Psychiatry Investig Search


Psychiatry Investig > Volume 20(11); 2023 > Article
Saffari, Chang, Chen, Potenza, Yen, Chang, Huang, Tsai, and Lin: Sleep Quality and Self-Stigma Mediate the Association Between Problematic Use of Social Media and Quality of Life Among People With Schizophrenia in Taiwan: A Longitudinal Study



Problematic use of social media (PUSM) may affect sleep quality and self-stigma in people with schizophrenia and consequently reduce their quality of life (QoL). This longitudinal study investigated if sleep quality and self-stigma mediated relationships between PUSM and QoL.


One-hundred-and-ninety-three outpatients with schizophrenia were recruited from a psychiatric center in Taiwan from April 2019 to August 2021 and participated in a longitudinal study at intervals of three months between measurements. QoL was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire Brief Version; sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; self-stigma using the Self-Stigma Scale-Short; and PUSM using the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. Via SPSS 20.0, general estimating equation models assessed temporal associations between variables. Via R software, mediating effects of self-stigma and sleep quality were examined through Monte Carlo simulations with 20,000 repetitions.


Mean scores of physical, psychological, social and environmental QoL ranged from 11.86 to 13.02. Mean scores of sleep quality and self-stigma were 9.1±4.5 and 2.2±0.8, respectively. Sleep quality and self-stigma were directly related to QoL (p<0.001) and mediated indirect relationships between PUSM and all components of QoL with a range of 95% confidence intervals spanning from -0.0591 to -0.0107 for physical QoL; -0.0564 to -0.0095 for psychological QoL; -0.0292 to -0.0035 for social QoL; and -0.0357 to -0.0052 for environmental QoL.


Sleep quality and self-stigma mediated relationships between PUSM and QoL in people with schizophrenia. Developing interventions targeting PUSM, sleep, and self-stigma may help improve QoL in people with schizophrenia.


Schizophrenia is a chronic and serious mental disorder, affecting nearly one percent of people globally (more than 24 million people) [1]. Although the prevalence of schizophrenia seems roughly similar across jurisdictions, the age-standardized statistics indicate that Asian countries with lower prevalence and regions, such as the Middle East and East Asia, experience more negative impacts based on disability-adjusted life years [2,3]. A study assessing the prevalence of schizophrenia in China from 1990 to 2010 found a growing number of affected people during this period, growing from 3.09 million to 7.16 million, reflecting a 132% increase [4]. According to the National Health Insurance dataset, the cumulative prevalence rate was 6.42 per 1,000 persons in Taiwan in 2001 [5].
Schizophrenia as a long-term disability is characterized by impairments in thoughts, emotions, behaviors, and cognitive functions. Many affected individuals experience occupational and/or marital concerns [6]. Therefore, social problems, including social relationship and networking impairments, are common [7]. The World Health Organization has listed five important consequence of schizophrenia (i.e., mortality, social stigma, social cost, impact on caregivers, and social isolation), with social concerns being prominent [1].
Approximately one-third to two-thirds of individuals with mental disorders, like their unaffected peers, use social media to make friends, share information, and receive social contacts [8,9]. Affected individuals may also use social media to experience support and find treatments for their conditions of mental well-being and psychological symptoms [10]. Studies from 2008 to 2020 indicate an increasing rate (by about 50%) of internet use in people with psychiatric concerns. Social media may be perceived as a non-threatening space with less associated stress and anxiety for people with mental illness to interact socially [11-13]. Therefore, people with schizophrenia may engage in social media to be socially active, and such media may also be used to connect clinicians and patients to monitor clinical status and provide therapeutic consolations [8,10]. However, use of social media may also expose people with schizophrenia to potential risks such as worsening of symptoms, unwanted or impulsive disclosures, lost privacy and confidentiality, and possibly internet addiction and stigmatization [14].
Problematic use of social media (PUSM) use refers to the potential negative impacts of using internet platforms (i.e., social media like Facebook) for connecting with other people, with the level of engagement linked to addiction-like symptoms, mood fluctuations, preoccupation, psychological or functional impairments, and tolerance [15]. A review of potential risks and benefits of use of social media by people with schizophrenia suggested widespread use; however, less is known regarding the clinical risks or benefits of such growing usage [14]. Data suggest potential negative impacts of PUSM as one form of problematic use of the internet in people with schizophrenia [8]. Problematic use of internet has been correlated with psychotic-like experiences, suggesting possible similar experiences in people with schizophrenia [10,14]. Particular situations like lockdowns during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may have intensified use of the internet and social media both among the general population and people with schizophrenia, with possible particular negative influences on the clinical conditions of the latter group [16]. However, internet addiction and PUSM should be considered as different kinds of addiction-like behaviors because despite associations between these two phenomena (both use online connections), they may have unique attributes and uses that may differentiate them. Indeed, internet addiction may mostly occur when people become preoccupied excessively with and experience diminished control over internet use for different aims including education, communication, entertainment, and other purposes, whereas in PUSM, excessive use of electronic devices (and perhaps particularly cell-phones) may occur basically with the goal of social communications [17].
The impact of PUSM on quality of life (QoL) has been investigated in different populations. For example, more time spent on social media may limit adolescents from spending sufficient time engaging in physical activity and social relationships in non-virtual settings, and this may lead to decreased well-being and QoL [18]. In a recent cross-sectional study, the association between PUSM and QoL and mental health disorders among adolescents in Hong Kong revealed that those who used social media for less than three hours daily had better QoL and fewer mental health problems including anxiety and depression than those with PUSM [19]. Negative impacts of PUSM on QoL in other populations have also been documented [20]. Given that QoL in people with schizophrenia is often worse than that in healthy individuals and those with other health conditions, further assessments between the PUSM and QoL are required.
Sleep quality is also important to the well-being of people with schizophrenia [21]. Sleep disturbances are among the most prevalent problems experienced by people with schizophrenia, with approximately 30% to 80% of individuals experiencing sleep disturbances [22]. Poor sleep quality may not only reduce cognitive functioning, but also trigger psychotic symptoms that in turn may decrease QoL [23]. Among Chinese people with schizophrenia, about one-third reported sleep disturbances and insomnia, and sleep problems were associated with low QoL [24]. Studies of QoL and sleep problems in individuals with mental disorders including schizophrenia have found negative relationships between these domains [24-26]. PUSM may influence sleep quality in the general population and also in people with mental disorders [27,28]. However, less is known regarding how sleep quality may operate to influence QoL in people with schizophrenia.
Self-stigmatization is common among people with schizophrenia, and its associations with PUSM and QoL in people with psychological problems have been investigated [29,30]. Self-stigma is related to shame regarding individual differences, and people with mental illnesses may accept and internalize negative stereotypes [31]. Internalized self-stigma may act as a negative mental habit and negatively impact life satisfaction and QoL in response to feelings of discrimination [29]. People with schizophrenia often experience self-stigma during the course of treatment, and their social interactions may lead to low self-esteem, depression and feelings of hopelessness that may have detrimental impacts on QoL [32,33]. Self-stigma may moderate relationships between social functioning, self-efficacy and hope in people with schizophrenia [34,35]. However, a mediating role for self-stigma between PUSM and QoL has not been investigated in this population.
Data suggest that PUSM, QoL, sleep quality, and self-stigma in people with schizophrenia may be interrelated. A better understanding of mechanisms underlying relationships between PUSM and QoL would be helpful to reduce the negative impact of PUSM and improve the QoL among people with schizophrenia. Identifying possible roles for modifiable risk factors (e.g., sleep disturbances and self-stigma) may help with intervention development. Therefore, a conceptual model for this study is shown in Figure 1. We hypothesize there may be indirect associations between PUSM and QoL that may be explained through self-stigma and sleep quality. Identifying whether such relationships exist may help find pathways through which interventions may be developed to decrease negative effects of PUSM on QoL in people with schizophrenia. The current study hypothesized that sleep quality and self-stigma may operate as mechanisms linking PUSM and poor QoL in this population. Thus, the aims of this study involved: 1) assessing measures of PUSM, QoL, sleep quality, and self-stigma; 2) identifying temporal relationships between these variables; and 3) investigating potentially mediating effects of sleep quality and self-stigma on associations between PUSM and QoL over a 1-year follow-up.


