Mediating Effect of Depressive Symptoms on the Relationship between Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Quality of Life
Article information
Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to investigate whether depressive symptoms affect the relationship between adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the quality of life (QOL) in Korean soldiers.
Methods
We evaluated past and present symptoms of adult ADHD (the Korean Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Scale and the Wender Utah Rating Scale), depression (the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale) and QOL (the Korean version of the SmithKline Beecham 'Quality of Life' scale) in 131 soldiers during mental health screenings performed by a local mental health center. A structured equation model using AMOS 19.0 was used to evaluate the mediating effect of depression.
Results
In our first model (without depressive symptoms), adult ADHD significantly affected QOL (standardized regression weight=-0.51, p<0.01). After depressive symptoms were added to this model, the direct effect of adult ADHD on QOL was not significant (standardized regression weight=0.10, p=0.43). Regarding the indirect effect, adult ADHD significantly affected depression (standardized regression weight=0.78, p<0.01), and depression also affected QOL (standardized regression weight=-0.79, p<0.01).
Conclusion
Through structural equation modeling, the complete mediation model for the influence of depressive symptoms on ADHD and QOL was confirmed. These findings indicated that it might be important to consider comorbidities, such as depression, when adult ADHD is being evaluated.
INTRODUCTION
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a disease characterized by attention-deficit, impulsivity and hyperactivity. It is known that 3% to 7% of school-age children have ADHD globally.1,2 ADHD is one of the most common neurological conditions in a clinical context. It affects daily, family and social functions, learning ability and cognitive ability.3 ADHD has been seen as a disorder that appears in childhood but improves or disappears when adulthood is reached. However, ADHD symptoms continued into adulthood in 50-65% of children with ADHD.4 The prevalence of ADHD is estimated at approximately 4% of the adult population. Some studies have called for proper clinical care for those adults showing ADHD symptoms.5
Although the effects of hyperactivity in children with ADHD have been widely discussed in earlier studies, ADHD symptoms in adults have been less studied. Nonetheless, the effects of inattention and impulsivity can be more adverse in adulthood.6 It has been reported that adults with ADHD have difficulties carrying out work tasks, dealing with people and complying with social rules, which makes daily functioning difficult. In addition, they may develop drug or alcohol abuse problems and mental illnesses, such as anti-social personality disorder.7 The consequences of such symptoms include frequent job changes, part-time jobs and low socioeconomic status.8 Adults with ADHD also have a higher rate of separation or divorce (compared to the national average) and experience severe mental conflict and social inadaptability.9 As a result, they have low levels of life satisfaction, according to earlier studies.10
ADHD in adulthood may result in anti-social personality disorder, adjustment disorder and anxiety disorder; however, depression has been described as the most common symptom of ADHD in many studies.11 More than 80% of adult patients with ADHD had at least one mental illness. One-third of these patients suffer from at least three different mental disorders.12 The likelihood of developing depression is five times greater in adults with ADHD compared to adults without ADHD. Adults with ADHD also experience an earlier onset of depression, increased morbidity, more severe symptoms and a higher suicide rate compared to adults without ADHD.13 Compared with the control group, the ADHD group with depression exhibited more difficulties at school or the workplace and lower treatment response rates, which implies the need for both drug and mental therapy.14 As ADHD is accompanied by a high prevalence of other mental conditions, the possibility of misdiagnosing adults with ADHD is high, which in turn makes diagnosis and treatment more difficult.15 When adults with ADHD fail to receive the appropriate treatment, they experience continuous problems with daily functioning, and their quality of life (QOL) declines as a result.
Previous studies have mainly addressed the behavioral disorders associated with ADHD in adults and examined the observable effects of drug treatment on thesebehaviors.16 Local studies of ADHD in adults have been insufficient because of the lack of reliable diagnostic criteria and assessment tools. In particular, studies investigating the effects of comorbidities on QOL are rare. This study was aimed to investigate the relationship between ADHD symptoms, depressive symptoms and QOL in soldiers who perform similar tasks in the same environment. At the same time, the effects of depressive symptoms on the relationship between ADHD and QOL were also analyzed.
METHODS
Subjects
Members of the regional mental clinic center were dispatched to an army base in a remote area and distributed questionnaires to 131 soldiers. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of items describing past and present ADHD symptoms, depression and QOL. The subjects were informed of the purpose of the study and told that the study data would be aggregated. All subjects signed consent agreements. The agreements and completed questionnaires were collected and sent to the regional mental clinic center. Questionnaires with missing responses were excluded from the analysis. Research protocols and the study process were approved by the Clinical Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Gyeongsang National University Hospital.
