Psychiatry Investig Search

CLOSE


Psychiatry Investig > Volume 22(12); 2025 > Article
Shi and Zhang: Prevalence and Distinct Correlates of Smartphone Addiction, Depressive Symptoms, and Their Comorbidity in College Students

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of comorbid of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms and identify their common and distinct risk factors among college students.

Methods

A total of 8,347 Chinese college students participated in the study by completing questionnaires that assessed individual, family, school, and peer factors, as well as smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to explore the risk of smartphone addiction only, depressive symptoms only, and their comorbidity.

Results

The prevalence rates of smartphone addiction only, depressive symptoms only, and their comorbidity were 30.5%, 8.9%, and 25.3%, respectively. Higher frequency of mobile phone use in lessons and lower level of school belonging were associated with the increased risk of all three disease outcomes. There was a dose-response relationship between the number of risk exposures and the three disease outcomes.

Conclusion

The more risk factors of college students were exposed to, the more likely they were to develop smartphone addiction only, depressive symptoms only, and their comorbidity. Targeted preventive measures and solutions should be implemented to reduce the occurrence of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms.

INTRODUCTION

College students are undergoing a significant transition as they progress from adolescence to adulthood [1], making them more vulnerable to behavioral and psychological health problems due to their immaturity and lower self-regulatory skills [2]. Depressive symptom is one of the most prevalent psychiatric illnesses in this population. The pooled prevalence of generalized depressive symptoms among college students was reported to be 33.6% [3]. Concurrently, smartphone addiction is currently recognized as a public health problem, especially among college students [4]. It is defined by the excessive use of smartphones and an inability to regulate that use [5]. As a subtype of internet addiction [6], it exhibits neurobiological features akin to other addictive behaviors [7], including preoccupation, loss of control, tolerance, withdrawal, and relapse [8]. Epidemiological studies have highlighted a high prevalence of smartphone addiction among college students, ranging from 12.8% in Spain [4] to 59% in Egypt [9], with a reported prevalence of 52.8% in China [10].
Given the high prevalence of depressive symptoms and smartphone addiction among college students, researchers have increasingly focused on the potential interplay between the two conditions [11,12]. Several studies have documented a positive relationship between depressive symptoms and smartphone addiction [11]. Individuals with depressive symptoms use their smartphones repeatedly to alleviate their mood symptoms, which in turn leads to smartphone addiction [13]. Conversely, depressive symptoms may be a side-effect of smartphone addiction, which can cause neuroplastic changes in the brain and result in mood disorders [14]. Moreover, a bidirectional relationship has also been found that two conditions mutually reinforce each other’s adverse consequences [12]. This bidirectionality is consistent with the broader literature on psychiatric comorbidity, which shows that addictive disorders often co-occur with depressive symptoms [15]. For instance, 25% of individuals with substance use disorder have a comorbid depressive disorder [16]. Based on the bidirectional models of comorbidity, the ongoing and interactive effects of psychiatric disorders account for increased rates of comorbidity [17]. Therefore, we thought that the comorbidity between smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms might exist. However, this comorbidity has not yet been well studied.
While direct research on the comorbidity between smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms is limited, insights can be drawn from studies on internet addiction. Previous studies have observed comorbidity between internet addiction and depressive symptoms, with prevalence rates ranging from 0% to 75% [18]. According to common factor models, such high rates of comorbidity result from shared vulnerabilities to both disorders [17], such as dysfunctions in dopaminergic pathways [19] and transcription factors like brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [15]. In addition, males [20], weekly hours of internet use [21], and negative peer relationships [22] have been identified as predictors of the increased risk of comorbidity between internet addiction and depressive symptoms. Given the conceptual and behavioral overlap features between internet and smartphone use [23], we thought that smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms might share similar biological mechanisms and risk profiles.
Notably, individuals with comorbidity showed more severe psychopathological impairments [24]. It is often associated with poor prognosis, leading to more severe clinical features and a greater medical burden than either condition alone [25]. Understanding the occurrence of this comorbidity and recognizing its associated profiles are critical for the proper prevention and treatment of behavioral addiction and psychological problems [15]. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the prevalence of comorbidity between smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms, as well as the related factors. However, research comparing the correlates of smartphone addiction only, depressive symptoms only, and comorbidity among college students is lacking.
To address these gaps, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of comorbid smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms and to identify the shared and distinct factors of single and comorbid problems among college students. The outcomes of this study will provide a foundation for future research on comorbidity and enhance our understanding of the relationship between smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms. Moreover, the findings will offer valuable insights for developing preventive strategies, thereby facilitating early identification and intervention to improve the mental health outcomes of college students.

METHODS

Procedures

This cross-sectional study was conducted from October to November 2022. We adopted convenience sampling to select four universities in the Chinese provinces of Jilin, Liaoning, Shandong, and Shanxi. Cluster convenience sampling was used to recruit participants from each of these universities. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong University (LL20210102). Participants had signed an electronic informed consent form. The purpose of the research was explained to participants before the survey. This online survey was anonymous. All participants were voluntary, and all data were confidential.

Participants

The valid sample included 8,347 college students (5,203 females and 3,144 males) whose age ranged from 16 to 25 years (M=19.78±1.60). Freshmen accounted for over one-third of the participants (n=3,074, 36.8%). The majority of students came from families with more than one child (n=5,588, 66.9%). Further details are presented in Table 1.