Participants and recruitment process

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Jianan Psychiatric Center (IRB ref: 18-039 & 19-034), and the sample has been described in detail previously [36]. In brief, the present study’s participants were treated in day and outpatient treatment programs at the Jianan Psychiatric Center (JPC) in Tainan, Taiwan. The JPC is the largest national psychiatric center in Southern Taiwan and provides multiple psychiatric services [37]. The present sample was recruited under the supervision of trained research assistants between April 30, 2019 and August 6, 2021. Inclusion criteria were 1) having a diagnosis of schizophrenia based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 2013); 2) possessing a smartphone during the study period; and 3) being an adult (i.e., aged 20 years or above according to the Civil Law definition in Taiwan). All participants provided written informed consent prior to the study and completed the survey five times (12-month period at 3-month intervals [0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months]). The present study applied convenience sampling for recruitment and aimed to recruit at least 100 participants at the final follow-up according to the ratio of 10 participants per variable. Because the model planned in the present study included 10 variables, more than 100 participants were recruited for study. At baseline, 193 participants were recruited, with 103 participants at the final follow-up. Missing values were checked for randomness, and data were missing completely at random based on Little’s Missing Completely At Random test [36,38].



The present sample’s demographics included 1) age (reported in years); 2) sex (male or female); 3) marital status (single, married, or other); 4) years of education; and 5) physical disease (yes or no).


Participants’ QoL was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF), a self-reported instrument with 28 items in its Taiwanese version [39-41]. Among the 28 items, 26 were distributed into four QoL domains: physical (seven items), psychological (six items), social (four items), and environmental (nine items). The remaining two items assess general QoL and over health. Two WHOQOL-BREF items were not distributed into any QoL domain because they are general items asking overall QoL (item 1) and general health (item 2) [42,43]. Therefore, the two general items were not used in analyses. All items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. After reverse coding three negatively worded items and converting the item scores into domain scores (ranging between 4 and 20 for each domain), summed scores were generated, with higher scores reflecting better QoL [44]. The WHOQOL-BREF has been validated in Chinese, with Cronbach’s α values ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 [45,46].

Sleep quality

Participants’ sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a self-reported instrument with 19 items [47]. Answers were converted into seven component scores (each component score ranging between 0 and 3). Summed component scores (ranging between 0 and 21) were generated, with higher scores reflecting poorer sleep quality [36,48,49]. The PSQI has been validated in Chinese, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.83 [50].


