Association Between Childhood Trauma and Somatization in a Clinical Sample: The Mediating Roles of Rumination, Cognitive Reappraisal, and Expressive Suppression

Article information

Psychiatry Investig. 2026;23(2):210-219

Publication date (electronic) : 2026 January 20

doi : https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2025.0172

Mi-Sun Lee ¹^,²

, Mimi Lee ³^,⁴

, Hyeong Beom Kim ³^,⁵

, Hyu Jung Huh^,³^,⁶

¹Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

²Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea

³Department of Psychiatry, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea

⁴Department of Psychology, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea

⁵Department of Social Welfare, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

⁶Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence: Hyu Jung Huh, MD, PhD Department of Psychiatry, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 56 Dongsu-ro, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon 21431, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-32-280-7495, Fax: +82-32-280-7495, E-mail: arbor99@gmail.com

Received 2025 May 21; Revised 2025 July 28; Accepted 2025 November 17.

Abstract

Objective

This study investigated the relationships among childhood trauma, somatization, depressive rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression among a clinical sample through a mediation model approach.

Methods

Outpatients (n=125) with a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety were included in our study. Childhood trauma, somatization, depressive rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression were assessed by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), Symptom Checklist-90-Revision (SCL-90-R), Korean-Ruminative Response Scale (K-RRS), and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), respectively.

Results

Childhood trauma was associated with somatization symptoms mediated by depressive rumination and cognitive reappraisal. In particular, emotional abuse was positively associated with somatization mediated by a depressive rumination. However, the mediating effect of expressive suppression on the relationship between childhood trauma and somatization was not significant.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that depressive rumination is a key element affecting somatization symptoms in clinical patients who experienced emotional abuse.

Keywords: Depressive rumination; Cognitive reappraisal; Expressive suppression; Childhood trauma; Somatization

INTRODUCTION

“Somatization” is the development or persistence of unexplained somatic distress [1]. Somatization represents a wide range of characteristics including pain from different areas of the body and pseudo-neurological or gastrointestinal symptoms [2,3]. The majority of somatization symptoms has been associated with difficulties in emotional regulation or childhood trauma [4]. Recently, it has been shown that emotional and cognitive factors, which could arise from childhood trauma, might mediate the causality from childhood trauma to somatization in adulthood [5,6].

Childhood trauma is caused by negative events that overwhelm an individual’s ability to cope, including neglect, abandonment, abuse, and accidents [7]. Childhood trauma may have long-term mental and physical health effects such as an increased risk of psychiatric disorders in adulthood [8]. Individuals exposed to multiple or severe traumatic events during childhood have been more likely to experience physical symptoms in adulthood [9-11]. In particular, childhood trauma may lead to somatization symptoms as well as rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression [12].

Rumination is considered a maladaptive coping strategy that exacerbates or maintains negative emotions [13,14]. Rumination’s critical feature is that the thoughts involved are self-related [15]. Rumination is regarded as a symptomatic characteristic of depression and is indicated as a vulnerability factor of depressive symptoms [16]. People with rumination frequently focus negatively on self-related stimuli or interpret external stimuli as negatively relating to themselves [17]. Several studies have reported rumination as a mediator between childhood trauma and somatization [17-19].

Cognitive reappraisal is an adaptive coping strategy that people can use to manage stress [20]. It may include reframing to a more positive perspective on stressful events and circumstances [21]. Cognitive reappraisal could help decrease somatization by encouraging individuals to perceive the issue from a constructive perspective [22]. Other studies have shown that the negative effects of childhood trauma on somatization symptoms are mediated by cognitive reappraisal [23]. Research has also suggested that cognitive reappraisal may lead to a reduction in physical symptoms associated with anxiety and stress [21].

Expressive suppression may constitute a central mechanism underlying emotion regulation difficulties following childhood trauma [24,25]. This strategy, characterized by attempts to inhibit the outward expression of emotions in specific contexts, can serve as a means of attenuating affective responses triggered by traumatic experiences [26]. However, excessive reliance on expressive suppression may hinder the effective processing of trauma-related negative emotions and obstruct adaptive coping strategies, thereby perpetuating heightened emotional distress [27]. In the short term, expressive suppression may function as an avoidance-oriented strategy to temporarily alleviate psychological pain; yet, over time, it is likely to contribute to sustained psychological distress and the emergence of associated somatic symptoms [25].

While the relationships between childhood trauma and somatization have been established, there is a lack of understanding of and evidence for the basic mechanisms. Furthermore, studies have investigated rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression separately. To our knowledge, these variables have not been analyzed together in regard to childhood trauma and somatization.

Therefore, this study used the generalized linear model (GLM) to analyze the relationships among childhood trauma, somatization, rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression in clinical patients diagnosed with depression and/or anxiety disorder. In particular, rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression were investigated as mediator factors of the association between childhood trauma and somatization. We hypothesize that adults with childhood trauma may have high levels of rumination and expressive suppression and may lack the capacity for cognitive reappraisal. Additionally, we predicted that these traits would affect somatization symptoms. Furthermore, we investigated whether subtypes of childhood trauma had differential impacts on somatization as mediated by rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression.