Measures

The self-reported questionnaire was composed of seven sections, encompassing socio-demographic, individual, familial, peer-related, and school-related factors, in addition to standardized scales for smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms. In our study, comorbidity refers to the occurrence of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms at the same time within the same assessment period.

Socio-demographic factors

Ten demographic factors were included as follows: sex, grade, family residence, ethnic groups, one-child family, self-reported family income, father’s educational level, mother’s educational level, father’s occupation, and mother’s occupation. The occupation was classified into four groups: unemployment (no-jobs and stay-at-home), blue-collar jobs (occupations relating to transport and equipment operator; and occupations unique to primary industry, processing, manufacturing, and building industry), service jobs (occupations relating to trades, sales, and service), and white-collar jobs (occupations relating to management, natural and applied sciences, health, social sciences, education, religion, art, culture and recreation; and occupations relating to business, finance, administration).

Individual factors

The question “How often do you use your smartphone in lessons?” is used to measure the frequency of smartphone use in classroom. The question “How much time do you spend using the internet every day?” is used to assess the daily hours of internet usage.

Family factor

Parenting styles were divided into positive and negative. Emotional warmth and understanding can be classified as positive parenting styles. Negative parenting styles include punishment and sternness, excessive interference and protection, preference, rejection, and denial. The question “How is your relationship with your parents?” is used to measure the parent-child relationship.

Peer factors

The question “How is your relationship with your classmates (except roommates)?” is used to identify the classmate relationship of college students. The question “How is your relationship with your roommates?” is used to measure the roommate relationship of participants.

School factors

School belonging was determined by the question: “How is your sense of school belonging?” Courses about internet or media at school were assessed by the question: “Does your school provide courses in Internet or media information?”

Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version

The Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version [26] contains 10 items to assess the level of smartphone addiction among college students. This self-report instrument uses a 6-point Likert-scale from “strongly disagree” (coded 1) to “strongly agree” (coded 6). The total score ranges from 10 to 60. Higher scores represent a high risk of smartphone addiction. The cutoff value differs by sex. In this study, smartphone addiction was defined as 31 points for males and 33 points for females [10]. The Cronbach’s alpha in the current sample was 0.939.

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression

The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression is a 20-item self-report instrument developed by Radloff [27] to assess depressive symptoms. This scale measures the frequency of related depressive symptoms over the past week. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert-scale ranging from 0 to 3, with 3 representing the highest frequency. There are 4 items that require reverse coding. The total scores vary from 0 to 60. This study used 20 as the cut-off value to define clinical depressive symptoms [28]. The Cronbach’s alpha in the current sample was 0.922.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 24.0 (IBM Corp.) was used to analyze data. We calculated number and percentages of smartphone addiction only, depressive symptom only, and their comorbidity based on factors related to different domains (individual, family, school, and peer). We used chi-squared test to assess whether smartphone addiction only, depressive symptom only, and their comorbidity differed significantly in different groups. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the prediction of potential risk factors for smartphone addiction only, depressive symptom only, and their comorbidity to identify potential risk factors, respectively. We used Bonferroni correction to calculate the adjusted p-value for multiple tests. Box-plot was used to illustrate the correlation between risk factors and outcomes.

RESULTS

Characteristics of study sample

The prevalence of smartphone addiction was 30.5%. Of the total sample, 8.9% of the respondents had experienced depressive symptoms during the past week. As for the comorbidity of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms, 25.3% of participants reported these symptoms. In univariate analysis, there were significant differences in disease outcomes related to sex (χ2=11.81, p=0.008), grade (χ2=41.73, p<0.001), family residence (χ2=16.66, p=0.001), ethnic groups (χ2=13.61, p=0.003), one-child family (χ2=49.79, p<0.001), self-reported family income (χ2=92.65, p<0.001), father’s educational level (χ2=21.58, p=0.001), mother’s educational level (χ2=40.62, p<0.001), father’s occupation (χ2=31.99, p<0.001), mother’s occupation (χ2=33.03, p<0.001), frequency of mobile phones use in lessons (χ2=310.89, p<0.001), daily hours of internet usage (χ2=230.42, p<0.001), parenting styles (χ2=282.38, p<0.001), parent-child relationship (χ2=301.04, p<0.001), classmate relationship (χ2=286.92, p<0.001), roommate relationship (χ2=313.22, p<0.001), school belonging (χ2=481.81, p<0.001), and courses related to internet or media at school (χ2=43.40, p<0.001). More details are shown in Table 1.