Participants’ self-stigma was assessed using the Self-Stigma Scale-Short (SSS-S), a self-report instrument with nine items [51]. The SSS-S was developed within a cognitive-behavioral theorical framework. All items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with each item score ranging between 1 and 4. The nine SSS-S item scores were calculated using a mean score (i.e., summing the nine SSS-S item scores and then dividing by nine), with higher SSS-S scores reflecting higher levels of self-stigma [52-55]. The SSS-S has been validated in Chinese, with Cronbach’s α values ranging from 0.80 to 0.91 [56,57].


Participants’ PUSM was assessed using the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), a self-report instrument with six items [58]. The BSMAS was developed within the framework of Griffiths’ [59] components model of addiction. All items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (each item score ranging between 1 and 5). The six BSMAS item scores were summed, with higher BSMAS scores reflecting higher levels of PUSM [60-65]. The BSMAS has been validated in Chinese, with Cronbach’s α values ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 [66-68].

Data analysis

Participants’ characteristics and measure scores at baseline were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including means (standard deviations [SDs]) and frequencies (percentages). Next, six general estimating equation (GEE) models were constructed to understand temporal associations between variables. All GEE models utilized a random effect of time (i.e., the repeated measures of the mediators or outcome variables) and shared potential confounding variables of sex (reference group of male), age, marital status (reference group of single), years of education, and physical disease (reference group of yes). For the GEE models using sleep quality and self-stigma as dependent variables, PUSM was treated as the independent variable to assess associations with consideration of repeated measures. For the GEE models using QoL measures as dependent variables (i.e., physical, psychological, social, and environmental QoL), sleep quality and self-stigma were included as independent variables.
To examine potential mediating effects of sleep quality and self-stigma in the associations between PUSM and QoL, a Monte Carlo method was used [69,70]. Specifically, coefficients and standard errors (SE) derived from every two GEE models were used in R software to generate Monte Carlo simulations with 20,000 repetitions ( In the 20,000 repetitions, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the association. For example, the statistical procedures were 1) retrieving the coefficient and SE of sleep quality in the GEE model with physical QoL as an outcome variable; 2) retrieving the coefficient and SE of PUSM in the GEE model with sleep quality as an outcome variable; and 3) calculating the 20,000 repetitions to test whether sleep quality mediated the association between PUSM and physical QoL. A mediation is supported when the 95% CI does not include 0 [69]. Apart from mediating effects, all statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).


The present sample (n=193; mean age=41.34±9.01 years) consisted of more females (n=105; 54.4%) than males. Over half of the sample was single (n=122; 63.2%), and less than one-third of participants had a physical disease (n=62; 32.1%). On average, participants reported 12.14 (SD=2.58) years of education. Participants’ QoL, sleep quality, self-stigma, and PUSM are reported in Table 1.
The GEE models (Table 2) showed that PUSM was not a significant factor directly explaining any of the QoL domains: coefficient (SE/p-value)=0.02 (0.03/0.61) for physical QoL; -0.01 (0.03/0.72) for psychological QoL; -0.001 (0.03/0.98) for social QoL; and 0.01 (0.03/0.81) for environmental QoL. However, both sleep quality (coefficients=-0.12 to -0.27; p<0.001) and self-stigma (coefficients=-0.92 to -1.42; p<0.001) were significant factors related to QoL. Additionally, PUSM was found to be a significant factor relating to both sleep quality (coefficient=0.12; SE=0.04; p=0.003) and self-stigma (coefficient= 0.03; SE=0.008; p<0.001).
The Monte Carlo method additionally showed that sleep quality and self-stigma were significant mediators in the association between PUSM and QoL. For the mediator of sleep quality, the 95% CIs for indirect effects ranged from -0.0591 to -0.0107 for physical QoL; -0.0564 to -0.0095 for psychological QoL; -0.0292 to -0.0035 for social QoL; and -0.0357 to -0.0052 for environmental QoL (Figure 2). For the mediator of self-stigma, the 95% CIs for indirect effects ranged from -0.0132 to -0.0040 for physical QoL; -0.0126 to -0.0035 for psychological QoL; -0.0067 to -0.0012 for social QoL; and -0.0081 to -0.0017 for environmental QoL (Figure 3).


