Relationship between Childhood Maltreatment, Suicidality, and Bipolarity: A Retrospective Study

Article information

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Childhood abuse is the one of notorious social issues, causing the most severe physical and mental health problems.1 It significantly influences the mental health not only in childhood but also in later adulthood.2 Thus, it can cause people to suffer from mental disorder such as mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and alcohol in adulthood.34 Especially, strong evidence from some prospective or cross-sectional study reflects that childhood abuse is significantly related to the onset of MDD in both adolescence and adulthood.56 A recent meta-analysis also revealed that individuals with the early experience of abuse or neglect have a higher risk of developing depressive disorders than nonabused individuals.2 Moreover, the short variant of the serotonin transporter gene made people vulnerable to the effect of childhood abuse or neglect and caused their adult depressive episodes to a chronic course in some studies.7

Li et al.8 found that patients with BD reported also reported their childhood abuse and neglect. In addition, childhood abuse is associated with bipolar disorder and its clinical expression and may interact with genetic susceptibility factors.9 However, there are still few studies about the relationship between childhood abuse and bipolar disorder. Furthermore, to date there have been no reports of a relationship between childhood abuse and MDD with bipolarity or bipolar spectrum disorder, which has no manic or hypomanic episode but has the characteristics of BD.10

It was hypothesized that childhood adversity like abuse or neglect produce more bipolarity in MDD. More specifically, the aims of the current study were to determine whether childhood adversity contributes to the occurrence of MDD with bipolarity, and whether there is a relationship between childhood adversity and central serotonergic activity, as reflected by loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP), which is measured using auditory processing, has recently been introduced as a metric of serotonin activity.11 The LDAEP has been identified as being inversely associated with central serotonergic activity, with a large LDAEP reflecting low serotonergic neurotransmission and vice versa.12 The current study is a respective study, using the existence of childhood maltreatment and bipolarity based on medical records.

METHODS

In total, 132 outpatients aged between 20 and 65 years who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV)-text revision criteria for MDD were included at Ilsan Paik Hospital between 2014 and 2015 on the medical records. Subjects who had psychotic symptoms, any additional mental disorders on axis I or II of the DSM-IV were excluded to remove bias. None of the subjects had a history of hypomanic or manic episodes. In addition, the subjects had no history of antidepressant treatment within 1 week before first visiting our hospital. The baseline LDAEP of 62 subjects, which was used as a marker of serotonergic activity in our previous study,13 were collected in case of existing on medical records for further analysis, but finally, the baseline LDAEP of 36 patients, who revealed suicide ideation and ≥20 total BDI score, were selected for the analysis of homogenous data.

The subjects were divided into two groups according to the presence of childhood maltreatment (CM group) and no childhood maltreat (NCM group), using the Korean version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (K-CTQ),1415 which indicated subjects as positive for a history of childhood abuse or neglect based on the cutoff score of the total K-CTQ (i.e., 41 points).16 The K-CTQ is a self-report questionnaire that have five subscales of childhood abuse or neglect experience: physical abuse (PA), emotional abuse (EA), sexual abuse (SA), physical neglect (PN), and emotional neglect (EN). Each subscale consists of five items that are rated on a 5-point scale, from 1 (never true) to 5 (very often true). The subjects were also divided into the following two groups according to whether they had suffered no maltreatment or had suffered one or more types of maltreatment (i.e., no vs one or more maltreatments) based on the moderate-to-severe cutoff scores of five subscales: EA, ≥13; PA, ≥10; SA, ≥8; EN, ≥15; and PN, ≥10.16 Depression severity and bipolarity were assessed using Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Korean version of Mood Disorder Questionnaire (K-MDQ) respectively on the medical records. The K-MDQ consists of three main parts. In the first part, the K-MDQ questions about the existence of manic or hypomanic symptoms using 13 items. In the second part, it does whether these manic or hypomanic symptoms have been experienced at the same time, and in the last part, it also does the functional impairment due to these symptoms.17 K-MDQ indicated subjects as positive for a screening of bipolarity based on a cutoff score of total K-MDQ (i.e., 7 points).17 Based on this cutoff score, the subjects were divided into two groups indicating the presence of subthreshold bipolarity.

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, and written informed consent to participate was obtained from all patients before beginning the investigation.

RESULTS

A comparison of the demographic and clinical variables between the CM and NCM groups, defined according to the total K-CTQ score, is presented in Table 1. The mean total BDI, BDI item 9 (suicide idea), and total K-MDQ score differed significantly between the NCM group and the CM group. The mean scores of all the K-CTQ subscales were significantly higher in the CM than in the NCM group. The number of subjects with bipolarity was significantly higher in the CM than in the NCM group. In addition, two thirds subjects experienced the significant maltreatment in childhood.

Table 1

Comparison of demographic and clinical variables between the childhood maltreatment (CM) and no childhood maltreatment (NCT) groups, defined according to the cutoff (41 points) for the total Korean version of the Childhood Trauma Scale (K-CTQ) score

Table 2 presents the demographic and clinical variables among the subjects stratified according to bipolarity, defined according to the cutoff score for K-MDQ. The mean total BDI, K-CTQ, PA, SA, EA scores were significantly higher in the group with bipolarity than in that without bipolarity. The number of subjects with the experience of childhood maltreatment was significantly higher in the bipolarity than in the nonbipolarity group.