METHODS

Participants

We recruited patients who visited the Mood and Anxiety Disorders Unit at Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, from April–December 2021. All recruited patients had a principal diagnosis of nonpsychotic depressive disorder or anxiety disorder based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition diagnostic criteria. These diagnoses were made by a psychiatrist using the diagnostic Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview [28]. Patients were eligible if they were 18–65 years old and literate in Korean. The exclusion criteria included a lifetime diagnosis of psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, mental retardation, or any mental disorder resulting from a general medical condition. A total of 125 outpatients who met the inclusion criteria participated in this study and completed all study measures. All subjects provided written informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ethics Committee of Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital at The Catholic University of Korea (No: OC21FISI0055).

Measurements

Independent variable

Childhood trauma was evaluated using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) [29]. The subtypes of childhood trauma include emotional abuse, emotional neglect, physical abuse, physical neglect, and sexual abuse. The CTQ consists of 28 items (5-point scale) and ranges in total scores for subtypes of trauma from 5–25. A higher score indicates greater severity of childhood trauma. In this study, the reliability of CTQ was 0.771.

Dependent variables

Somatization was assessed using the Symptom Checklist-90-Revision (SCL-90-R) [30], a multidimensional scale developed to screen for psychological symptoms and psychopathological features. Regarding the SCL-90-R, the somatization subscale consists of 12 items (5-point scale) and ranges in total score from 0–48. Somatization is defined as bodily dysfunction (e.g., headaches, cardiovascular, pain) [31]. A higher score indicates a higher level of somatization. In our study, the reliability of the somatization subscale in SCL-90-R was 0.906.

Mediation variables

Rumination was evaluated using the Korean-Ruminative Response Scale (K-RRS) [13], a widely used scale for evaluating ruminative response. In this study, the reliability of K-RRS was 0.932.

Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression were assessed using the Korean version of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (K-ERQ) [32], which consists of 10 items (seven-point scale) and ranges in total score from 7–70. The cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression subscale consisted of 6 and 4 items, respectively [23]. In the current study, the reliability of K-ERQ was 0.773.

Sociodemographic variables

Sociodemographic variables were age, gender, education level (high school graduation, college, and higher), employment status (employed and unemployed), and marital status (married and other).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistical analysis and Pearson’s correlation analysis were conducted using SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp.). In this model, the independent variable was total CTQ score, and the dependent variable was score of SCL-90-R. The K-RRS, K-ERQ_C (cognitive reappraisal), and K-ERQ_R (expressive suppression) sub-scores from the K-ERQ were mediating variables. Sociodemographic variables were covariates. To analyze the mediating effect, the GLM was conducted using the Rbased Jamovi 2.3.21 software program (Sydney, Australia; http://www.jamovi.org) [33].

We analyzed several goodness-of-fit measures to assess how well the hypothesized model fit the observed data: χ², comparative fit index (CFI), Tuker Lewis Index (TLI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). In general, a model with good fit shows CFI and TLI values of at least 0.90 and an RMSEA value of 0.06 or less. In this study, the fit indices for the model were χ²=197.105 (p<0.001), CFI=0.957, TLI=0.901, and RMSEA=0.048.

We analyzed multiple mediations with K-RRS, K-ERQ_C, and K-ERQ_R as the mediating variables, CTQ subtype (emotional abuse, emotional neglect, physical abuse, physical neglect, and sexual abuse) as independent variables, and SCL-90-R_S as the dependent variable to evaluate whether the effects of subtypes of childhood trauma were significant for somatization and whether they were mediated by depressive rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression. In addition, we conducted bootstrapping to assess the significance of the mediating effects. The statistical significance level was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of the 125 participants. Of the total, 76.0% of respondents were female (mean age=39.26±13.79 years). Among participants, 40.0% were employed, 45.6% had graduated from college or above, and 32.8% were married. The mean K-CTQ score was 10.11±3.85, indicating a high level of childhood trauma in the study populations. The mean K-RRS score was 58.99±15.08, which indicates a high level of clinically significant rumination. The mean ERQ_C and ERQ_R scores were 4.12±1.31 and 4.16±1.32, respectively. The mean SCL-90-R_S score was 26.05±10.28, indicating high levels of reported somatization symptoms.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of participants (N=125)

Table 2 presents the correlations between childhood trauma, rumination, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, and somatization. Childhood trauma was positively correlated with rumination (r=0.380, p<0.01) and somatization (r=0.498, p<0.01) and negatively correlated with cognitive reappraisal (r=-0.249, p<0.01). However, childhood trauma was not significantly correlated with expressive suppression. Rumination was positively correlated with expressive suppression (r=0.204, p<0.05) and somatization (r=0.432, p<0.01) and negatively correlated with cognitive reappraisal (r=-0.341, p<0.01). Cognitive reappraisal was negatively correlated with somatization (r=-0.416, p<0.01) but was not significantly correlated with expressive suppression.

Table 2.