Assessment instruments
Korean Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Scale
K-AADHDS is a translated version of the DSM-IV Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Scale, which was developed by Murphy and Barkley. This scale is widely used for epidemiological studies in the local context. This self-administered instrument includes 18 DSM-IV ADHD items and consists of nine items measuring attention-deficit and nine items measuring impulsivity and hyperactivity. The frequency of ADHD symptoms experienced over the last six months was measured on a four-point scale (ranging from "almost never" to "very often"). The reliability and validity of the instrument were verified in a study involving 553 college students.17
Korean-Wender Utah Rating Scale
The Korean-Wender Utah Rating Scale (K-WURS) is a translated version of the 25-item instrument designed to diagnose ADHD in adults, which was developed by Wender in 1993. This self-administered questionnaire uses a five-point scale with 0 being "not at all" and 4 being "extremely". The scale results in a score ranging from 0 to 100 and a cutoff point of 46 and above; it is used to diagnose adult ADHD in the U.S. Although its reliability and validity have not yet been verified, this instrument has been employed in several South Korean studies to measure childhood ADHD symptoms in adults with ADHD.18
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale
The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D) is also a self-administered instrument comprised of 20 items that are used to measure depression, feelings of futility andguilt, helplessness, retarded psychomotor function, desperation and sleep disorder. Each item is designed to measure symptoms that have been experienced in the previous week, making the instrument suitable for epidemiological studies. The CES-D is commonly used to compare the prevalence of depression in terms of nation, population, age and sex. This scale was translated by Cho et al.19 for use in South Korea. A cut-off score of 24/25 is used to diagnose depression, and a score of 20/21 is used for epidemiological purposes.
Korean version of the SmithKline Beecham 'Quality of Life' Scale
The SBQOL, developed by Dunbar in 1992, was translated for use in Korea by Yoon et al.20 The K-SBQOL is comprised of 23 items that are grouped into eight sub-scales: psychological and physical well-being, feeling, social relationship, internalexternal control, work and job, financial status, activities and interest. The score on each item ranges from 1 to 10. Twelve items were reverse scored, and the total scores ranged from 23 to 230. This tool categorizes different mental statuses in three elements ('current self', 'ideal self' and 'sick self') and helps respondents assess their view of the world from the perspective of the different health statuses. This scale yields the QOL score of each element and can also determine inter-element distances. As this tool can be used repeatedly for measurements, it is possible to assess QOL changes over time, making it useful for many studies. Five elements were identified in a study conducted with 377 college students, including competence, psychological well-being, stability, physical well-being and vitality. This study confirmed its reliability and validity.
Statistical analysis of data
The collected data were statically analyzed to define the socio-demographic characteristics of the subjects and compute the mean score of items. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to define the strength of the association between ADHD symptoms and QOL and depression and QOL. A path analysis was also performed to measure the relationship between past and present ADHD symptoms and QOL and the mediated effects of depression on ADHD symptoms and QOL. A statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and AMOS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The socio-demographic characteristics of the subjects are described in Table 1. Pearson's correlation analysis of the K-AADHDS, K-WURS, CES-D and K-SBQOL scores revealed statistically significant correlations among all the items (p<0.01) (Table 2). Structural equation modeling was performed to analyze the relationship between ADHD symptoms and QOL in the first model and the relationship between ADHD symptoms, QOL and depressive symptoms in the second model. The model fit indices were NFI=0.95, IFI=0.97, TLI=0.96, CFI=0.97 and RMSEA=0.08. Without depressive symptoms, a negative correlation was observed between adult ADHD symptoms and QOL (standardized regression weight=-0.51, p<0.01) (Figure 1A). When depressive symptoms was included in the model, the direct effects of past and present ADHD symptoms on QOL were not significant (standardized regression weight=0.10, p=0.44). However, ADHD symptoms significantly affected depression (standardized regression weight=0.78, p<0.01). As for the total effects, the ADHD symptoms exhibited indirect effects on QOL through depression as a mediator (Figure 1B). Specifically, in the both model, past ADHD symptoms show more influence on latent variable, adult ADHD. The results of the structural equation modeling confirmed that depression served as a complete mediator of the relationship between ADHD symptoms in adults and QOL.
DISCUSSION
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ADHD symptoms, depressive symptoms and QOL and the effects of depressive symptoms on the relationship between ADHD symptoms and QOL. A negative correlation was observed between past and present ADHD symptoms in adults and their QOL. Depressive symptoms also played a complete mediator role in the relationship between ADHD symptoms and QOL in adults with ADHD.