The current study investigated associations between PUSM, QoL, self-stigma, and sleep quality among people with schizophrenia, with a specific goal of examining how sleep quality and self-stigma may mediate relationships between PUSM and QoL over time. We sought to identify new pathways between PUSM and QoL to consider how potential interventions may address negative impacts of the former on the latter. Our findings indicated that although there were not significant direct effects of PUSM on QoL, sleep quality and self-stigma accounted for indirect effects between these domains, suggesting possible mechanisms by which PUSM may operate to reduce QoL in people with schizophrenia.
Although this was not an epidemiological study, the sample characteristics were similar to those from other cross-sectional studies. For example, in a study on a multicenter sample of people with schizophrenia, Xiang et al. [71] reported more than half of their sample was unmarried with a mean education of 12.2±2.3 years, with a mean age of 32.6±10.8 years. They also found that factors such as stable marriages and lower educational attainment may be common in people with schizophrenia, and this may negatively impact QoL. Similarly, the average scores of measures assessing QoL, sleep quality, and self-stigma reported here were comparable with those from other studies of people with schizophrenia [7,25,32,34,35], and these findings suggest a need for designing health-promoting interventions addressing these domains.
Unlike previous studies that have reported significant associations between PUSM and QoL in general populations, particularly among youth [19,72], we did not observe significant direct associations between these two domains in our sample. Several possibilities exist. First, using social media may have positive impacts, particularly for improving social communication in people with schizophrenia who may have limited in-person, face-to-face social interactions; this may have been particularly relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic when some data were collected [10,14]. Therefore, direct associations between these two variables may not have been observed despite expectations. Second, we used statistical methods based on temporal associations between the variables longitudinally that may provide a more concise estimation than those conducted in cross-sectional studies. Thus, we examined associations between these variables through sleep quality and selfstigma in mediation models. Third, using GEE models may lead to different results than those that may be observed in bivariate correlations. Indeed, we employed this method to provide a more comprehensive approach to understanding how specific variables may influence QoL instead of conducting correlations between paired variables. Finally, demographic characteristics of our sample differ from several previous studies [19,72]. While those focused on the adolescents and young adult populations, our sample included people with an average age of 40 years, and age should be considered as possibly modifying effects of PUSM on QoL.
As we found, there were significant associations between PUSM (as the independent variable) and self-stigma and sleep quality (as mediators). Such relationships have been identified in prior studies of other populations. However, a main point here involves which mechanisms may underlie these associations. A likely explanation for the association between PUSM and self-stigma may be related to situations in which people receive more information or feedback regarding their conditions (specifically here schizophrenia), this process may lead to comparisons between their current situations and the situations of healthy people that may promote self-stigmatization due to recognizing limitations related to the disorders. Indeed, when people communicate through social media excessively, this may increase their sensitivity concerning their condition and consequently generate self-stigma. In a similar manner, people who engage in social media beyond normal usage (i.e., those with PUSM), may experience disruptions in their circadian rhythms, leading to sleep disturbances. For example, individuals may devote time intended for sleep to excessive use of social media. Consistent with this notion, associations between PUSM and low sleep quality have been shown in several studies [18,27,28].
The associations between sleep quality and QoL among people with schizophrenia have been assessed in several studies [25,26]. Among 207 people with schizophrenia, Wang et al. [25] found a mean score of 6.14±2.94 for the PSQI, with 58% experiencing sleep disturbances. The mean score for this variable in our study was higher than in that study, and this may be attributed to differences in the inclusion criteria for the two studies. Wang et al. [25] enrolled only clinically stable people, whereas we included all people with a schizophrenia diagnosis. They also found a significant difference in QoL between men and women, with men having better QoL than women. However, in our sample we did not find such a difference. This may be related to different scales used to measure QoL (Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale vs. WHOQOL-BREF), different analytical approaches (logistic regression vs. GEE), and/or different sample characteristics and sizes (n=207 vs. 193 at baseline that reduced to 103 at the last follow-up). Among 623 Chinese people with schizophrenia recruited from different primary care centers, Hou et al. [26] found serious sleep disturbances among the sample that may have negatively impacted their QoL, consistent with our findings.
Mosanya et al. [32] studied relationships between self-stigma and QoL among 156 outpatients with schizophrenia. They also found significant associations between self-stigma and poor QoL. Another study conducted in China found that people with schizophrenia were commonly at risk of self-stigmatization and this may not only affect subjective QoL, but also negatively impact physical QoL, as we found here [34].
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study conducted to assess how sleep quality and self-stigma may serve as mechanisms relating PUSM to poorer QoL over time in people with schizophrenia. The temporal association models reflect novelty and provide directional insights. However, there are some limitations that should be noted. First, as we recruited our sample from only one medical center in Taiwan, generalizability of the findings is limited. Indeed, the literature suggests that the incidence of schizophrenia is higher in males than in females [73]; however, the present study included a relatively higher proportion of females (54.4% females vs. 45.6% males). Second, our study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the related lockdowns may have intensified particular problems such as sleep disturbances and PUSM or may have mitigated some of the negative effects of PUSM. Additional studies under more “normal” conditions are warranted. Third, we experienced considerable attrition in our sample over time, and this may have affected our findings. However, we used robust statistical techniques to mitigate negative effects of attrition in as much as possible. Fourth, we controlled some variables including sex, marital status, and education level in our analyses. However, other variables that may influence associations between independent and dependent variables, such as severity of mental symptoms, were not collected and should be considered in future studies. Fifth, the present sample size was relatively small for conducting latent models (e.g., structural equation modeling). Therefore, the present study used GEE models to simplify the statistical analysis and to satisfy the principal of parsimony. Nevertheless, future studies may recruit larger samples to investigate latent models. Finally, the measurement of sleep in the present study (i.e., the PSQI) was subjective. With the use of objective measures of participants’ sleep (e.g., physiological measures assessing sleep quality such as sleep onset and sleep efficiency) may provide additional information via less biased measures to examine the phenomenon investigated in the present study.
In conclusion, the study’s findings suggest mediating roles for both sleep quality and self-stigma in the associations between PUSM and QoL in people with schizophrenia. Therefore, developing interventions to target sleep and self-stigma may reduce not only direct negative impacts on QoL in people with schizophrenia, but also indirect effects of PUSM. Further studies into other possible psychological concerns such as self-concept and self-esteem that may potentially also negatively affect QoL are needed. Such investigations may help further improve our understanding of mental health concerns in people with schizophrenia.