Correlations between childhood trauma, rumination, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, and somatization

Table 3 lists the indirect effects in the model of childhood trauma and somatization mediated by rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression. The path coefficients from childhood trauma to rumination (β=0.374, p<0.001) and from rumination to somatization (β=0.169, p<0.001) were significant. The path coefficients from childhood trauma to cognitive reappraisal (β=-0.096, p<0.01) and from cognitive reappraisal to somatization (β=-2.150, p<0.001) were also significant. However, the path from childhood trauma to expressive suppression was not significant, though the direct path from expressive suppression to somatization was significant (β=1.285, p<0.001). The bootstrapping index of the indirect effect was not significant when expressive suppression was included as a mediating variable.

Table 3.

Correlations between sub types of childhood trauma, rumination, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, and somatization

Table 4 illustrates the results of a multiple mediation analysis examining the indirect associations between childhood trauma and somatization through three psychological mediators: rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression. The mediation pathway via rumination was statistically significant, yielding an unstandardized indirect effect of 0.260 (standard error [SE]=0.110, z=2.63, p=0.009), with a 95% bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.066 to 0.454, and a standardized coefficient (β) of 0.098. Similarly, cognitive reappraisal demonstrated a significant mediating effect (estimate 0.180, SE=0.081, z=2.22, p=0.027), with a 95% CI of 0.021 to 0.338 and β=0.068. In contrast, the indirect effect via expressive suppression did not reach statistical significance (estimate=0.040, SE=0.038, z=1.04, p=0.298), and the CI encompassed zero (95% CI: -0.035 to 0.114; β=0.015). These findings suggest that rumination and cognitive reappraisal function as significant psychological mechanisms linking childhood trauma to somatic symptoms, whereas expressive suppression does not appear to play a mediating role in this context.

Table 4.

The indirect effects in the model of childhood trauma and somatization mediated by rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression

Table 5 shows the results of simple mediation models assessing the indirect and direct effects of childhood trauma on somatization through three mediators: rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression. When rumination was examined as a mediator, childhood trauma significantly predicted increased rumination (a=0.374, p<0.001), which in turn was positively associated with somatization (b=0.169, p<0.01), yielding a significant indirect effect of 0.265 (p<0.01). The direct effect of childhood trauma on somatization remained significant (c=1.325, p<0.001), indicating partial mediation. For cognitive reappraisal, childhood trauma negatively predicted the use of reappraisal strategies (a=-0.096, p<0.01), while greater cognitive reappraisal was strongly associated with reduced somatization (b=-2.150, p<0.001). The resulting indirect effect was statistically significant (0.207, p<0.05), with a significant residual direct effect (c=1.117, p<0.001), again supporting partial mediation. In contrast, expressive suppression did not serve as a significant mediator: the indirect effect (0.040) was not statistically significant, and both the a-path (a=0.048) and b-path (b=0.834) failed to reach significance. Nevertheless, the direct effect of childhood trauma on somatization remained significant in this model as well (c=1.285, p<0.001). Collectively, these findings suggest that rumination and cognitive reappraisal partially mediate the relationship between childhood trauma and somatic symptoms. In contrast, expressive suppression does not appear to play a significant intermediary role.

Table 5.

Mediation effects on childhood trauma and somatization by simple mediation analysis

Table 6 reports the results of a multiple mediation analysis investigating whether specific subtypes of childhood trauma exert indirect effects on somatization through rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression. Notably, emotional abuse was the only subtype that demonstrated a significant indirect effect via rumination (estimate=0.159, SE=0.085, z=1.878, p=0.006), with a 95% bias-corrected bootstrap CI of 0.007 to 0.324 and β=0.086. Other trauma subtypes, including emotional neglect, physical abuse, physical neglect, and sexual abuse, did not exhibit significant indirect effects through any of the proposed mediators, as all CIs contained zero and corresponding p-values exceeded conventional thresholds. Additionally, none of the trauma subtypes showed significant indirect effects through expressive suppression, and the indirect paths through cognitive reappraisal were also nonsignificant across all subtypes. These results highlight the specific impact of emotional abuse on somatization symptoms, mediated by increased levels of rumination, while suggesting limited mediating roles for cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression across other trauma subtypes.

Table 6.

Multiple mediation analysis of rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression in the relationship between subtype of childhood trauma and somatization

Supplementary Table 1 demonstrates that childhood trauma is a significant predictor of somatization even after controlling for depression. Childhood trauma exhibited both direct and indirect effects on somatization after adjusting for depression, with statistically substantial mediation observed through rumination (β=0.217, p=0.017) and cognitive reappraisal (β=0.174, p=0.035), but not expressive suppression (p=0.583). The direct effect of childhood trauma on somatization remained significant (β=0.185, p=0.015). Among subtypes of childhood trauma, emotional abuse was linked to somatization via rumination (β=0.079, p=0.047). In contrast, other mediation pathways involving emotional neglect, physical abuse, physical neglect, and sexual abuse did not reach statistical significance (all p>0.05).

Figure 1 represents the associations among childhood trauma and somatization, as mediated by rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression.

Figure 1.

Mediation of relationship between childhood trauma and somatization through rumination, cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression: Path coefficients were standardized. **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

DISCUSSION

The current study investigated whether depressive rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression mediate the effects of childhood trauma on somatization symptoms.