Previous studies have suggested that the likelihood of developing depression is high in adults with ADHD.8,21 When ADHD was accompanied by depression, the patients were afflicted with worsened conditions, which subsequently impinged on their QOL.22 The results of this study are consistent with previous studies that determined ADHD symptoms significantly increased the severity of depression.
Adults with ADHD have many ADHD-specific outcomes, including learning and occupational difficulties and family and social functioning disorders. When comorbid conditions were present, the adverse effects increased in terms of QOL.23 In a study investigating the relationship between ADHD symptoms, QOL, depression and anxiety, the ADHD group exhibited higher levels of depression and anxiety and lower QOL compared to the control group.24 Previous studies have focused on the effects of ADHD and comorbidities on QOL, but the present study investigated the association between depression and ADHD symptoms. By identifying a direct mediator role for depression, this study distinguishes its findings from other studies.
According to studies published abroad, when ADHD is accompanied by comorbidities, ADHD exhibits variations in symptom expression, which makes it more difficult to treat ADHD and eventually leads to longer treatment durations and greater costs. Moreover, daily functioning (e.g., learning and occupational difficulties) deteriorated, and the risk of suicide increased.25 The reported consequences of ADHD and its comorbidities included unwanted pregnancy and the risk of sexually transmitted diseases resulting from impulsive sexual relationships, reduced income, increased domestic problems (e.g., divorce) and continued unemployment. QOL was threatened as a result.26 A local study of 6081 soldiers suggested the importance of the accurate assessment of the comorbidities accompanying ADHD. In that study, the ADHD group demonstrated an increase in alcohol and nicotine dependence, depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia, sleep disorders and the risk of suicide.27
When comorbidities are present in adults with ADHD, ADHD becomes more difficult to diagnose, as the symptom expression varies. Consequently, ADHD is not treated properly, despite deteriorating QOL.28 When adults with ADHD had low self-esteem, depression, oversensitivity, impulsivity, affective instability and uncontrolled anger, these symptoms could be misdiagnosed as borderline personality disorder or bipolar disorder. In those circumstances, ADHD treatment becomes uncertain.29 Untreated ADHD will continue to impair daily functioning and will eventually impact QOL, resulting in a decline in production and additional health care costs in a social context.30 Despite the afflictive manifestations of ADHD in adults, studies investigating the effects of comorbid conditions on QOL have been rare in South Korea. Over the last decade, 294 ADHD studies have been published. Of those studies, 16.7% addressed ADHD in adults, and none of these studies discussed the QOL of patients and the interrelationship between ADHD and QOL.31 In contrast, many foreign studies have already begun to address the issue of ADHD and comorbidities in adults as a source of serious family and social problems. Various assessment instruments have been developed with the aim of measuring the QOL of patients with ADHD.32 There is another scale about quality of life of Adult ADHD (AAQoL) even though it doesn't have validity in South Korea. The items of the AAQoL were generated based on data collected from clinical experts, patients, and published literature indicating that adult ADHD has an impact on functioning in five areas: work, daily activities, relationships, psychological well-being and physical well-being.33 Even though we also found effects on various subsets of QOL in this study, there is need to evaluate QOL using the disease specific QOL scale with various subsets. Therefore, it is imperative for researchers to develop evaluation methods for its comorbidities and assessment tools for QOL by considering the problems caused by ADHD.
The present study does have limitations. Firstly, as the data on previous ADHD symptoms in subjects were collected at a single point in time in a cross-sectional survey, the changes in variables over time and the association between ADHD symptoms and depression cannot be clearly explained. Secondly, using self-administered questionnaires may undermine the objectivity expected in symptom assessment, which might result in response shift and recall bias. Thirdly, given that the subjects were all soldiers in their 20s, generalizing the results of this study to any larger group is not justified. Forthly, we didn't consider other comorbidities such as addiction, anxiety disorders, other mood disorders which usually accompanied with adult ADHD and might affect on results of this study.
To establish standardized diagnostic criteria for ADHD, a questionnaire-based approach must be accompanied by observation and structured clinical interviews. The study subjects must be composed of people from different population groups, and there must be a tracking mechanism to follow children with ADHD into adulthood for a prospective analysis on depression and QOL. Any future study that overcomes the above mentioned limitations will provide useful information that can be used for ADHD and psychological treatments for adults with reduced QOL because of ADHD and its comorbidities. Given the high prevalence of comorbidities, such as depression, in adults with ADHD, it is crucial to develop assessment tools that are designed to accurately assess these comorbidities and QOL under local circumstances.