Table 2

Comparison of demographic and clinical variables between the bipolarity and nonbipolarity groups, defined according to the cutoff (7 points) for the total K-MDQ score

The total K-CTQ score was positively correlated with the total K-MDQ and Total BDI score (Figures 1 and 2). All the subscales of K-CTQ were positively correlated with the BDI item 9 and with the total BDI except SA and with K-MDQ scores except PN. Logistic regression indicated the significant association between EN, EA, SA, PA, and bipolarity (K-MDQ score).

Figure 1

Correlation between the Korean version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (K-CTQ) and the Korean version of Mood Disorder Questionnaire (K-MDQ). The total K-CTQ score was positively correlated with the total K-MDQ score (r=0.36, p<0.01).

Figure 2

Correlation between the Korean version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (K-CTQ) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The total K-CTQ score was positively correlated with the total BDI score (r=0.36, p<0.01).

Further analysis of the group (n=36) having the LDAEP value in the medical records was performed. The mean LDAEP value differed significantly between the NCM group and the CM group (t=-2.09, df=34, p=0.044) (Figure 3). In other words, the LDAEP of the CM group was higher than that of the NCM group. In addition, there was a positive correlation between LDAEP and PN score (r=0.39, p=0.019). The K-MDQ score was also positively correlated with SA and BDI item 9 (suicide ideation) score.

Figure 3

Comparison in LDAEP between no childhood maltreatment group (NCM) and childhood maltreatment group (CM). ^*the mean LDAEP value differed significantly between the NCM group and the CM group (t=-2.09, df=34, p=0.044).

DISCUSSION

Our retrospective data indicated the relationship between childhood maltreatment and bipolarity or suicidality in patients with MDD. In other words, the subjects of the CM group had higher scores of K-MDQ and the suicide item on BDI than did those in the NCM group. Especially, most of the subscales of K-CTQ such as PA, SA, EA, and EN were positively correlated with the BDI item 9 and K-MDQ. These mean that childhood maltreatment is associated with both increased risk of bipolarity and suicidality. Our previous pilot cross-sectional study also indicated a relationship between childhood maltreatment and bipolarity or suicidality in patients with MDD.6 However, this pilot study had a very small sample size (n=35) as limitation. Thus, the current study seems to replicate our previous results and strengthen this hypothesis that childhood maltreatment potentiates the bipolarity and suicidality in MDD patients. Previous studies have demonstrated that childhood maltreatment was associated with the increased risk for mood disorder.3918 Some investigators reported that childhood maltreatment increased risk for lifetime depressive disorders.18 Others reported that a significant number of subjects with BD indicated childhood maltreatment.8 Recently, the exposure to childhood maltreatment potentiated the effects of recent stressors on adulthood mania.19 Thus, childhood maltreatment seems to increase the risk for mood disorder such as bipolar disorder. However, our results are so unique in that they are specific to MDD patients with increased bipolarity not BD. Thus, it is also possible that childhood maltreatment increase the severity of MDD such as impulsiveness, affective instability, and suicidality as well as the bipolarity.9 Especially, MDQ scale can reflect impulsiveness and affective instability, and borderline personality patients revealed high MDQ scores as well as bipolar patients.20 However, because borderline patients were not included in the current study, there was still inconclusive.

Further analysis of the LDAEP group revealed LDAEP of the CM group was higher than that of the NCM group. In other words, central serotonergic activity of the CM group was lower than that of the NCM group. A recent study revealed the relationship of the polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter gene and the effect of childhood maltreatment on adulthood depression.21 In addition, the relationship between serotonin gene and SA or PA, has been found in recurrent depressive disorder.7 Low serotonergic activity using LDAEP was also associated with suicidality.22 In addition, our previous study showed the relationship between LDAEP and bipolarity score.6 It has been hypothesized that inappropriate rewards and parental attitudes during childhood induce affective dysregulation in children with brain structural or functional abnormalities such as sertonergic dysfunction.5

The small sample size and retrospective study design in the current study are limitations. Especially, this study could rule out PTSD and borderline personality disorder because of a retrospective design. In addition, the K-MDQ is a screening scale to help identify bipolarity, and not a case-finding instrument for bipolarity itself. Some investigators claim that because of the MDQ's modest positive predictive value, most patients who screen positive will not have bipolar disorder.20 However, MDQ is also a useful scale except screening the bipolar disorder. Recently, Park and Lee23 found that depressed patients with bipolarity had a worse response to antidepressant monotherapy than did those without bipolarity using K-MDQ. Moreover, a clinician's prior probability estimate about the likelihood of bipolar disorder in a particular patient—based on a patient's history, family history, past treatment response, or other clinical impressions—has as much or more impact on the performance of the MDQ or BSDS as the test's sensitivity and specificity.24

In spite of these limitations, this is the study to evaluate the relationship between childhood maltreatment and bipolarity or suicidality. In conclusion, the findings of this study support that there is a relationship between childhood maltreatment and bipolarity or suicidality in patients with MDD. In future, more studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm the findings.

Article information Continued