Our results found that childhood trauma was associated with somatization symptoms in the study sample. This finding is similar to earlier findings that childhood trauma affected somatization in patients with major depressive disorder [12]. These results were in accordance with studies that childhood trauma is key in the psychosocial and emotional development to adulthood [4,34]. Individuals with a history of childhood trauma indicated more frequent somatization or medically unexplained symptoms than non-traumatized individuals [35]. Accordingly, our study had shown that childhood trauma, such as emotional abuse or neglect, sexual abuse, and physical abuse, may lead to somatization symptoms in adulthood.

The current study showed significant indirect effects of childhood trauma on somatization as mediated by rumination and cognitive reappraisal. Our results support previous findings about the relationship between childhood trauma and poor mental health outcome as mediated by remination [36,37]. Rumination may be more common in adults who have been exposed to adverse childhood experiences [38,39]. Experience of childhood trauma often is not discussed or shared and can lead to a ruminative cognitive style. An increased level of ruminative response after childhood trauma can decrease the probability of resolving issues that could alleviate adverse effects [40]. Moreover, rumination could increase isolation and reduce social support; thus, it may lead to negative memories and somatization symptoms [41].

Many studies have reported negative correlations between childhood trauma and cognitive reappraisal ability, and many others have shown that lack of cognitive reappraisal ability has a mediating effect on the relationships between childhood trauma and various adult psychopathologies such as depression and anxiety [42,43]. According to Gross’s emotional regulation model, reappraisal may be adaptive and protective [44]. Reappraisal is an antecedent-focused emotion regulation strategy because it focuses on helping individuals reinterpret and better understand the nature and significance of a situation or stimulus and motivates actions at the early stage of the emotion-generation process. The aforementioned characteristics of reappraisal make it possible to effectively control improper emotional expression, improve a negative subjective emotional experience, and reduce the severity of emotional physiological response [45-47]. Therefore, it can be inferred that the lack of reappraisal ability leads to a state in which it is difficult to control emotional physiological responses, the persistence of which can appear as various somatic symptoms.

Importantly, these mediation effects of rumination and cognitive reappraisal persisted even after controlling for depressive symptoms. The supplemental analysis demonstrated that childhood trauma retained significant direct and indirect pathways to somatization, with rumination and cognitive reappraisal both emerging as robust mediators independent of depression. This finding suggests that the influence of trauma on somatization is not merely a byproduct of comorbid depressive symptomatology, but rather reflects trauma-specific cognitive and emotional processes. In particular, excessive rumination may maintain maladaptive self-focused thinking patterns, while deficient cognitive reappraisal may hinder adaptive reframing of distressing experiences. Together, these processes constitute parallel yet complementary mechanisms through which childhood trauma exerts long-lasting effects on somatic symptoms.

Meanwhile, our study found no significant effects of childhood trauma on somatization as mediated by expressive suppression. Over the years, many approaches, including psychoanalytic theory, have considered expressive suppression as a major psychological mechanism and cause of somatization [48]. Several clinical researchers have shown that individuals who have an impaired capacity for verbalization of emotions are vulnerable to somatization of emotional distress [49-51]. In this way, unverbalized psychological stress appears as physical symptoms. In addition, from the perspectives of classical psychoanalysis, emotions and fantasies related to repression of intrapsychic conflicts are central in contributing to somatic problems [52,53]. Although repression differs from expressive suppression in that it is an unconscious process, whereas expressive suppression is a conscious strategy, both share the common feature of inhibiting unpleasant emotions [26,54]. However, several empirical studies on the relationship between inhibiting emotions and somatization symptoms have reported inconsistent results. Some studies have reported that people who are unable to express uncomfortable emotions and tend to repress them often complain of physical symptoms [55]. However, other studies have reported no significant relationship between emotional expressive suppression and somatization symptoms [56,57].

Furthermore, in the context of childhood trauma, expressive suppression may not be the main psychological mechanism in the manifestation of somatization symptoms. In persons who have experienced childhood trauma, somatization symptoms may be trauma symptoms created by mechanisms such as hyper- or hypoarousal [58]. From this perspective, exposure to a trauma causes lasting physiological alternation in one’s reaction to aversive stimuli, which may lead to various somatization symptoms [58,59]. In this context, dissociation or rumination, rather than expressive suppression, may be central in the process of somatization in traumatized individuals [60,61]. Dissociation has properties similar to expressive suppression in terms of avoiding psychological pain but is a distinct concept. Future research should consider the effects of trauma-related psychopathology such as dissociation on somatization symptoms.

The current study also found that childhood trauma is related to somatization severity in adulthood. Regarding subtypes of childhood trauma, the indirect effect of rumination was only significant in the relationship between emotional abuse and somatization. Based on the results of previous studies, among the subtypes of childhood trauma, emotional abuse seems to have the greatest impact on mental health in adulthood. Repeated emotional abuse, particularly in the early years of life, can lead to unregulated arousal [62,63]. Such a state can result in various types of somatic symptoms related to hyper-arousal or hypo-arousal [62]. Furthermore, childhood emotional abuse involves enduring patterns of mistreatment, such as constant criticism, humiliation, rejection, or belittling by caregivers or authority figures during a person’s formative years [64]. Childhood emotional abuse can lead to internalized negative beliefs about oneself, low self-esteem, and difficulty regulating emotions [42,65]. In response to this distress, individuals may engage in rumination as a negative coping strategy. Rumination involves dwelling on negative emotions and experiences associated with the abuse, potentially intensifying one’s emotional responses [17,66]. The prolonged and intensified negative emotions resulting from rumination can contribute to somatization [67].