Availability of Data and Material

Data and code may be obtained from the corresponding author with reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

MNP discloses that he has consulted for and advised Game Day Data, Addiction Policy Forum, AXA, Idorsia, Baria-Tek, and Opiant Therapeutics; been involved in a patent application involving Novartis and Yale; received research support from the Mohegan Sun Casino, Children and Screens and the Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling; consulted for or advised legal, gambling and non-profit entities on issues related to impulse control, internet use and addictive behaviors; conducted clinical evaluations related to impulse-control and addictive behaviors; performed grant reviews; edited journals/journal sections; given academic lectures in grand rounds, CME events and other clinical/scientific venues; and generated books or chapters for publishers of mental health texts. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Mohsen Saffari, Kun-Chia Chang, Jung-Sheng Chen, Marc N. Potenza, Hsin-Chi Tsai, Chung-Ying Lin. Data curation: Kun-Chia Chang. Formal analysis: Chung-Ying Lin. Funding acquisition: Hsin-Chi Tsai, Chung-Ying Lin. Investigation: Kun-Chia Chang, Chung-Ying Lin. Methodology: Marc N. Potenza, Cheng-Fang Yen, Ching-Wen Chang, Hsin-Chi Tsai, Chung-Ying Lin, Po-Ching Huang. Project administration: Kun-Chia Chang, Chung-Ying Lin. Resources: Kun-Chia Chang, Hsin-Chi Tsai, Chung-Ying Lin. Software: Chung-Ying Lin. Supervision: Chung-Ying Lin. Validation: Mohsen Saffari, Kun-Chia Chang, Jung-Sheng Chen, Marc N. Potenza, Cheng-Fang Yen, Ching-Wen Chang, Hsin-Chi Tsai, Po-Ching Huang. Visualization: Chung-Ying Lin. Writing—original draft: Mohsen Saffari, Kun-Chia Chang, Chung-Ying Lin. Writing—review & editing: Kun-Chia Chang, Jung-Sheng Chen, Marc N. Potenza, Cheng-Fang Yen, Ching-Wen Chang, Hsin-Chi Tsai, Chung-Ying Lin, Po-Ching Huang.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 110-2410-H-006-115; MOST 111-2410-H-006-100; MOST 108-2314-B-695-001), the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (NSTC 112-2410-H-006-089-SS2), and the Higher Education Sprout Project, Ministry of Education to the Headquarters of University Advancement at National Cheng Kung University (NCKU).


We thank all the participants in the study.

Figure 1.
Hypothesized models of mediation of sleep quality and self-stigma in the association between problematic use of social media and quality of life (QoL). Solid lines indicate direct effects; dashed lines indicate mediation (indirect effects). QoL included four domains of physical, psychological, social, and environmental QoL; they were analyzed separately in the hypothesized models.
Figure 2.
Sleep quality as a mediator in the relationship between problematic use of social media and quality of life (QoL) among people with schizophrenia. A: Physical QoL. B: Psychological QoL. C: Social QoL. D: Environmental QoL. LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit.
Figure 3.
Self-stigma as a mediator in the relationship between problematic use of social media and quality of life (QoL) among people with schizophrenia. A: Physical QoL. B: Psychological QoL. C: Social QoL. D: Environmental QoL. LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit.
Table 1.
Participant characteristics
Characteristics Value (N=193) Possible range
Sex, male 88 (45.6) -
Age (yr) 41.34±9.01 -
Marital status
 Single 122 (63.2) -
 Married 28 (14.5) -
 Other 43 (22.3) -
Years of education (yr) 12.14±2.58 -
Physical disease, yes 62 (32.1) -
Physical quality of life 12.77±2.66 4-20
Psychological quality of life 11.86±3.00 4-20
Social quality of life 12.20±2.94 4-20
Environmental quality of life 13.02±2.64 4-20
Sleep quality 9.13±4.48 0-21
Self-stigma 2.20±0.84 1-4
Problematic use of social media 11.82±5.34 6-30

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

Table 2.
Generalized estimating equations in explaining quality of life (QoL), sleep quality, and self-stigma among people with schizophrenia
Variable Coeff. (SE)/p
Outcome: QoL
Physical QoL Psychological QoL Social QoL Environment QoL Sleep quality Self-stigma
Sex (ref: male) -0.19 (0.27)/0.48 -0.28 (0.31)/0.37 0.36 (0.31)/0.24 -0.03 (0.30)/0.93 0.82 (0.57)/0.15 0.05 (0.11)/0.63
Age -0.02 (0.02)/0.38 -0.01 (0.02)/0.56 -0.01 (0.02)/0.59 -0.01 (0.02)/0.59 0.02 (0.03)/0.50 0.01 (0.01)/0.42
Marital status (ref: single)
 Married -0.01 (0.38)/0.97 -0.11 (0.46)/0.81 -0.09 (0.35)/0.80 0.20 (0.39)/0.62 0.35 (0.87)/0.69 0.15 (0.13)/0.25
 Other -0.53 (0.36)/0.15 -0.69 (0.40)/0.09 -0.36 (0.34)/0.30 0.12 (0.33)/0.72 1.24 (0.72)/0.09 -0.04 (0.14)/0.77
Years of education 0.05 (0.06)/0.40 0.03 (0.07)/0.65 0.02 (0.05)/0.65 0.12 (0.06)/0.04 -0.01 (0.11)/0.91 -0.04 (0.02)/0.02
Physical disease (ref: yes) 0.21 (0.31)/0.50 -0.05 (0.33)/0.87 0.01 (0.29)/0.98 0.30 (0.29)/0.31 -0.87 (0.56)/0.12 0.12 (0.10)/0.24
Problematic use of social media 0.02 (0.03)/0.61 -0.01 (0.03)/0.72 -0.001 (0.03)/0.98 0.01 (0.03)/0.81 0.12 (0.04)/0.003 0.03 (0.008)/<0.001
Sleep quality -0.27 (0.04)/<0.001 -0.25 (0.04)/<0.001 -0.12 (0.03)/<0.001 -0.15 (0.04)/<0.001 - -
Self-stigma -0.92 (0.17)/<0.001 -1.32 (0.21)/<0.001 -1.42 (0.19)/<0.001 -1.11 (0.19)/<0.001 - -
Time 0.03 (0.06)/0.64 0.04 (0.06)/0.48 -0.04 (0.06)/0.57 0.04 (0.06)/0.48 -0.25 (0.10)/0.01 -0.01 (0.02)/0.77