Multivariable analysis of risk factors

The significant predictors in univariate analysis were entered into the multivariate logistic regression models (Table 2). Participants who were not from one-child family (p<0.001), reported higher frequency of mobile phones use in lessons (p<0.001), more average internet use time every day (p<0.001), received negative parenting style (p<0.05), poor classmate relationship (p<0.05), lower school belonging (p<0.001) were at greater risk of smartphone addiction. Students who reported lower-middle-level family income (p<0.05), higher frequency of mobile phones use in lessons (p<0.05), negative parenting style (p<0.001), poor parent-child relationship (p<0.001), poor roommate relationship (p<0.001), and lower school belonging (p<0.001) were more likely to be diagnosed with depressive symptoms. Males (p<0.01), Chinese Han nationality (p<0.05), participants from families with two or more children (p<0.001), mother with junior college and above diploma (p<0.05), lower-middle-level self-reported family income (p<0.01), frequency of mobile phones use in lessons (p<0.001), internet use time >7 hour every day (p<0.01), negative parenting style (p<0.001), poor parent-child relationship (p<0.001), poor classmate relationship (p<0.001), poor roommate relationship (p<0.001), and lower school belonging (p<0.001) were observed to be the significant risk factors of the comorbidity of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms.
Then, we adopted the Bonferroni correction to calculate the adjusted p-value (0.0167) for multiple tests. Students not from one-child family and higher average internet use time every day were associated with smartphone addiction and comorbid smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms. Poor parent-child relationship, poor roommate relationship, and negative parenting style had significant associations with risk of depressive symptoms and comorbid smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms. Higher frequency of mobile phones use in lessons and lower school belonging were related to higher possibility of smartphone addiction only, depressive symptoms only, and their comorbidity. Males, participants with lower-middle-level self-reported family income, and poor classmate relationship were more likely to have the comorbidity of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms.

Relationships between the risk exposures and disease outcomes

Figure 1 illustrates the association between the number of risk factors and the likelihood of having smartphone addiction alone, depressive symptoms alone, and their comorbidity. The model of associations exhibited a dose-response relationship between the number of risk exposures and the likelihood of three disease outcomes. Specifically, students exposed to none of the factors had the lowest risk of having smartphone addiction alone, depressive symptoms alone, and their comorbidity (risk varied from 8% to 32%). Conversely, students who were exposed to all the factors had the highest probability of suffering from smartphone addiction alone (63%), depressive symptoms alone (65%), and their comorbidity (92%).

DISCUSSION

This study examined the prevalence of smartphone addiction alone, depressive symptoms alone, and their comorbidity among college students, as well as associated factors. The results indicated that the prevalence of smartphone addiction was 30.5%, while the comorbidity was 25.3%, exceeding the 8.9% with depressive symptoms alone among college students. Four, five, and ten risk factors were associated with smartphone addiction only, depressive symptoms only, and their comorbidity, respectively. Higher frequency of mobile phone use in lessons and lower level of school belonging were the common predictors of all three disease outcomes. Generally, exposure to more risk factors increased the likelihood of these outcomes, with a 92% probability of comorbidity among medical students exposed to all ten risk factors.
Compared with other studies, our study found that college students had a slightly higher prevalence of smartphone addiction alone (30.5%) but a lower rate of depressive symptoms alone (8.9%). A systematic review showed that the prevalence of smartphone addiction in young people was 23.3% [29]. This highlights potential public health concerns linked to smartphone use among college students [30]. Furthermore, the prevalence of depressive symptoms only in our study sample was lower than that in previous studies, such as in Nigeria (9%) [31], Iran (37%) [32], and Africa (40.1%) [3]. The discrepancies in the figures can be attributed to the use of different measurement methods and sample sizes. Notably, compared to the study on the comorbidity of internet addiction and mood symptoms (13.6%) [33], college students have slightly higher rate of the comorbidity of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms (25.3%). One study found that the prevalence of the comorbid depressive symptoms among individuals with addictive behaviors was 2.59 times higher than among individuals without addictive behaviors [25]. The high comorbidity rate indicates a growing mental health crisis among college students. Depressive symptoms with comorbid addictive behavior may lead to greater academic impairment, reduced quality of life, and huge psychiatric burden [25]. Addressing smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms in isolation may overlook their interaction. Therefore, it is crucial to recognize and address this comorbidity in order to prevent severe clinical outcomes in college students.
Our findings revealed that smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms share overlapping pathogenic factors. After correction for multiple tests, males had a higher risk of comorbid smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms, which is consistent with previous studies on internet addiction and depressive symptoms [34,35]. Compared to females, males tend to spend more time on online gaming by using smartphones, adopt social interaction avoidance strategies [36], and are more prone to addiction. However, some studies have reported the opposite conclusion [37,38]. Meanwhile, other studies have found no sex difference in the comorbidity of addictive behaviors and depressive symptoms [30,39]. Thus, these inconsistent findings need to be further explored to determine how sex affects this comorbidity.
Notably, our study demonstrated that students from families with more than one child were a significant predictor of suffering from both smartphone addiction only and comorbidity. This support prior research indicating that students with siblings are more susceptible to addictive behaviors [40] and depressive symptoms [2]. Moreover, lower-middle-level family income is a high risk of depressive symptoms only and comorbidity. Previous findings have indicated that high-income levels are significantly associated with a lower risk of depressive symptoms [41,42]. Besides, individuals from families with lower-middle-level income are more susceptible to smartphone addiction [43]. One possible reason for this is that students from low-income families see smartphones as a way to escape from the psychological burden of their daily life [43]. However, this finding is inconsistent with other studies that students from higher income families spend more time on their smartphones [44].
This study identified a link between excessive internet daily use (>7 hour) and smartphone addiction, consistent with previous research [45]. Poor self-control and self-regulation in smartphone use can foster problematic habits [46]. Excessive internet daily use was also a contributing factor to the comorbid smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms, potentially explained by the compensatory internet use theory [13]. Individuals may use smartphones excessively to cope with negative emotional situations and to fulfill psychological needs that may not be met in the real world [13]. In addition, the frequency of mobile phone use in lessons was correlated with all three outcomes. College students with smartphone addiction tend to use their phones frequently in class [47]. As highlighted in an integrative review, excessive smartphone use in lessons distracts students from their focus, impairs their academic performance, and may increase their vulnerability to depression [48].
Consistent with previous studies, poor parent-child relationships were related to elevated depressive symptoms among college students [49,50] and to the co-occurrence of depressive symptoms and smartphone addiction. Emotional warmth is a fundamental aspect of a good parent-child relationship [51]. Those with strained parent-child relationships often exhibit poorer emotion regulation skills and perceive less emotional support, making them more vulnerable to depressive symptoms [49]. Furthermore, negative parenting styles were associated with depressive symptoms only. Individuals who experienced less parental warmth and more parental rejection were at an increased risk of depression [52]. In line with the study on the comorbidity on internet addiction and depressive symptoms [53], negative parenting styles were also the risk factors for the overlap of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms. Satisfying basic psychological needs is crucial for adolescent development [54]; however, negative parenting styles, such as parental rejection, can undermine these needs [55]. Lacking family support and facing emotional rejection, students are more prone to psychological issues and may turn to excessive smartphone use to compensate for these unmet needs, which can lead to addictive behavior.
In addition, we also found that poor roommate relationships were associated with depressive symptoms. Both poor classmate relationship and poor roommate relationship were linked with the risk of comorbid smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms. College students are heavily influenced by their peers in school [56]. Students with poor peer relationships may experience less social support and greater isolation, leading to diminished social connectedness [57]. Lower social connectedness has been found to be correlated with mental health problems [58] and higher health-risk behaviors. Notably, school belonging was a significant predictor of all three outcomes. In line with prior research, college students with a strong school belonging were less likely to develop smartphone addiction [59]. A sense of belonging influences individuals’ cognition, emotions, and behaviors [60]. When the sense of belonging cannot satisfy students’ needs in school, a series of negative outcomes could occur, such as depressive symptoms and addictive behaviors.