Other forms of childhood trauma appeared to be associated with somatization symptoms, but the indirect effects of rumination, cognitive reinterpretation, and expressive suppression were not significant. It is possible that neglect trauma, sexual abuse, and physical abuse may have contributed to somatization symptoms through different mechanisms. Future research will need to examine the various factors that mediate the relationship between childhood trauma and somatization symptoms.

Taken together, these findings suggest that various forms of psychological interventions that enhance cognitive restructuring and reduce ruminative responses may help reduce somatization symptoms in patients who have experienced childhood trauma. Therefore, the development of cognitive behavioral therapy protocols and interventions that focus more on fostering deficient cognitive restructuring skills and addressing excessive ruminative responses may be needed to help patients who report somatization symptoms after childhood trauma.

There are some limitations to this study. First, our study was cross-sectional in design. Future longitudinal studies of adverse childhood experiences are needed to demonstrate causal relationships. Second, assessments regarding such issues as childhood trauma, somatization, depressive rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression were based on self-reported questionnaires. It may be that participants with depression or anxiety symptoms distorted representations of their childhood traumatic memories. Thus, the interpretation of the results should be cautious. Third, other factors related to childhood trauma, such as the timing or length of the traumas and relationships with the perpetrators, were not evaluated. Such factors might also influence current symptom severity. In the future, longitudinal studies that track various psychological variables over time in children who have experienced childhood trauma into adulthood will be necessary to clarify causal relationships more precisely. This approach will make it possible to more clearly determine how factors such as the timing and duration of childhood trauma influence somatization symptoms and related mediators examined in the present study. Fourth, although the sample size was adequate for an exploratory mediation model, it may be insufficient to detect small indirect effects with high statistical power, particularly in a clinical sample. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution, and replication with larger and more diverse samples is warranted.

Despite these limitations, this study offers important clinical insights by examining the indirect effects of key emotion regulation strategies-rumination, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression-on the association between childhood trauma and somatization in a clinical sample of patients with depressive and anxiety disorders. Contrary to theoretical perspectives, including psychoanalytic accounts that link the suppression of unpleasant emotions to somatization, our findings suggest that reducing rumination and enhancing cognitive reappraisal may be more critical for symptom reduction. Accordingly, interventions targeting these cognitive processes, rather than focusing solely on emotional expression, may be more effective in clinical settings.

In conclusions, this study suggests significant evidence from clinical patients of the mediating role of depressive rumination and cognitive reappraisal between childhood trauma and somatization symptoms. Our findings suggest that rumination is a key element for outpatients who experienced childhood emotional abuse and currently present somatization symptoms. Thus, in clinical practice, interventions to reduce ruminative responses and foster cognitive reinterpretation may help reduce various forms of somatization in patients who have experienced childhood trauma.

Supplementary Materials

The Supplement is available with this article at https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2025.0172.

Supplementary Table 1.

Generalized linear model mediation analysis after adjusting for depression

pi-2025-0172-Supplementary-Table-1.pdf

Notes

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: all authors. Data curation: all authors. Formal analysis: Mi-Sun Lee. Funding acquisition: Hyu Jung Huh. Investigation: all authors. Methodology: all authors. Supervision: Hyu Jung Huh. Writing—original draft: Mi-Sun Lee, Hyu Jung Huh. Writing—review & editing: all authors.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by a grant for a Translational R&D Project through the Institute for Bio-Medical Convergence, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, and by the Korea Research Foundation (2021R1G1A1094285).

Acknowledgments

None

References

1. Iloson C, Möller A, Sundfeldt K, Bernhardsson S. Symptoms within somatization after sexual abuse among women: a scoping review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021;100:758–767.

2. Mai F. Somatization disorder: a practical review. Can J Psychiatry 2004;49:652–662.

3. Jadhakhan F, Lindner OC, Blakemore A, Guthrie E. Prevalence of medically unexplained symptoms in adults who are high users of health care services: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 2019;9:e027922.

4. Taylor GJ. Affects, trauma, and mechanisms of symptom formation: a tribute to John C. Nemiah, MD (1918-2009). Psychother Psychosom 2010;79:339–349.

5. Spertus IL, Yehuda R, Wong CM, Halligan S, Seremetis SV. Childhood emotional abuse and neglect as predictors of psychological and physical symptoms in women presenting to a primary care practice. Child Abuse Negl 2003;27:1247–1258.

6. Waldinger RJ, Schulz MS, Barsky AJ, Ahern DK. Mapping the road from childhood trauma to adult somatization: the role of attachment. Psychosom Med 2006;68:129–135.

7. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. SAMHSA’s Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4884 Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2014. Retrieved from https://www.traumainformedcare.chcs.org/wp-content/uploads/samhsa_trauma_concept_paper.pdf. Accessed July 11, 2023.

8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) [Internet] Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/aces/about/index.html. Accessed September 29, 2025.