Mediation was examined using a Monte Carlo method (; 95% confidence interval of 20,000 repetitions. Coeff., coefficient; SE, standard error


1. World Health Organization. Schizophrenia: Key facts [Internet]. Available at: Accessed July 10, 2023.

2. Charlson FJ, Ferrari AJ, Santomauro DF, Diminic S, Stockings E, Scott JG, et al. Global epidemiology and burden of schizophrenia: findings from the global burden of disease study 2016. Schizophr Bull 2018;44:1195-1203.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Bhugra D. The global prevalence of schizophrenia. PLoS Med 2005;2:e151.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Chan KY, Zhao FF, Meng S, Demaio AR, Reed C, Theodoratou E, et al. Prevalence of schizophrenia in China between 1990 and 2010. J Glob Health 2015;5:010410
pmid pmc
5. Chien IC, Chou YJ, Lin CH, Bih SH, Chou P, Chang HJ. Prevalence and incidence of schizophrenia among national health insurance enrollees in Taiwan, 1996-2001. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2004;58:611-618.
crossref pmid
6. Soares-Weiser K, Maayan N, Bergman H, Davenport C, Kirkham AJ, Grabowski S, et al. First rank symptoms for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;1:CD010653
crossref pmid
7. Dziwota E, Stepulak MZ, Włoszczak-Szubzda A, Olajossy M. Social functioning and the quality of life of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Ann Agric Environ Med 2018;25:50-55.
crossref pmid
8. Rekhi G, Ang MS, Lee J. Clinical determinants of social media use in individuals with schizophrenia. PLoS One 2019;14:e0225370.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Birnbaum ML, Rizvi AF, Confino J, Correll CU, Kane JM. Role of social media and the Internet in pathways to care for adolescents and young adults with psychotic disorders and non-psychotic mood disorders. Early Interv Psychiatry 2017;11:290-295.
10. Fonseka LN, Woo BKP. Social media and schizophrenia: an update on clinical applications. World J Psychiatry 2022;12:897-903.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Cochand S, Hoch A, Khankarli MB, Khan R, et al. Internet use by patients with psychiatric disorders in search for general and medical informations. Psychiatr Q 2008;79:301-309.
crossref pmid pdf
12. Trefflich F, Kalckreuth S, Mergl R, Rummel-Kluge C. Psychiatric patients’ internet use corresponds to the internet use of the general public. Psychiatry Res 2015;226:136-141.
crossref pmid
13. Webelhorst C, Jepsen L, Rummel-Kluge C. Utilization of e-mentalhealth and online self-management interventions of patients with mental disorders-a cross-sectional analysis. PLoS One 2020;15:e0231373.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Torous J, Keshavan M. The role of social media in schizophrenia: evaluating risks, benefits, and potential. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2016;29:190-195.
15. Lopes LS, Valentini JP, Monteiro TH, Costacurta MCF, Soares LON, Telfar-Barnard L, et al. Problematic social media use and its relationship with depression or anxiety: a systematic review. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2022;25:691-702.
crossref pmid
16. Zhang L, Strauss GP. Adaptive and maladaptive consequences of increased social media and internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2022;243:472-474.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Chen BC, Chen MY, Wu YF, Wu YT. The relationship of social media addiction with internet use and perceived health: the moderating effects of regular exercise intervention. Front Public Health 2022;10:854532
crossref pmid pmc
18. Shimoga SV, Erlyana E, Rebello V. Associations of social media use with physical activity and sleep adequacy among adolescents: crosssectional survey. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e14290.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Yu L, Du M. Social networking use, mental health, and quality of life of Hong Kong adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Public Health 2022;10:1040169
crossref pmid pmc
20. Pellegrino A, Stasi A, Bhatiasevi V. Research trends in social media addiction and problematic social media use: a bibliometric analysis. Front Psychiatry 2022;13:1017506
crossref pmid pmc
21. Hacimusalar Y, Karaaslan O, Misir E, Amuk OC, Hacimusalar G. Sleep quality impairments in schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder patients continue during periods of remission: a case-controlled study. Sleep Sci 2022;15:47-54.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Cohrs S. Sleep disturbances in patients with schizophrenia: impact and effect of antipsychotics. CNS Drugs 2008;22:939-962.
crossref pmid
23. Esan O, Ephraim-Oluwanuga OT. Sleep quality and cognitive impairments in remitted patients with schizophrenia in Nigeria. Encephale 2021;47:401-405.
crossref pmid
24. Hou CL, Li Y, Cai MY, Ma XR, Zang Y, Jia FJ, et al. Prevalence of insomnia and clinical and quality of life correlates in Chinese patients with schizophrenia treated in primary care. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2017;53:80-86.
crossref pmid pdf
25. Wang WL, Zhou YQ, Chai NN, Li GH. Sleep disturbance and quality of life in clinically stable inpatients with schizophrenia in rural China. Qual Life Res 2020;29:2759-2768.
crossref pmid pdf
26. Hou CL, Zang Y, Ma XR, Cai MY, Li Y, Jia FJ, et al. The relationship between sleep patterns, quality of life, and social and clinical characteristics in Chinese patients with schizophrenia. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2017;53:342-349.
crossref pmid pdf