Strengths and limitations

Depressive symptoms often co-occur with addictive behaviors, but the comorbidity of smartphone addiction has not been well studied. There is little evidence on the shared and unique factors underlying this overlap. Thus, the value of our study lies in comparing the prevalence and risk factors of smartphone addiction alone, depressive symptoms alone, and their comorbidity in a large sample of college students. The dose-response relationship between the number of risk exposures and the likelihood of all three disease outcomes was also determined. These findings enrich the field of psychiatric comorbidity and offer practical implications for the early screening and targeted intervention of high-risk student populations.
There are some limitations to be noted. Firstly, although this study had a large sample size, the generalizability may be influenced by the convenience sampling to select our targeted universities. Multi-stage cluster sampling should be considered in future studies to include students from a variety of universities. Secondly, the cause-and-effect relationship between risk factors and disease outcomes cannot be assessed due to the cross-sectional design. Longitudinal studies should be carried out in the future to confirm this association. Thirdly, this study did not include certain variables related to smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms, such as university and majors, personality traits, and history of mental health problems, and so on. Future research should consider other potential variables to provide deeper insights into the contributing factors of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms. Finally, smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms were measured by self-reported questionnaires rather than clinical diagnoses. Thus, recall bias could not be ruled out.
In conclusion, our study revealed a high prevalence of the comorbidity of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms among college students. There are common and unique factors associated with smartphone addiction alone, depressive symptoms alone, and their comorbidity. Increased exposure to risk factors heightened the likelihood of developing smartphone addiction only, depressive symptoms only, and their comorbidity. High priority should be given to identifying the factors that are closely related to the pathogenesis of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms among college students. Targeted preventive measures and solutions should be implemented. We should fully consider internal and external protective factors for college students to reduce the occurrence of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms.

Notes

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Yan Shi, Xiwu Zhang. Data curation: Yan Shi. Formal analysis: Yan Shi. Funding acquisition: Xiwu Zhang. Investigation: Yan Shi. Methodology: Yan Shi, Xiwu Zhang. Supervision: Xiwu Zhang. Writing— original draft: Yan Shi. Writing—review & editing: Xiwu Zhang.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2022QB030).

