DN, Ryu JY. [Tackling school-related online violence in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic: legislative issues and challenges]. J Law Educ 2021;33:161-185. Korean.
10. Olweus D. A profile of bullying at school. Educ Leadersh 2003;60:12-17.
11. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behav 2008;29:129-156.
12. Kowalski RM, Limber SP, Agatston PW. Cyberbullying: bullying in the digital age (2nd ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
13. Slonje R, Smith PK, Fris?n A. The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Comput Human Behav 2013;29:26-32.
14. Smith PK. Cyberbullying and cyber aggression (2nd ed). In: Jimerson S, Nickerson A, Mayer MJ, Furlong MJ, editors. Handbook of school violence and school safety: international research and practice. New York: Routledge, 2012, p.93-103.
15. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Bullying beyond the schoolyard: preventing and responding to cyberbullying (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press; 2014.
16. Lee SS, Jun SH. [An study on the causes of university students’ cyber bullying: three smart phone uses of texting, SNS, and internet]. Korean Crim Rev 2015;26:187-207. Korean.
18. Choi JH, Kim DY. [The moderating effect of parent-child communication and self-control on the relationship between cyberbullying damage experience and suicidal ideation in female adolescents]. Korean J Appl Dev Psychol 2019;8:55-67. Korean.
19. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Cyberbullying: a review of the legal issues facing educators. Prev Sch Fail 2011;55:71-78.
21. Balakrishnan V. Cyberbullying among young adults in Malaysia: the roles of gender, age and internet frequency. Comput Hum Behav 2015;46:149-157.
22. Jun D, Kim D. [A study on adult’s cyberviolence]. Korean J Local Gov Adm Stud 2016;30:25-43. Korean.
23. Camerini AL, Marciano L, Carrara A, Schulz PJ. Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Telemat Inform 2020;49:101362
24. Kanwal H, Jami H. Exploring modes, strategies, and psychosocial consequences of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among university students. Pak J Psychol Res 2019;34:787-817.
25. Martínez-Monteagudo MC, Delgado B, Díaz-Herrero Á, García-Fernández JM. Relationship between suicidal thinking, anxiety, depression and stress in university students who are victims of cyberbullying. Psychiatry Res 2020;286:112856
26. Oksanen A, Oksa R, Savela N, Kaakinen M, Ellonen N. Cyberbullying victimization at work: social media identity bubble approach. Comput Hum Behav 2020;109:106363
27. Ak Ş, Özdemir Y, Kuzucu Y. Cybervictimization and cyberbullying: the mediating role of anger, don’t anger me! Comput Hum Behav 2015;49:437-443.
28. Kim BS. [A study on the factors that influence adult cyberbullying-focusing on the mediation effect on the attitude to cyberbullying]. Inf Policy 2021;28:57-80. Korean.
30. Marsh HW, Wen Z, Hau KT. Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychol Methods 2004;9:275-300.
32. Fanti KA, Demetriou AG, Hawa VV. A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: examining riskand protective factors. Eur J Dev Psychol 2012;9:168-181.
34. Walrave M, Heirman W. Cyberbullying: predicting victimisation and perpetration. Child Soc 2011;25:59-72.
35. Choi J. [Influence of cyber bullying victimization on cyber bullying: mediating effects of anxiety and moderation effects of stress coping strategy]. Crisisonomy 2015;11:195-214. Korean.
37. Oh S, Shin J. [The effect of cyber violence victimization on perpetration of children in the upper elementary grades: the mediating effect of self-control, and the moderating effect of child-parent attachment]. Forum Youth 2021;68:5-31. Korean.
38. Agnew R, White HR. An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminol 1992;30:475-500.
39. Kim K, Yoon H. [Associations between adolescents’ victimization of violence, tolerance toward violence, and cyber violence offending behavior]. J Korean Soc Child Welf 2012;39:213-244. Korean.
40. Leung ANM, Wong N, Farver JM. Cyberbullying in Hong Kong Chinese students: life satisfaction, and the moderating role of friendship qualities on cyberbullying victimization and perpetration. Pers Individ Differ 2018;133:7-12.
41. Cohen-Almagor R. Social responsibility on the internet: addressing the challenge of cyberbullying. Aggress Violent Behav 2018;39:42-52.
42. Leonard LN, Cronan TP, Kreie J. What influences IT ethical behavior intentions—planned behavior, reasoned action, perceived importance, or individual characteristics? Inf Manag 2004;42:143-158.
43. Peace AG, Galletta DF, Thong JY. Software piracy in the workplace: a model and empirical test. J Manag Inf Syst 2003;20:153-177.
44. Chu BW. [Online moral disengagement and the tasks of internet ethics education]. J Ethics 2012;1:119-141. Korean.
45. Agnew R. Social control theory and delinquency: a longitudinal test. Criminol 1985;23:47-61.
46. Rhee K, Kim MJ. [Are real ethics and internet ethics truly different?]. Commun KIISE 2012;30:9-14. Korean.
47. Kim KH, Cha EJ. [The influence of internet addiction on cyber delinquency among middle school students: testing the mediating effect of internet ethics]. Health Soc Welf Rev 2012;32:364-401. Korean.
48. Choo BW. [The formulation plan of cyber ethics]. Korea J Inf Soc 2001;3:164-190. Korean.
49. Bae SM. The relationship between exposure to risky online content, cyber victimization, perception of cyberbullying, and cyberbullying offending in Korean adolescents. Child Youth Serv Rev 2021;123:105946
50. Kim SH, Lee CB, Kim SS, Kim TH, Jeong IS, Jo SJ. [The effects of the sense of cyber ethics on cyber bullying among adolescents: focusing on the moderating effects of parental control]. J Korean Public Police Security Stud 2022;19:17-34. Korean.