9. National Institute of Mental Health. Helping children and adolescents cope with traumatic events [Internet] Available at: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/helping-children-and-adolescents-copewith-disasters-and-other-traumatic-events. Accessed August 17, 2025.

10. Campbell KA. The neurobiology of childhood trauma, from early physical pain onwards: as relevant as ever in today’s fractured world. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2022;13:2131969.

11. Nelson CA, Scott RD, Bhutta ZA, Harris NB, Danese A, Samara M. Adversity in childhood is linked to mental and physical health throughout life. BMJ 2020;371:m3048.

12. Güleç MY, Altintaş M, İnanç L, Bezgin CH, Koca EK, Güleç H. Effects of childhood trauma on somatization in major depressive disorder: the role of alexithymia. J Affect Disord 2013;146:137–141.

13. Shin KM, Cho SM, Kim KH. A validation study of the Korean-ruminative response scale in Korean adolescents. Psychiatry Investig 2015;12:508–515.

14. Miller N, Pedersen WC, Earleywine M, Pollock VE. Artificial a theoretical model of triggered displaced aggression. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2003;7:57–97.

15. Hsu TY, Liu TL, Cheng PZ, Lee HC, Lane TJ, Duncan NW. Depressive rumination is correlated with brain responses during self-related processing. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2021;46:E518–E527.

16. Kelly O, Matheson K, Ravindran A, Merali Z, Anisman H. Ruminative coping among patients with dysthymia before and after pharmacotherapy. Depress Anxiety 2007;24:233–243.

17. Fang X, Wu Z, Wen L, Zhang Y, Wang D, Yu L, et al. Rumination mediates the relationship between childhood trauma and depressive symptoms in schizophrenia patients. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2023;273:1085–1094.

18. Spinhoven P, van Hemert AM, Penninx BW. Repetitive negative thinking as a predictor of depression and anxiety: a longitudinal cohort study. J Affect Disord 2018;241:216–225.

19. Kearns NP, Shawyer F, Brooker JE, Graham AL, Enticott JC, Martin PR, et al. Does rumination mediate the relationship between mindfulness and depressive relapse? Psychol Psychother 2016;89:33–49.

20. Powers JP, Kako N, McIntosh DN, McRae K. Competitive interactions between cognitive reappraisal and mentalizing. Int J Psychophysiol 2022;174:17–28.

21. Kross E, Ayduk O, Mischel W. When asking “why” does not hurt. Distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychol Sci 2005;16:709–715.

22. Sachs-Ericsson N, Carr D, Sheffler J, Preston TJ, Kiosses D, Hajcak G. Cognitive reappraisal and the association between depressive symptoms and perceived social support among older adults. Aging Ment Health 2021;25:453–461.

23. Shon J. [Individual differences in two regulation strategies: cognitive reappraiser vs. emotion suppressor] [master’s thesis] emotion suppressor] [master’s thesis]th ed. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2005.

24. McCullen JR, Counts CJ, John-Henderson NA. Childhood adversity and emotion regulation strategies as predictors of psychological stress and mental health in American Indian adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Emotion 2023;23:805–813.

25. Ion A, Bîlc MI, Pițur S, Pop CF, Szentágotai-Tătar A, Miu AC. Childhood maltreatment and emotion regulation in everyday life: an experience sampling study. Sci Rep 2023;13:7214.

26. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;85:348–362.

27. Ellis K, Kearney CA. Emotional regulation mechanisms regarding posttraumatic and depressive symptoms in maltreated youth. Front Public Health 2025;13:1527120.

28. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59(Suppl 20):22–33. quiz 34-57.

29. Kim D, Park SC, Yang H, Oh DH. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the childhood trauma questionnaire-short form for psychiatric outpatients. Psychiatry Investig 2011;8:305–311.

30. Derogatis LR, Rickels K, Rock AF. The SCL-90 and the MMPI: a step in the validation of a new self-report scale. Br J Psychiatry 1976;128:280–289.

31. Kim G, Kim J, Won H. [Korean manual of symptom checklist-90-revision] Seoul: Chung Ang Aptitude Publishing Co.; 1984. Korean.

32. Kim K, Kim SH, Kim S. Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the emotion regulation questionnaire (K-ERQ) in a clinical sample. Psychiatry Investig 2022;19:125–134.

33. JAMOVI. Jamovi (version 2.3.0 - 08 February 2022) [Computer Software] [Internet] Available at: https://www.jamovi.org/release-notes.html. Accessed March 02, 2023.

34. Fonagy P, Target M. Attachment and reflective function: their role in self-organization. Dev Psychopathol 1997;9:679–700.

35. Spitzer C, Barnow S, Gau K, Freyberger HJ, Grabe HJ. Childhood maltreatment in patients with somatization disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2008;42:335–341.

36. Philippi CL, Leutzinger K, Pessin S, Cassani A, Mikel O, Walsh EC, et al. Neural signal variability relates to maladaptive rumination in depression. J Psychiatr Res 2022;156:570–578.

37. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Wisco BE, Lyubomirsky S. Rethinking rumination. Perspect Psychol Sci 2008;3:400–424.

38. Mansueto G, Cavallo C, Palmieri S, Ruggiero GM, Sassaroli S, Caselli G. Adverse childhood experiences and repetitive negative thinking in adulthood: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Psychother 2021;28:557–568.