27. Alonzo R, Hussain J, Stranges S, Anderson KK. Interplay between social media use, sleep quality, and mental health in youth: a systematic review. Sleep Med Rev 2021;56:101414
crossref pmid
28. Mohammadbeigi A, Absari R, Valizadeh F, Saadati M, Sharifimoghadam S, Ahmadi A, et al. Sleep quality in medical students; the impact of over-use of mobile cell-phone and social networks. J Res Health Sci 2016;16:46-50.
pmid pmc
29. Morgades-Bamba CI, Fuster-Ruizdeapodaca MJ, Molero F. Internalized stigma and its impact on schizophrenia quality of life. Psychol Health Med 2019;24:992-1004.
crossref pmid
30. Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KJ. Risks to privacy with use of social media: understanding the views of social media users with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2019;70:561-568.
crossref pmid pmc
31. Corrigan PW, Rao D. On the self-stigma of mental illness: stages, disclosure, and strategies for change. Can J Psychiatry 2012;57:464-469.
crossref pmid pdf
32. Mosanya TJ, Adelufosi AO, Adebowale OT, Ogunwale A, Adebayo OK. Self-stigma, quality of life and schizophrenia: an outpatient clinic survey in Nigeria. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2014;60:377-386.
crossref pmid pdf
33. Mannarini S, Taccini F, Sato I, Rossi AA. Understanding stigma toward schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2022;318:114970
crossref pmid
34. Vrbova K, Prasko J, Ociskova M, Kamaradova D, Marackova M, Holubova M, et al. Quality of life, self-stigma, and hope in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a cross-sectional study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2017;13:567-576.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
35. Lien YJ, Chang HA, Kao YC, Tzeng NS, Lu CW, Loh CH. Insight, selfstigma and psychosocial outcomes in schizophrenia: a structural equation modelling approach. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2018;27:176-185.
crossref pmid
36. Chang KC, Chang YH, Yen CF, Chen JS, Chen PJ, Lin CY, et al. A longitudinal study of the effects of problematic smartphone use on social functioning among people with schizophrenia: mediating roles for sleep quality and self-stigma. J Behav Addict 2022;11:567-576.
crossref pmid pmc
37. Chang YH, Chang KC, Hou WL, Lin CY, Griffiths MD. Internet gaming as a coping method among schizophrenic patients facing psychological distress. J Behav Addict 2020;9:1022-1031.
crossref pmid pmc
38. Little RJA. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc 1988;83:1198-1202.
39. Cheng WL, Chang CC, Griffiths MD, Yen CF, Liu JH, Su JA, et al. Quality of life and care burden among family caregivers of people with severe mental illness: mediating effects of self-esteem and psychological distress. BMC Psychiatry 2022;22:672
crossref pmid pmc pdf
40. The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998;28:551-558.
crossref pmid
41. Yao G, Chung CW, Yu CF, Wang JD. Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. J Formos Med Assoc 2002;101:342-351.
42. Chang KC, Wang JD, Tang HP, Cheng CM, Lin CY. Psychometric evaluation, using Rasch analysis, of the WHOQOL-BREF in heroin-dependent people undergoing methadone maintenance treatment: further item validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014;12:148
crossref pmid pmc pdf
43. Lin CY, Lee TY, Sun ZJ, Yang YC, Wu JS, Ou HT. Development of diabetes-specific quality of life module to be in conjunction with the World Health Organization quality of life scale brief version (WHOQOLBREF). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017;15:167
crossref pmid pmc pdf
44. Lin CY, Li YP, Lin SI, Chen CH. Measurement equivalence across gender and education in the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling elderly Taiwanese. Int Psychogeriatr 2016;28:1375-1382.
crossref pmid
45. Lin CY, Hwang JS, Wang WC, Lai WW, Su WC, Wu TY, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF, Taiwan version, across five kinds of Taiwanese cancer survivors: Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. J Formos Med Assoc 2019;118:215-222.
crossref pmid
46. Su CT, Ng HS, Yang AL, Lin CY. Psychometric evaluation of the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) for patients with schizophrenia. Psychol Assess 2014;26:980-989.
crossref pmid
47. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28:193-213.
crossref pmid
48. Lin CY, Imani V, Griffiths MD, Broström A, Nygårdh A, Demetrovics Z, et al. Temporal associations between morningness/eveningness, problematic social media use, psychological distress and daytime sleepiness: mediated roles of sleep quality and insomnia among young adults. J Sleep Res 2021;30:e13076.
crossref pmid pdf
49. Saffari M, Chen HP, Chang CW, Fan CW, Huang SW, Chen JS, et al. Effects of sleep quality on the association between problematic internet use and quality of life in people with substance use disorder. BJPsych Open 2022;8:e155.
crossref pmid pmc
50. Tsai PS, Wang SY, Wang MY, Su CT, Yang TT, Huang CJ, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (CPSQI) in primary insomnia and control subjects. Qual Life Res 2005;14:1943-1952.
crossref pmid pdf
51. Mak WW, Cheung RY. Self-stigma among concealable minorities in Hong Kong: conceptualization and unified measurement. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2010;80:267-281.
crossref pmid
52. Chang KC, Chen HP, Huang SW, Chen JS, Potenza MN, Pakpour AH, et al. Comparisons of psychological distress and self-stigma among three types of substance use disorders receiving treatment-as-usual approaches: real-world data from a 9-month longitudinal study. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2022;13:20406223221140393