Acknowledgments

None

Figure 1.
Relationships between the number of study risk factors and the likelihood of having smartphone addiction only, depressive symptoms only, and their comorbidity. A: Association between risk factors and smartphone addiction. B: Association between risk factors and depressive symptoms. C: Association between risk factors and comorbidity.
pi-2025-0026f1.jpg
Table 1.
Sample characteristics by smartphone addiction only, depressive symptoms only, and their comorbidity (N, %)
Characteristic Total sample (N=8,347) Healthy control (N=2,948) Smartphone addiction (N=2,543) Depressive symptoms (N=745) Comorbidity (N=2,111) Statistics
χ2 p
Sex 11.81 0.008
 Male 3,144 (37.7) 1,147 (38.9) 888 (34.9) 292 (39.2) 817 (38.7)
 Female 5,203 (62.3) 1,801 (61.1) 1,655 (65.1) 453 (60.8) 1,294 (61.3)
Grade 41.73 <0.001
 Freshman year 3,074 (36.8) 1,083 (36.7) 1,020 (40.1) 265 (35.6) 706 (33.4)
 Sophomore year 2,055 (24.6) 697 (23.6) 631 (24.8) 201 (27.0) 526 (24.9)
 Junior year 2,061 (24.7) 789 (26.8) 547 (21.5) 176 (23.6) 549 (26.0)
 Senior year 1,157 (13.9) 379 (12.9) 345 (13.6) 103 (13.8) 330 (15.6)
Family residence 16.66 0.001
 Urban 4,167 (49.9) 1,535 (52.1) 1,256 (49.4) 391 (52.5) 985 (46.7)
 Rural 4,180 (50.1) 1,413 (47.9) 1,287 (50.6) 354 (47.5) 1,126 (53.3)
Ethnic groups 13.61 0.003
 Chinese Han nationality 7,565 (90.6) 2,647 (89.8) 2,304 (90.6) 662 (88.9) 1,952 (92.5)
 Chinese ethnic minority 782 (9.4) 301 (10.2) 239 (9.4) 83 (11.1) 159 (7.5)
One-child family 49.79 <0.001
 Yes 2,759 (33.1) 1,112 (37.7) 770 (30.3) 253 (34.0) 624 (29.6)
 No 5,588 (66.9) 1,836 (62.3) 1,773 (69.7) 492 (66.0) 1,487 (70.4)
Self-reported family income 92.65 <0.001
 Lower-middle-level 4,324 (51.8) 1,390 (47.2) 1,258 (49.5) 422 (56.6) 1,254 (59.4)
 Middle level 3,646 (43.7) 1,398 (47.4) 1,158 (45.5) 297 (39.9) 793 (37.6)
 Middle-higher-level 377 (4.5) 160 (5.4) 127 (5.0) 26 (3.5) 64 (3.0)
Father’s educational level 21.58 0.001
 Junior middle school and below 5,152 (61.7) 1,756 (59.6) 1,589 (62.5) 449 (60.3) 1,358 (64.3)
 Technical secondary school or high school 1,842 (22.1) 651 (22.1) 561 (22.1) 171 (23.0) 459 (21.7)
 Junior college and above 1,353 (16.2) 541 (18.4) 393 (15.5) 125 (16.8) 294 (13.9)
Mother’s educational level 40.62 <0.001
 Junior middle school and below 5,557 (66.6) 1,864 (63.2) 1,732 (68.1) 478 (64.2) 1,483 (70.3)
 Technical secondary school or high school 1,637 (19.6) 616 (20.9) 471 (18.5) 150 (20.1) 400 (18.9)
 Junior college and above 1,153 (13.8) 468 (15.9) 340 (13.4) 117 (15.7) 228 (10.8)
Father’s occupation 31.99 <0.001
 Unemployment 524 (6.3) 173 (5.9) 136 (5.3) 62 (8.3) 153 (7.2)
 Blue-collar jobs 5,398 (64.7) 1,849 (62.7) 1,661 (65.3) 477 (64.0) 1,411 (66.8)
 Service jobs 1,080 (12.9) 402 (13.6) 331 (13.0) 87 (11.7) 260 (12.3)
 White-collar jobs 1,345 (16.1) 524 (17.8) 415 (16.3) 119 (16.0) 287 (13.6)
Mother’s occupation 33.03 <0.001
 Unemployment 1,932 (23.1) 656 (22.3) 567 (22.3) 163 (21.9) 546 (25.9)
 Blue-collar jobs 4,304 (51.6) 1,471 (49.9) 1,326 (52.1) 391 (52.5) 1,116 (52.9)
 Service jobs 984 (11.8) 385 (13.1) 305 (12.0) 88 (11.8) 206 (9.8)
 White-collar jobs 1,127 (13.5) 436 (14.8) 345 (13.6) 103 (13.8) 243 (11.5)