39. Kim JS, Jin MJ, Jung W, Hahn SW, Lee SH. Rumination as a mediator between childhood trauma and adulthood depression/anxiety in nonclinical participants. Front Psychol 2017;8:1597.

40. Whitmer AJ, Gotlib IH. Depressive rumination and the C957T polymorphism of the DRD2 gene. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2012;12:741–747.

41. Giorgio JM, Sanflippo J, Kleiman E, Reilly D, Bender RE, Wagner CA, et al. An experiential avoidance conceptualization of depressive rumination: three tests of the model. Behav Res Ther 2010;48:1021–1031.

42. Huh HJ, Kim KH, Lee HK, Chae JH. The relationship between childhood trauma and the severity of adulthood depression and anxiety symptoms in a clinical sample: the mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies. J Affect Disord 2017;213:44–50.

43. Xu B, Wei S, Yin X, Jin X, Yan S, Jia L. The relationship between childhood emotional neglect experience and depressive symptoms and prefrontal resting functional connections in college students: the mediating role of reappraisal strategy. Front Behav Neurosci 2023;17:927389.

44. Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology 2002;39:281–291.

45. Gross JJ. Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998;74:224–237.

46. Ochsner KN, Bunge SA, Gross JJ, Gabrieli JD. Rethinking feelings: an fMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. J Cogn Neurosci 2002;14:1215–1229.

47. Ray RD, McRae K, Ochsner KN, Gross JJ. Cognitive reappraisal of negative affect: converging evidence from EMG and self-report. Emotion 2010;10:587–592.

48. Miliora MT. Trauma, dissociation, and somatization: a self-psychological perspective. J Am Acad Psychoanal 1998;26:273–293.

49. Krystal H. Desomatization and the consequences of infantile psychic trauma. Psychoanal Inq 1997;17:126–150.

50. Krystal H. Integration and self-healing: affect, trauma, alexithymia Hillsdale: Analytic Press; 1988.

51. Gedo JE. The primitive psyche, communication, and the language of the body. Psychoanal Inq 1997;17:192–203.

52. Alexander F. Psychosomatic medicine: its principles and applications New York: W. W. Norton & Company; 1950.

53. Taylor GJ. Psychosomatic medicine and contemporary psychoanalysis Madison: International Universities Press, Inc; 1987.

54. Erdelyi MH. The unified theory of repression. Behav Brain Sci 2006;29:499–511. discussion 511-551.

55. Killgore WD, Stetz MC, Castro CA, Hoge CW. The effects of prior combat experience on the expression of somatic and affective symptoms in deploying soldiers. J Psychosom Res 2006;60:379–385.

56. Earnest LM. Somatization in sexually abused adolescent girls: relationships among locus of control, repression-sensitization, and somatization [dissertation] Los Angeles: California School of Professional Psychology; 1999.

57. Tull MT, Gratz KL, Salters K, Roemer L. The role of experiential avoidance in posttraumatic stress symptoms and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and somatization. J Nerv Ment Dis 2004;192:754–761.

58. van der Kolk BA. The body keeps the score: approaches to the psychobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder. In : van der Kolk BA, McFarlane AC, Weisaeth L, eds. Traumatic stress: the effects of overwhelming experience on mind, body, and society New York: Guilford Press; 1996. p. 214–241.

59. van der Kolk BA. The complexity of adaptation to trauma: self-regulation, stimulus discrimination, and characterological development. In : van der Kolk BA, McFarlane AC, Weisaeth L, eds. Traumatic stress: the effects of overwhelming experience on mind, body, and society New York: Guilford Press; 1996. p. 182–213.

60. Victor TL, Van Dyk KM. The role of early life trauma in somatization: implications for the clinical practice of neuropsychology. In : Boone KB, ed. Neuropsychological evaluation of somatoform and other functional somatic conditions New York: Routledge; 2017. p. 43–112.

61. Rodin G, de Groot J, Spivak H. Trauma, dissociation, and somatization. In : Bremner JD, Marmar CR, eds. Trauma, memory, and dissociation Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1998. p. 161–178.

62. John-Henderson NA, Counts CJ, Ginty AT. Associations between childhood abuse and COVID-19 hyperarousal in adulthood: the role of social environment. Front Psychol 2021;12:565610.

63. Kendall-Tackett KA. Physiological correlates of childhood abuse: chronic hyperarousal in PTSD, depression, and irritable bowel syndrome. Child Abuse Negl 2000;24:799–810.

64. Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Newcomb MD, Walker E, Pogge D, Ahluvalia T, et al. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the childhood trauma questionnaire. Child Abuse Negl 2003;27:169–190.

65. Reid-Russell A, Miller AB, Cvencek D, Meltzoff AN, McLaughlin KA. Lower implicit self-esteem as a pathway linking childhood abuse to depression and suicidal ideation. Dev Psychopathol 2022;34:1272–1286.

66. Gu H, Ma P, Xia T. Childhood emotional abuse and adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: the mediating role of identity confusion and moderating role of rumination. Child Abuse Negl 2020;106:104474.

67. Jungmann SM, Wagner L, Klein M, Kaurin A. Functional somatic symptoms and emotion regulation in children and adolescents. Clin Psychol Eur 2022;4:e4299.