51. Molluzzo JC, Lawler J. A study of the perceptions of college students on cyberbullying. Inf Syst Educ J 2012;10:84-109.
52. Kim MK, Park JH. [Factors influencing the level of internet ethics and its relationship with internet violence among adults]. J Consum Policy Stud 2008;33:65-91. Korean.
53. Lee SS. [Testing the interaction effect between causal and countermeasure factors across three types of cybercrime]. J Korean Public Police Secur Stud 2018;15:209-234. Korean.
54. Bae SM. The moderating effect of the perception of cyber violence on the influence of exposure to violent online media on cyber offending in Korean adolescents. Sch Psychol Int 2021;42:450-461.
55. Jang HY, Lee SS. [An integrated test of interaction effect between causes and internet ethics of smart phone cyber bullying]. Inf Policy 2019;26:46-61. Korean.
56. De Pasquale C, Martinelli V, Sciacca F, Mazzone M, Chiappedi M, Dinaro C, et al. The role of mood states in cyberbullying and cybervictimization behaviors in adolescents. Psychiatry Res 2021;300:113908
57. Ortega-Barón J, Buelga S, Cava MJ, Torralba E. [School violence and attitude toward authority of students perpetrators of cyberbullying]. Rev Psicodida?ct 2017;22:23-28. Spanish.
58. Wong DS, Chan HCO, Cheng CH. Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among adolescents in Hong Kong. Child Youth Serv Rev 2014;36:133-140.
59. Ševčíková A, Šmahel D. Online harassment and cyberbullying in the Czech Republic: comparison across age groups. J Psychol 2009;217:227-229.
60. Young K, Govender C. A comparison of gender, age, grade, and experiences of authoritarian parenting amongst traditional and cyberbullying perpetrators. S Afr J Educ 2018;38(Supplement 1):S1-S11.
61. Lampridis E. Stereotypical beliefs about cyber bullying: an exploratory study in terms of myths. Univers J Educ Res 2015;3:135-147.
62. Musharraf S, Bauman S, Anis-Ul-Haque M, Malik JA. General and ICT self-efficacy in different participants roles in cyberbullying/victimization among Pakistani university students. Front Psychol 2019;10:1098
63. Kim KM, Kim SS. [Development and validation of the information and communication ethics index of adolescents]. J Curric Eval 2014;17:191-221. Korean.
64. Doane AN, Kelley ML, Chiang ES, Padilla MA. Development of the cyberbullying experiences survey. Emerg Adulthood 2013;1:207-218.
65. Kim SK. [Validation of the Korean version cyberbullying experiences survey (K-CES)] [dissertation]. Daegu: Kyungpook National University; 2021. Korean.
66. Cho KI. [The research for the leveles and moral of teenagers in cyber space lncluding the development of evalutation methods for them]. Proc Korean Soc Comput Inf Conf 2013;17:151-156. Korean.
67. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed). New York: Guilford Press; 2015.
68. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis (7th ed). New York: Prentice Hall; 2010.
69. Merenda PF. A guide to the proper use of factor analysis in the conduct and reporting of research: pitfalls to avoid. Meas Eval Counsel Dev 1997;30:156-164.
70. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach (2nd ed). New York: Guilford Press; 2017.
71. Frazier PA, Tix AP, Barron KE. Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol 2004;51:115-134.
72. Buelga S, Iranzo B, Cava MJ, Torralba E. Psychological profile of adolescent cyberbullying aggressors. Int J Soc Psychol 2015;30:382-406.
73. Erdur-Baker Ö. Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media Soc 2010;12:109-125.
74. Li Q. Cyberbullying in schools: a research of gender differences. Sch Psychol Int 2006;27:157-170.
77. Yoo SM, Kim JM, Kim CG. [The effects of psychological characteristics of adolescents on cyberbullying perpetration: focusing on the mediatig effect of cyberbullying victimization]. J Emot Behav Disord 2017;33:63-82. Korean.
78. Choi Y, Kim HS. [The mediating effects of displaced aggression in the relationship between child abuse experiences and cyberbullying tendencies in early adolescents]. Fam Fam Ther 2018;26:321-341. Korean.
79. Kumazaki A, Suzuki K, Katsura R, Sakamoto A, Kashibuchi M. The effects of netiquette and ICT skills on school-bullying and cyber-bullying: the two-wave panel study of Japanese elementary, secondary, and high school students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2011;29:735-741.
80. Sung DK, Kim DH, Lee YS, Lim SW. [A study on the cyber-violence induction factors of teenagers: focused on individual inclination, cyber violence damage experience, and moral consciousness]. J Cybercomm Acad Soc 2006;19:79-129. Korean.
81. Han JH, Chang HS. [The behavioral model of digital music piracy on the web]. J Inf Syst 2007;16:135-158. Korean.
82. Kim W. [Comparison of online flip-learning learning effects on the cultivation of internet ethics awareness for university students]. J Korean Assoc Comput Educ 2021;24:89-96. Korean.
83. Hurlburt G. Toward applied cyberethics. Comput 2018;51:80-84.
84. Lee YH, Kim JD, Park JH. [A study on development of common criteria for evaluation of internet ethics index]. J Internet Comput Serv 2016;17:75-85. Korean.
85. Tokunaga RS. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Hum Behav 2010;26:277-287.