Frequency of mobile phone use in lessons 310.89 <0.001
 Rarely 4,586 (54.9) 1,948 (66.1) 1,295 (50.9) 413 (55.4) 930 (44.1)
 Sometimes 2,438 (29.2) 721 (24.5) 816 (32.1) 213 (28.6) 688 (32.6)
 Often 1,323 (15.9) 279 (9.5) 432 (17.0) 119 (16.0) 493 (23.4)
Daily hours of internet usage 230.42 <0.001
 <5 1,965 (23.6) 889 (30.2) 492 (19.4) 203 (27.3) 381 (18.1)
 5-7 3,700 (44.4) 1,351 (45.9) 1,163 (45.8) 318 (42.7) 868 (41.1)
 >7 2,672 (32.0) 706 (24.0) 882 (34.8) 223 (30.0) 861 (40.8)
Parenting styles 282.38 <0.001
 Positive 6,524 (78.2) 2,519 (85.4) 2,066 (81.2) 509 (68.3) 1,430 (67.7)
 Negative 1,823 (21.8) 429 (14.6) 477 (18.8) 236 (31.7) 681 (32.3)
Parent-child relationship 301.04 <0.001
 Poor 1,867 (22.4) 447 (15.2) 474 (18.6) 232 (31.1) 714 (33.8)
 Good 6,480 (77.6) 2,501 (84.8) 2,069 (81.4) 513 (68.9) 1,397 (66.2)
Classmate relationship 286.92 <0.001
 Poor 2,913 (34.9) 767 (26.0) 815 (32.0) 327 (43.9) 1,004 (47.6)
 Good 5,434 (65.1) 2,181 (74.0) 1,728 (68.0) 418 (56.1) 1,107 (52.4)
Roommate relationship 313.22 <0.001
 Poor 1,238 (14.8) 270 (9.2) 273 (10.7) 178 (23.9) 517 (24.5)
 Good 7,109 (85.2) 2,678 (90.8) 2,270 (89.3) 567 (76.1) 1,594 (75.5)
School belonging 481.81 <0.001
 Low 699 (8.4) 136 (4.6) 149 (5.9) 115 (15.4) 299 (14.2)
 Moderate 4,044 (48.4) 1,202 (40.8) 1,244 (48.9) 409 (54.9) 1,189 (56.3)
 High 3,604 (43.2) 1,610 (54.6) 1,150 (45.2) 221 (29.7) 623 (29.5)
Courses related to internet or media at school 43.40 <0.001
 Yes 6,415 (76.9) 2,376 (80.6) 1,937 (76.2) 564 (75.7) 1,538 (72.9)
 No 1,932 (23.1) 572 (19.4) 606 (23.8) 181 (24.3) 573 (27.1)
Table 2.
Multivariate logistic regression models for risk of smartphone addiction only, depressive symptoms only, and their comorbidity
Risk exposure Smartphone addiction Depressive symptoms Comorbidity
Sex
 Female - - ref.
 Male - - 1.26 (1.10-1.44)**
Ethnic groups
 Chinese ethnic minority - - ref.
 Chinese Han nationality - - 1.26 (1.01-1.57)*
One-child family
 Yes ref. - ref.
 No 1.34 (1.20-1.51)*** - 1.33 (1.16-1.52)***
Mother’s educational level
 Junior middle school and below - - ref.
 Technical secondary school or high school - - 1.17 (0.94-1.47)
 Junior college and above - - 1.26 (1.02-1.54)*
Self-reported family income
 Middle-higher-level - ref. ref.
 Middle level - 1.31 (0.83-2.05) 1.34 (0.95-1.88)
 Lower-middle-level - 1.70 (1.08-2.65)* 1.76 (1.24-2.48)**
Frequency of mobile phone use in lessons
 Rarely ref. ref. ref.
 Sometimes 1.55 (1.37-1.76)*** 1.29 (1.06-1.56)* 1.75 (1.52-2.02)***
 Often 1.95 (1.64-2.31)*** 1.70 (1.32-2.19)*** 2.54 (2.12-3.06)***
Daily hours of internet usage
 <5 ref. - ref.
 5-7 1.44 (1.25-1.65)*** - 1.32 (1.12-1.55)**
 >7 1.86 (1.60-2.17)*** - 1.99 (1.67-2.37)***
Parenting styles
 Positive ref. ref. ref.
 Negative 1.21 (1.05-1.41)* 1.85 (1.51-2.27)*** 1.81 (1.55-2.12)***
Parent-child relationship
 Good - ref. ref.
 Poor - 1.53 (1.25-1.89)*** 1.62 (1.38-1.89)***
Classmate relationship
 Good ref. - ref.
 Poor 1.15 (1.02-1.31)* - 1.38 (1.20-1.60)***
Roommate relationship
 Good - ref. ref.
 Poor - 1.82 (1.45-2.29)*** 1.65 (1.37-1.99)***
School belonging
 High ref. ref. ref.
 Moderate 1.23 (0.95-1.59) 1.96 (1.62-2.36)*** 1.76 (1.53-2.02)***
 Low 1.24 (1.10-1.39)*** 3.90 (2.87-5.31)*** 3.28 (2.56-4.21)***