crossref pmid pmc pdf
53. Chen IH, Chang KC, Chang CW, Huang SW, Potenza MN, Pakpour AH, et al. Temporal associations between problematic use of the internet and self-stigma among people with substance use disorders: a crosslagged model across one year. J Psychiatr Res 2022;156:339-348.
crossref pmid
54. Fan CW, Chang KC, Lee KY, Yang WC, Pakpour AH, Potenza MN, et al. Rasch modeling and differential item functioning of the Self-Stigma Scale - Short version among people with three different psychiatric disorders. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:8843
crossref pmid pmc
55. Saffari M, Chang KC, Chen JS, Chang CW, Chen IH, Huang SW, et al. Temporal associations between depressive features and self-stigma in people with substance use disorders related to heroin, amphetamine, and alcohol use: a cross-lagged analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2022;22:815
crossref pmid pmc pdf
56. Chang CC, Lin CY, Gronholm PC, Wu TH. Cross-validation of two commonly used self-stigma measures, Taiwan versions of the Internalized Stigma Mental Illness scale and Self-Stigma Scale-Short, for people with mental illness. Assessment 2018;25:777-792.
crossref pmid pdf
57. Wu TH, Chang CC, Chen CY, Wang JD, Lin CY. Further psychometric evaluation of the self-stigma scale-short: measurement invariance across mental illness and gender. PLoS One 2015;10:e0117592.
crossref pmid pmc
58. Schou Andreassen C, Billieux J, Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, Demetrovics Z, Mazzoni E, et al. The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a largescale cross-sectional study. Psychol Addict Behav 2016;30:252-262.
crossref pmid
59. Griffiths M. A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. J Subst Use 2005;10:191-197.
60. Lin CY, Broström A, Nilsen P, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. Psychometric validation of the Persian Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale using classic test theory and Rasch models. J Behav Addict 2017;6:620-629.
crossref pmid pmc
61. Monacis L, de Palo V, Griffiths MD, Sinatra M. Social networking addiction, attachment style, and validation of the Italian version of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. J Behav Addict 2017;6:178-186.
crossref pmid pmc
62. Shin NY. Psychometric properties of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale in Korean young adults. Psychiatry Investig 2022;19:356-361.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
63. Tung SEH, Gan WY, Chen JS, Ruckwongpatr K, Pramukti I, Nadhiroh SR, et al. Internet-related instruments (Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale, Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form, and Nomophobia Questionnaire) and their associations with distress among Malaysian university students. Healthcare (Basel) 2022;10:1448
crossref pmid pmc
64. Yam CW, Pakpour AH, Griffiths MD, Yau WY, Lo CM, Ng JMT, et al. Psychometric testing of three Chinese online-related addictive behavior instruments among Hong Kong university students. Psychiatr Q 2019;90:117-128.
crossref pmid pdf
65. Yue H, Zhang X, Cheng X, Liu B, Bao H. Measurement invariance of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale across genders. Front Psychol 2022;13:879259
crossref pmid pmc
66. Chen IH, Ahorsu DK, Pakpour AH, Griffiths MD, Lin CY, Chen CY. Psychometric properties of three simplified Chinese online-related addictive behavior instruments among Mainland Chinese primary school students. Front Psychiatry 2020;11:875
crossref pmid pmc
67. Chen IH, Strong C, Lin YC, Tsai MC, Leung H, Lin CY, et al. Time invariance of three ultra-brief internet-related instruments: Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS), Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), and the nine-item Internet Gaming Disorder Scale - Short Form (IGDS-SF9) (Study Part B). Addict Behav 2020;101:105960
crossref pmid
68. Leung H, Pakpour AH, Strong C, Lin YC, Tsai MC, Griffiths MD, et al. Measurement invariance across young adults from Hong Kong and Taiwan among three internet-related addiction scales: Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS), and Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form (IGDS-SF9) (Study Part A). Addict Behav 2020;101:105969
crossref pmid
69. Preacher KJ, Selig JP. Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Commun Methods Meas 2012;6:77-98.
70. Bauer DJ, Preacher KJ, Gil KM. Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods 2006;11:142-163.
crossref pmid
71. Xiang YT, Wang CY, Chiu HF, Weng YZ, Bo QJ, Chan SS, et al. Sociodemographic and clinical profiles of paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenia: a prospective, multicenter study in China. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2011;47:126-130.
crossref pmid
72. You Y, Yang-Huang J, Raat H, Van Grieken A. Social media use and health-related quality of life among adolescents: cross-sectional study. JMIR Ment Health 2022;9:e39710.
crossref pmid pmc
73. Li X, Zhou W, Yi Z. A glimpse of gender differences in schizophrenia. Gen Psychiatr 2022;35:e100823.
crossref pmid pmc


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
#522, 27, Seochojungang-ro 24-gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06601, Korea
Tel: +82-2-717-0892    E-mail:                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Neuropsychiatric Association.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next