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Variables	Value
Age (yr)	39.26±13.79
Gender, female	95 (76.0)
Education level (≥college)	57 (45.6)
Employment status (employment)	50 (40.0)
Marital status (married)	41 (32.8)
Childhood trauma (K-CTQ)	10.11±3.85
Rumination (K-RRS)	58.99±15.08
Cognitive reappraisal (ERQ_C)	4.12±1.31
Expressive suppression (ERQ_R)	4.16±1.32
Somatization (SCL-90-R_S)	26.05±10.28

	K-CTQ	K-RRS	ERQ_C	ERQ_R	SCL-90-R_S
K-CTQ	1	0.380^**	-0.249^**	0.157	0.498^**
K-RRS	0.380^**	1	-0.341^**	0.204^*	0.432^**
ERQ_C	-0.249^**	-0.341^**	1	0.060	-0.416^**
ERQ_R	0.157	0.204^*	0.060	1	0.176
SCL-90-R_S	0.498^**	0.432^**	-0.416^**	0.176	1

	Emotional abuse	Emotional neglect	Physical abuse	Physical neglect	Sexual abuse	K-RRS	ERQ_C	ERQ_R	SCL-90-R_S
1-1. K-CTQ_Emotional abuse	1	0.612^**	0.649^**	0.629^**	0.404^**	0.424^**	-0.303^**	0.146	0.486^**
1-2. K-CTQ_Emotional neglect	0.612^**	1	0.373^**	0.591^**	0.392^**	0.279^**	-0.202^*	0.159	0.310^**
1-3. K-CTQ_Physical abuse	0.649^**	0.373^**	1	0.477^**	0.475^**	0.257^**	-0.151	0.015	0.419^**
1-4. K-CTQ_ Physical neglect	0.629^**	0.591^**	0.477^**	1	0.437^**	0.244^**	-0.228^*	0.185^*	0.344^**
1-5. K-CTQ_Sexual abuse	0.404^**	0.392^**	0.475^**	0.437^**	1	0.257^**	-0.071	0.127	0.368^**
2. K-RRS	0.424^**	0.279^**	0.257^**	0.244^**	0.257^**	1	-0.341^**	0.204^*	0.432^**
3. ERQ_C	-0.303^**	-0.202^*	-0.151	-0.228^*	-0.071	-0.341^**	1	0.060	-0.416^**
4. ERQ_R	0.146	0.159	0.015	0.185^*	0.127	0.204^*	0.060	1	0.176
5. SCL-90-R_S	0.486^**	0.310^**	0.419^**	0.344^**	0.368^**	0.432^**	-0.416^**	0.176	1

Mediating variables (M)	Effect of childhood trauma on M (a)	Outcome: somatization
Mediating variables (M)	Effect of childhood trauma on M (a)	Effect of M on somatization (b)	Direct effect (c)	Indirect effect (a×b)
Rumination	0.374^***	0.169^**	1.325^***	0.265^**
Cognitive reappraisal	-0.096^**	-2.150^***	1.117^***	0.207^*
Expressive suppression	0.048	0.834	1.285^***	0.040

Path	Estimate	SE	95% bias-corrected CI		β	z	p
Path	Estimate	SE	Lower	Upper	β	z	p
Emotional abuse → Rumination → Somatization	0.159	0.085	0.007	0.324	0.086	1.878	0.006
Emotional neglect → Rumination → Somatization	-1.254	0.020	-0.039	0.038	-1.184	-0.006	0.995
Physical abuse → Rumination → Somatization	-0.012	0.037	-0.851	0.061	-0.007	-0.324	0.746
Physical neglect → Rumination → Somatization	-0.053	0.035	-0.157	0.51	-0.022	-0.998	0.318
Sexual abuse → Rumination → Somatization	0.319	0.256	-0.179	0.819	0.028	1.254	0.210
Emotional abuse → Cognitive reappraisal → Somatization	0.105	0.071	-0.035	0.244	0.057	1.472	0.141
Emotional neglect → Cognitive reappraisal → Somatization	0.024	0.029	-0.033	0.081	0.023	0.829	0.407
Physical abuse → Cognitive reappraisal → Somatization	-0.037	0.054	-0.142	0.068	-0.021	-0.686	0.493
Physical neglect → Cognitive reappraisal → Somatization	0.087	0.073	-0.056	0.230	0.037	1.198	0.231
Sexual abuse → Cognitive reappraisal → Somatization	-0.037	0.298	-0.621	0.547	-0.003	-0.124	0.901
Emotional abuse → Expressive suppression → Somatization	0.022	0.030	-0.037	0.082	0.012	0.732	0.464
Emotional neglect → Expressive suppression → Somatization	-4.714	0.010	-0.021	0.020	-4.534	-0.046	0.963
Physical abuse → Expressive suppression → Somatization	-0.015	0.024	-0.062	0.031	-0.009	-0.651	0.515
Physical neglect → Expressive suppression → Somatization	0.014	0.028	-0.040	0.069	0.006	0.508	0.611
Sexual abuse → Expressive suppression → Somatization	0.049	0.118	-0.183	0.281	0.004	0.416	0.677