* p<0.05;

** p<0.01;

*** p<0.001.

-, not applicable.

REFERENCES

1. Song Y, Liu Z, Chen H, Guo Q, Huang Y. Incidence and risk factors of depressive symptoms in Chinese college students. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2020;16:2449-2457.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Li Y, Li G, Liu L, Wu H. Correlations between mobile phone addiction and anxiety, depression, impulsivity, and poor sleep quality among college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Addict 2020;9:551-571.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Li W, Zhao Z, Chen D, Peng Y, Lu Z. Prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety symptoms among college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2022;63:1222-1230.
crossref pmid pdf
4. Okasha T, Saad A, Ibrahim I, Elhabiby M, Khalil S, Morsy M. Prevalence of smartphone addiction and its correlates in a sample of Egyptian university students. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2022;68:1580-1588.
crossref pmid pdf
5. Billieux J. Problematic use of the mobile phone: a literature review and a pathways model. Curr Psychiatry Rev 2012;8:299-307.
crossref
6. Elhai JD, Yang H, Fang J, Bai X, Hall BJ. Depression and anxiety symptoms are related to problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese young adults: fear of missing out as a mediator. Addict Behav 2020;101:105962
crossref pmid
7. Lee D, Namkoong K, Lee J, Lee BO, Jung YC. Lateral orbitofrontal gray matter abnormalities in subjects with problematic smartphone use. J Behav Addict 2019;8:404-411.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Contractor AA, Frankfurt SB, Weiss NH, Elhai JD. Latent-level relations between DSM-5 PTSD symptom clusters and problematic smartphone use. Comput Human Behav 2017;72:170-177.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Lopez-Fernandez O. Short version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale adapted to Spanish and French: towards a cross-cultural research in problematic mobile phone use. Addict Behav 2017;64:275-280.
crossref pmid
10. Nikolic A, Bukurov B, Kocic I, Vukovic M, Ladjevic N, Vrhovac M, et al. Smartphone addiction, sleep quality, depression, anxiety, and stress among medical students. Front Public Health 2023;11:1252371
crossref pmid pmc
11. Alhassan AA, Alqadhib EM, Taha NW, Alahmari RA, Salam M, Almutairi AF. The relationship between addiction to smartphone usage and depression among adults: a cross sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 2018;18:148
crossref pmid pmc pdf
12. Yang X, Guo WJ, Tao YJ, Meng YJ, Wang HY, Li XJ, et al. A bidirectional association between internet addiction and depression: a largesample longitudinal study among Chinese university students. J Affect Disord 2022;299:416-424.
crossref pmid
13. Kardefelt-Winther D. A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: towards a model of compensatory internet use. Comput Human Behav 2014;31:351-354.
crossref
14. Gómez-Coronado N, Sethi R, Bortolasci CC, Arancini L, Berk M, Dodd S. A review of the neurobiological underpinning of comorbid substance use and mood disorders. J Affect Disord 2018;241:388-401.
crossref pmid
15. Calarco CA, Lobo MK. Depression and substance use disorders: clinical comorbidity and shared neurobiology. Int Rev Neurobiol 2021;157:245-309.
crossref pmid
16. Hunt GE, Malhi GS, Lai HMX, Cleary M. Prevalence of comorbid substance use in major depressive disorder in community and clinical settings, 1990-2019: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2020;266:288-304.
crossref pmid
17. Mueser KT, Drake RE, Wallach MA. Dual diagnosis: a review of etiological theories. Addict Behav 1998;23:717-734.
crossref pmid
18. Ostinelli EG, Zangani C, Giordano B, Maestri D, Gambini O, D’Agostino A, et al. Depressive symptoms and depression in individuals with internet gaming disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2021;284:136-142.
crossref pmid
19. Caldiroli A, Serati M, Buoli M. Is internet addiction a clinical symptom or a psychiatric disorder? A comparison with bipolar disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 2018;206:644-656.
crossref pmid
20. Wang Z, Yang H, Elhai JD. Are there gender differences in comorbidity symptoms networks of problematic social media use, anxiety and depression symptoms? Evidence from network analysis. Pers Individ Dif 2022;195:111705
crossref
21. Yen JY, Ko CH, Yen CF, Wu HY, Yang MJ. The comorbid psychiatric symptoms of internet addiction: attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, social phobia, and hostility. J Adolesc Health 2007;41:93-98.
crossref pmid
22. Li X, Luo X, Zheng R, Jin X, Mei L, Xie X, et al. The role of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and school functioning in the association between peer victimization and internet addiction: a moderated mediation model. J Affect Disord 2019;256:125-131.
crossref pmid
23. Jo S, Baek IC, Fava M, Mischoulon D, Hong JP, Kim H, et al. Association of smartphone overuse with depression, anxiety, and other addictive behaviors: a nationwide community sample of Korean adults. Psychiatry Res 2021;304:114133
crossref pmid
24. Na E, Lee H, Choi I, Kim DJ. Comorbidity of internet gaming disorder and alcohol use disorder: a focus on clinical characteristics and gaming patterns. Am J Addict 2017;26:326-334.
crossref pmid pdf
25. Wang HR, Cho H, Kim DJ. Prevalence and correlates of comorbid depression in a nonclinical online sample with DSM-5 internet gaming disorder. J Affect Disord 2018;226:1-5.
crossref pmid
26. Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One 2013;8:e83558
crossref pmid pmc
27. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1:385-401.

28. Vilagut G, Forero CG, Barbaglia G, Alonso J. Screening for depression in the general population with the center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-D): a systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0155431
crossref pmid pmc
29. Sohn SY, Rees P, Wildridge B, Kalk NJ, Carter B. Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: a systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE of the evidence. BMC Psychiatry 2019;19:356
crossref pmid pmc pdf
30. Chen B, Liu F, Ding S, Ying X, Wang L, Wen Y. Gender differences in factors associated with smartphone addiction: a cross-sectional study among medical college students. BMC Psychiatry 2017;17:341
crossref pmid pmc pdf
31. Adewuya AO, Ologun YA. Factors associated with depressive symptoms in Nigerian adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2006;39:105-110.
crossref pmid
32. Karimi A, Yadegari N, Sarokhani D, Fakhri M, Dehkordi AH. Prevalence of depression in Iranian school students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prev Med 2021;12:110
crossref pmid pmc
33. Gao T, Li M, Hu Y, Qin Z, Cao R, Mei S, et al. When adolescents face both internet addiction and mood symptoms: a cross-sectional study of comorbidity and its predictors. Psychiatry Res 2020;284:112795
crossref pmid
34. Dieris-Hirche J, Bottel L, Bielefeld M, Steinbüchel T, Kehyayan A, Dieris B, et al. Media use and internet addiction in adult depression: a case-control study. Comput Human Behav 2017;68:96-103.
crossref
35. Liang L, Zhou D, Yuan C, Shao A, Bian Y. Gender differences in the relationship between internet addiction and depression: a cross-lagged study in Chinese adolescents. Comput Human Behav 2016;63:463-470.
crossref
36. Li G, Hou G, Yang D, Jian H, Wang W. Relationship between anxiety, depression, sex, obesity, and internet addiction in Chinese adolescents: a short-term longitudinal study. Addict Behav 2019;90:421-427.
crossref pmid
37. Demirci K, Akgönül M, Akpinar A. Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. J Behav Addict 2015;4:85-92.
crossref pmid pmc
38. Håkansson A, Widinghoff C. Gender differences in problem gamblers in an online gambling setting. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2020;13:681-691.
crossref pmid pmc
39. Gerdner A, Håkansson A. Prevalence and comorbidity in a Swedish adolescent community sample - gambling, gaming, substance use, and other psychiatric disorders. BMC Psychiatry 2022;22:594
crossref pmid pmc pdf
40. Yu Q, Zhang L, Wu S, Guo Y, Jin S, Sun Y. The influence of juvenile preference for online social interaction on problematic internet use: the moderating effect of sibling condition and the moderated moderating effect of age cohort. Comput Human Behav 2017;68:345-351.
crossref
41. Tan M, Chen M, Li J, He X, Jiang Z, Tan H, et al. Depressive symptoms and associated factors among left-behind children in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2018;18:1059
crossref pmid pmc pdf
42. Zhou W, Pu J, Zhong X, Yang W, Teng T, Fan L, et al. Overlap of burnout-depression symptoms among Chinese neurology graduate students in a national cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ 2021;21:83
crossref pmid pmc pdf
43. Aljomaa SS, Al Qudah MF, Albursan IS, Bakhiet SF, Abduljabbar AS. Smartphone addiction among university students in the light of some variables. Comput Human Behav 2016;61:155-164.
crossref
44. Long J, Liu TQ, Liao YH, Qi C, He HY, Chen SB, et al. Prevalence and correlates of problematic smartphone use in a large random sample of Chinese undergraduates. BMC Psychiatry 2016;16:408
crossref pmid pmc pdf
45. Zhong Y, Ma H, Liang YF, Liao CJ, Zhang CC, Jiang WJ. Prevalence of smartphone addiction among Asian medical students: a meta-analysis of multinational observational studies. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2022;68:1171-1183.
crossref pmid pdf
46. Huang S, Lai X, Xue Y, Zhang C, Wang Y. A network analysis of problematic smartphone use symptoms in a student sample. J Behav Addict 2020;9:1032-1043.
crossref pmid pmc
47. Roberts JA, Yaya LH, Manolis C. The invisible addiction: cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. J Behav Addict 2014;3:254-265.
crossref pmid pmc
48. Ramjan LM, Salamonson Y, Batt S, Kong A, McGrath B, Richards G, et al. The negative impact of smartphone usage on nursing students: an integrative literature review. Nurse Educ Today 2021;102:104909
crossref pmid
49. Sela Y, Zach M, Amichay-Hamburger Y, Mishali M, Omer H. Family environment and problematic internet use among adolescents: the mediating roles of depression and fear of missing out. Comput Human Behav 2020;106:106226
crossref
50. Yap MB, Pilkington PD, Ryan SM, Jorm AF. Parental factors associated with depression and anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2014;156:8-23.
crossref pmid
51. Zhang C, Jiang Y, Zhu C, Li M, Quan X, Chen F. Parent-child relationship and problematic smartphone use among chinese adolescents: a moderated mediation model. Curr Psychol 2023;42:16518-16532.
crossref pdf
52. Miranda MC, Affuso G, Esposito C, Bacchini D. Parental acceptance-rejection and adolescent maladjustment: mothers’ and fathers’ combined roles. J Child Fam Stud 2016;25:1352-1362.
crossref pdf
53. Karaer Y, Akdemir D. Parenting styles, perceived social support and emotion regulation in adolescents with internet addiction. Compr Psychiatry 2019;92:22-27.
crossref pmid
54. Lee S, Mun IB. How does perceived parental rejection influence cyberbullying by children? A serial mediation model of children’s depression and smartphone addiction. Soc Sci J 2022;62:741-756.
crossref
55. Zhu J, Chen Y. Developmental pathways from parental rejection to adolescent internet gaming disorder: a parallel process latent growth model. Child Youth Ser Rev 2021;128:106128
crossref
56. Feng L, Zhang L. Perceived teacher support, peer relationship, and university students’ mental health: the mediation of reality and internet altruistic behaviors. Front Psychol 2022;13:999524
crossref pmid pmc
57. Sun P, Xing L, Wu J, Kou Y. Receiving feedback after posting status updates on social networking sites predicts lower loneliness: a mediated moderation model. Appl Psychol Health Well Being 2023;15:97-114.
crossref pmid pdf
58. Liu SR, Davis EP, Palma AM, Sandman CA, Glynn LM. The acute and persisting impact of COVID-19 on trajectories of adolescent depression: sex differences and social connectedness. J Affect Disord 2022;299:246-255.
crossref pmid
59. Huang S, Lai X, Li Y, Luo Y, Wang Y. Understanding juveniles’ problematic smartphone use and related influencing factors: a network perspective. J Behav Addict 2021;10:811-826.
crossref pmid pmc
60. Zhai B, Li D, Li X, Liu Y, Zhang J, Sun W, et al. Perceived school climate and problematic internet use among adolescents: mediating roles of school belonging and depressive symptoms. Addict Behav 2020;110:106501
crossref pmid


ABOUT
AUTHOR INFORMATION
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
Editorial Office
#522, G-five Central Plaza, 27 Seochojungang-ro 24-gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06601, Korea
Tel: +82-2-537-6171  Fax: +82-2-537-6174    E-mail: psychiatryinvest@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Neuropsychiatric Association.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next